Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2023; 40(07): 718-730
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1736382
Review Article

Maternal Sepsis: A Review of National and International Guidelines

Angela J. Stephens
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Suneet P. Chauhan
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
John R. Barton
2   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Baptist Health Lexington, Lexington, Kentucky
,
Baha M. Sibai
1   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome caused by the body's response to infection. The Global Maternal Sepsis Study (GLOSS) suggests sepsis plays a larger role in maternal morbidity and mortality than previously thought. We therefore sought to compare national and international guidelines for maternal sepsis to determine their consistency with each other and the Third International Consensus for Sepsis and Septic Shock (SEPSIS-3). Using Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, Google Scholar, and organization Web sites, we identified seven guidelines on maternal sepsis in the English language—The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Royal College of Physicians of Ireland Institute of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and World Health Organization. Guidelines were reviewed to ascertain the commonality and variation, if any, in definitions of maternal sepsis, tools and criteria utilized for diagnosis, obstetric warning systems used, as well as evaluation and management of maternal sepsis. These variables were also compared with SEPSIS-3. All guidelines provided definitions consistent with a version of the SEPSIS, although the specific version utilized were varied. Clinical variables and tools employed for diagnosis of maternal sepsis were also varied. Evaluation and management of maternal sepsis and septic shock were similar. In conclusion, national and international maternal sepsis guidelines were incongruent with each other and SEPSIS-3 in diagnostic criteria and tools but similar in evaluation and management recommendations.

Key Points

  • Definitions for maternal sepsis and septic shock are varied.

  • Maternal sepsis guidelines differ in proposed criteria and tools.

  • Maternal sepsis guidelines have similar management recommendations.

Keywords

sepsis - maternal sepsis - sepsis in pregnancy - obstetric warning systems - SEPSIS-3 - maternal mortality


Publication History

Received: 11 November 2020

Accepted: 31 August 2021

Article published online:
11 October 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Barton JR, Sibai BM. Severe sepsis and septic shock in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120 (03) 689-706
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW. et al. The Third International Consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (SEPSIS-3). JAMA 2016; 315 (08) 801-810
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB. et al; The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Chest 1992; 101 (06) 1644-1655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC. et al; SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med 2003; 31 (04) 1250-1256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Plante LA, Pacheco LD, Louis JM. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM). Electronic address: pubs@smfm.org. SMFM consult series #47: sepsis during pregnancy and the puerperium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220 (04) B2-B10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Plante LA. Management of sepsis and septic shock for the obstetrician-gynecologist. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2016; 43 (04) 659-678
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Ali A, Lamont RF. Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of sepsis in pregnancy. F1000 Res 2019; 8: 8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Burlinson CEG, Sirounis D, Walley KR, Chau A. Sepsis in pregnancy and the puerperium. Int J Obstet Anesth 2018; 36: 96-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 WHO Global Maternal Sepsis Study (GLOSS) Research Group. Frequency and management of maternal infection in health facilities in 52 countries (GLOSS): a 1-week inception cohort study. Lancet Glob Health 2020; 8 (05) e661-e671
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kendle AM, Salemi JL, Tanner JP, Louis JM. Delivery-associated sepsis: trends in prevalence and mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220 (04) 391.e1-391.e16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Acosta CD, Knight M. Sepsis and maternal mortality. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2013; 25 (02) 109-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Acosta CD, Kurinczuk JJ, Lucas DN, Tuffnell DJ, Sellers S, Knight M. United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System. Severe maternal sepsis in the UK, 2011-2012: a national case-control study. PLoS Med 2014; 11 (07) e1001672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bridwell RE, Carius BM, Long B, Oliver JJ, Schmitz G. Sepsis in pregnancy: recognition and resuscitation. West J Emerg Med 2019; 20 (05) 822-832
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Pacheco LD, Saade GR, Hankins GD. Severe sepsis during pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014; 57 (04) 827-834
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Snyder CC, Barton JR, Habli M, Sibai BM. Severe sepsis and septic shock in pregnancy: indications for delivery and maternal and perinatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 26 (05) 503-506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cordioli RL, Cordioli E, Negrini R, Silva E. Sepsis and pregnancy: do we know how to treat this situation?. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 2013; 25 (04) 334-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lappen JR, Keene M, Lore M, Grobman WA, Gossett DR. Existing models fail to predict sepsis in an obstetric population with intrauterine infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (06) 573.e1-573.e5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bauer ME, Lorenz RP, Bauer ST, Rao K, Anderson FWJ. Maternal deaths due to sepsis in the state of Michigan, 1999–2006. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 126 (04) 747-752
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Greer O, Shah NM, Sriskandan S, Johnson MR. Sepsis: precision-based medicine for pregnancy and the puerperium. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20 (21) 5388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Escobar MF, Echavarria MP, Zambrano MA, Ramos I, Kusanovic JP. Maternal sepsis. AJOG MFM 2020; 2 (03) 100149
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Critical care pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133 (05) 303-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecologists. Bacterial sepsis in pregnancy: green-top guideline No. 64a. Accessed March 1, 2020 at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_64a.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Health Service Executive. Guidelines for the critically ill woman in obstetrics. Accessed March 1, 2020 at: https://rcpi-live-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/25.-Guidelines-for-the-Critically-Ill-Woman-in-Obstetrics.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Department of Health and National Patient Safety Office. Irish Maternity Early Warning System (IMEWS) V2: national clinical guideline number 4. Accessed March 1, 2020 at: https://assets.gov.ie/35807/6f4f5017fd7a466bbb1b77041b19a03c.%204%20Full%20Report
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Institute of Obstetrician and Gynecology. Clinical practice guideline: bacterial infections specific to pregnancy. Accessed March 1, 2020 at: https://rcpi-live-cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/29.-Bacterial-Infection-Specific-to-Pregnancy.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 National Clinical Effectiveness Committee. Sepsis management: national clinical guideline number 6. Accessed March 1, 2020 at: https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/publications/clinical-strategy-and-programmes/guideline-no-6-sepsis-management.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Sepsis predisposition and recognition. Accessed March 1, 2020 at: https://www.hse.ie/eng/services/publications/clinical-strategy-and-programmes/maternal-sepsis.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 World Health Organization. Statement on maternal sepsis. Accessed March 1, 2020 at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254608/WHO-RHR-17.02-eng.pdf?sequence=1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bonet M, Souza JP, Abalos E. et al. The global maternal sepsis study and awareness campaign (GLOSS): study protocol. Reprod Health 2018; 15 (01) 16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 World Health Organization. WHO Recommendations for prevention and treatment of maternal peripartum infections. Accessed March 1, 2020 at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/186171/9789241549363_eng.pdf?sequence=1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 World Health Organization. Maternal sepsis infographic. Accessed March 1, 2020 at: https://srhr.org/sepsis/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/WHO_Infographic-Maternal-sepsis-overview-SP-A4-WEB.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 World Health Organization. Suspect-treat-prevent: stop maternal sepsis. Accessed March 1, 2020 at: https://srhr.org/sepsis/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/WHO_Infographic-Sepsis-Treatment-EN-A4-WEB.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 World Health Organization. Global maternal sepsis study and awareness campaign global results. Accessed May 5, 2020 at: https://srhr.org/sepsis/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/WHO_GLOSS-Results-GLOBAL.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 World Health Organization. Education material for teachers of midwifery. Managing puerperal sepsis. Accessed March 1, 2020 at: https://www.glowm.com/pdf/Managing%20Purperal%20Sepsis.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Dellinger RP, Schorr CA, Levy MM. A users' guide to the 2016 surviving sepsis guidelines. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43 (03) 299-303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Bowyer L, Robinson HL, Barrett H. et al. SOMANZ guidelines for the investigation and management sepsis in pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 57 (05) 540-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM. et al; International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Emergency Physicians, Canadian Critical Care Society, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, European Respiratory Society, International Sepsis Forum, Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Hospital Medicine, Surgical Infection Society, World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med 2008; 36 (01) 296-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Daniels R, Nutbeam T, McNamara G, Galvin C. The sepsis six and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: a prospective observational cohort study. Emerg Med J 2011; 28 (06) 507-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Albright CM, Ali TN, Lopes V, Rouse DJ, Anderson BL. The Sepsis in Obstetrics Score: a model to identify risk of morbidity from sepsis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211 (01) 39.e1-39.e8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Albright CM, Has P, Rouse DJ, Hughes BL. Internal validation of the Sepsis in Obstetrics Score to identify risk of morbidity from sepsis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (04) 747-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Mhyre JM, D'Oria R, Hameed AB. et al. The maternal early warning criteria: a proposal from the national partnership for maternal safety. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (04) 782-786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Lewis G. Saving mothers' lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer 2003–2005: the seventh report of confidential enquiries into maternal and child health in the United Kingdom. Accesed March 6, 2020 at: https://www.publichealth.hscni.net/sites/default/files/Saving%20Mothers'%20Lives%202003-05%20.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Singh S, McGlennan A, England A, Simons R. A validation study of the CEMACH recommended modified early obstetric warning system (MEOWS). Anaesthesia 2012; 67 (01) 12-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Maguire PJ, O'Higgins AC, Power KA, Daly N, McKeating A, Turner MJ. Maternal bacteremia and the Irish maternity early warning system. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; 129 (02) 142-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Hensley MK, Bauer ME, Admon LK, Prescott HC. Incidence of maternal sepsis and sepsis-related maternal deaths in the United States. JAMA 2019; 322 (09) 890-892
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Adorno M. Sepsis in the obstetric client. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am 2018; 30 (03) 415-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Bamfo JE. Managing the risks of sepsis in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2013; 27 (04) 583-595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Buddeberg BS, Aveling W. Puerperal sepsis in the 21st century: progress, new challenges and the situation worldwide. Postgrad Med J 2015; 91 (1080): 572-578
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Burlinson CEG, Sirounis D, Walley KR, Chau A. Sepsis in pregnancy and the puerperium. Int J Obstet Anesth 2018; 36: 96-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Vaught AJ. Maternal sepsis. Semin Perinatol 2018; 42 (01) 9-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 O'Regan C, O'Malley EG, Power KA, Reynolds CME, Sheehan SR, Turner MJ. Development of a novel bedside index for the early identification of severe maternal infection. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 235: 26-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Austin DM, Sadler L, McLintock C. et al. Early detection of severe maternal morbidity: a retrospective assessment of the role of an Early Warning Score System. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2014; 54 (02) 152-155
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Cantwell R, Clutton-Brock T, Cooper G. et al. Saving Mothers' Lives: Reviewing maternal deaths to make motherhood safer: 2006-2008. The Eighth Report of the Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom. BJOG 2011; 118 (Suppl. 01) 1-203
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Lepine S, Lawton B, Geller S, Abels P, MacDonald EJ. Severe maternal morbidity due to sepsis: the burden and preventability of disease in New Zealand. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 58 (06) 648-653
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Parfitt SE, Hering SL. Recognition and management of sepsis in the obstetric patient. AACN Adv Crit Care 2018; 29 (03) 303-315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Bonet M, Nogueira Pileggi V, Rijken MJ. et al. Towards a consensus definition of maternal sepsis: results of a systematic review and expert consultation. Reprod Health 2017; 14 (01) 67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Bauer ME, Bauer ST, Rajala B. et al. Maternal physiologic parameters in relationship to systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2014; 124 (03) 535-541
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Lockwood C, Moore T, Copel J, Silver R, Resnik R, Greene M. Creasy and Resnik's Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Principalsand Practice . Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, Inc.; 2019: 1281-1282
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Novosad SA, Sapiano MRP, Grigg C. et al. Vital signs: epidemiology of sepsis: prevalence of health care factors and opportunities for prevention. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016; 65 (33) 864-869
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Maguire PJ, Power KA, Downey AF, O'Higgins AC, Sheehan SR, Turner MJ. Evaluation of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria for the diagnosis of sepsis due to maternal bacteremia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016; 133 (01) 116-119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Escobar MF, Nasner D, Hurtado CF, Fernández PA, Echavarria MP. Characterization of obstetric patients with sepsis identified by two diagnostic scales at a fourth-level clinic in Colombia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018; 143 (01) 71-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Kallur SD, Patil Bada V, Reddy P, Pandya S, Nirmalan PK. Organ dysfunction and organ failure as predictors of outcomes of severe maternal morbidity in an obstetric intensive care unit. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8 (04) OC06-OC08
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Pérez A, Acevedo O, Tamayo FdelC, Oviedo R. Characterization of obstetric patients with multiple organ failure in the intensive care unit of a Havana teaching hospital, 1998 to 2006. MEDICC Rev 2010; 12 (02) 27-32
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Jain S, Guleria K, Suneja A, Vaid NB, Ahuja S. Use of the sequential organ failure assessment score for evaluating outcome among obstetric patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2016; 132 (03) 332-336
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Oliveira Neto AF, Parpinelli MA, Costa ML, Souza RT, Ribeiro do Valle C, Cecatti JG. Exploring epidemiological aspects, distribution of WHO maternal near miss criteria, and organ dysfunction defined by SOFA in cases of severe maternal outcome admitted to obstetric ICU: a cross-sectional study. BioMed Res Int 2018; 2018: 5714890
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Oliveira-Neto A, Parpinelli MA, Cecatti JG, Souza JP, Sousa MH. Sequential organ failure assessment score for evaluating organ failure and outcome of severe maternal morbidity in obstetric intensive care. ScientificWorldJournal 2012; 2012: 172145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Blanco Esquivel LA, Urbina JM, Zerón HM. Approach to an obstetric prognosis scale: The modified SOFA scale. Ghana Med J 2016; 50 (03) 129-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Howell MD, Davis AM. Management of sepsis and septic shock. JAMA 2017; 317 (08) 847-848
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S. et al; Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345 (19) 1368-1377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Arabi YM, Dabbagh OC, Tamim HM. et al. Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy: a randomized controlled trial in medical and surgical critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2008; 36 (12) 3190-3197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Bloos F. et al; German Competence Network Sepsis (SepNet). Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 2008; 358 (02) 125-139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY. et al; NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (13) 1283-1297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Kalfon P, Giraudeau B, Ichai C. et al; CGAO-REA Study Group. Tight computerized versus conventional glucose control in the ICU: a randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 2014; 40 (02) 171-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Preiser JC, Devos P, Ruiz-Santana S. et al. A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35 (10) 1738-1748
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT. et al; ProCESS Investigators. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 370 (18) 1683-1693
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Peake SL, Delaney A, Bailey M. et al; ARISE Investigators, ANZICS Clinical Trials Group. Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock. N Engl J Med 2014; 371 (16) 1496-1506
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS. et al. Protocolised management in sepsis (ProMISe): a multicentre randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of early, goal-directed, protocolised resuscitation for emerging septic shock. Health Technol Assess 2015; 19 (97) i–xxv, 1-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Umar A, Ameh CA, Muriithi F, Mathai M. Early warning systems in obstetrics: A systematic literature review. PLoS One 2019; 14 (05) e0217864
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Kidd JMJ, Gimovsky M. Early prediction of sepsis: cohort study of maternal pyelonephritis. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135(10s)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative. Improving diagnosis and treatment of maternal sepsis. Accessed September 20, 2021 at: https://paclac.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/CMQCC_SepsisToolkit.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Bateman BT, Mhyre JM, Hernandez-Diaz S. et al. Development of a comorbidity index for use in obstetric patients. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (05) 957-965
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Turner MJ. Maternal sepsis is an evolving challenge. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019; 146 (01) 39-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar