Download PDF
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2023; 84(04): 390-393
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735859
Case Report

Surviving a Self-inflicted Transorbital Pen Intrusion to the Cerebellum: Case Report

David Breuskin
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Homburg, Saarland, Germany
,
Ralf Ketter
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Homburg, Saarland, Germany
,
Joachim Oertel
1   Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Homburg, Saarland, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Although intracranial traumas by penetrating foreign objects are not absolute rarities, the nature of trauma, the kind of object, and its trajectory make them a one of a kind case every time they occur. Whereas high-velocity traumas mostly result in fatalities, it is the low-velocity traumas that demand an individualized surgical strategy.

Methods We present a case report of a 33-year-old patient who was admitted to our department with a self-inflicted transorbital pen injury to the brain. The authors recall the incident and the technique of the pen removal.

Results Large surgical exposure of the pen trajectory was considered too traumatic. Therefore, we opted to remove the pen and have an immediate postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan. Due to its fragility, the pen case could only be removed with a screwdriver, inserted into the case. Post-op CT scan showed a small bleeding in the right peduncular region, which was treated conservatively. The patient was transferred back to intensive care unit and woken up the next day. She lost visual function on her right eye, but suffered from no further neurologic deficit.

Conclusion Surgical management of removal of intracranial foreign bodies is no routine procedure. Although some would favor a large surgical exposure, we could not think of an approach to do so without maximum surgical efforts. We opted for a minimal surgical procedure with immediate CT scan and achieved an optimal result. We find this case to be worth considering when deciding on a strategy in the future.

Keywords

pen - brain trauma - transorbital - cerebellum


Publication History

Received: 23 November 2020

Accepted: 09 March 2021

Article published online:
15 November 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Moussa WM, Abbas M. Management and outcome of low velocity penetrating head injury caused by impacted foreign bodies. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2016; 158 (05) 895-904 , discussion 904
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ghadersohi S, Ference EH, Detwiller K, Kern RC. Presentation, workup, and management of penetrating transorbital and transnasal injuries: a case report and systematic review. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2017; 31 (02) 29-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Harrington BM, Gretschel A, Lombard C, Lonser RR, Vlok AJ. Complications, outcomes, and management strategies of non-missile penetrating head injuries. J Neurosurg 2020; 134 (05) 1658-1666
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Santander XA, Revuelta JM, Cotúa C, Arellano Rodriguez B, de Leyva Moreno P, Saab Mazzei A. Occult transorbital intracranial injury by a windscreen wiper handle: a case report and review of the literature. World Neurosurg 2019; 126: 530-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sathish K, Chaudhari VA, Murthy AS. Fatal transorbital intracranial penetrating injury due to a bicycle brake handle. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2018; 39 (03) 253-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Lee YC, Kwan HH, Wong T, Pan NY, Lai HY, Ma KF. Self-inflicted transorbital brain injury by chopsticks in a patient with acute psychosis. Hong Kong Med J 2017; 23 (03) 313-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sun G, Yagmurlu K, Belykh E, Lei T, Preul MC. Management strategy of a transorbital penetrating pontine injury by a wooden chopstick. World Neurosurg 2016; 95: 622.e7-622.e15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Behera SK, Panigrahi S, Mishra SS, Senapati SB. Transorbital penetrating brain injury by a wooden stick: a neuro-ophthalmologic emergency. Asian J Neurosurg 2016; 11 (03) 321-322
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mzimbiri JM, Li J, Xia Y, Yuan J, Liu J, Liu Q. Surviving penetrating brainstem injury by bamboo sticks: rare case reports and a brief review of literature. Neurosurgery 2016; 78 (05) E753-E760
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Davis GA, Holmes AD, Klug GL. Delayed presentation of transorbital intracranial pen. J Clin Neurosci 2000; 7 (06) 545-548
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Nishio Y, Hayashi N, Hamada H, Hirashima Y, Endo S. A case of delayed brain abscess due to a retained intracranial wooden foreign body: a case report and review of the last 20 years. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2004; 146 (08) 847-850
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Miller CF, Brodkey JS, Colombi BJ. The danger of intracranial wood. Surg Neurol 1977; 7 (02) 95-103
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Borkar SA, Garg K, Garg M, Sharma BS. Transorbital penetrating cerebral injury caused by a wooden stick: surgical nuances for removal of a foreign body lodged in cavernous sinus. Childs Nerv Syst 2014; 30 (08) 1441-1444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar