Download PDF
J Wrist Surg 2022; 11(04): 335-343
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740135
Scientific Article

Midterm Functional Outcome of the Linked Semiconstrained Distal Radioulnar Joint Prosthesis

Jaak Warlop 
1   Faculty of Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
,
Maarten Van Nuffel
2   Unit of Hand, Wrist and Elbow Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
,
Luc De Smet
2   Unit of Hand, Wrist and Elbow Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
,
Ilse Degreef
2   Unit of Hand, Wrist and Elbow Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background A painful unstable distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) can seriously compromise hand and wrist function. The semiconstrained prosthesis was developed to restore DRUJ function. To date, most outcome reports are coauthored by the designer.

Questions Does independent reporting confirm the promising results of the semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis? Are complication and failure rates acceptable?

Patients and Methods We evaluated patients with the semiconstrained DRUJ implant and a minimum follow-up of 2 years. We monitored patient satisfaction and function with functionality questionnaires and measured wrist range of motion, grip, and key pinch strength. Statistical analysis was done using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, linear and logistic regression.

Results We included 41 patients with 42 implants. Mean follow-up was 46 months (range: 24–102 months). Eighty percent of wrist had undergone previous surgery. We found a mean pronation of 83 degrees (0–90 degrees), supination of 70 degrees (0–90 degrees), flexion of 42 degrees (0–90 degrees), extension of 49 degrees (0–90 degrees), ulnar deviation of 24 degrees (0–60 degrees), and radial deviation of 14 degrees (0–40 degrees). Grip and key pinch strength were 20.1 (1–50 kg) and 6 kg (1–12 kg), respectively. Average patient-rated wrist and hand evaluation score was 42.7 (0–95), disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score was 38 (0–88), and visual analog scale score was 3.6 (0–8). We found a 43% complication rate (mostly minor: ulnar or radial tendinopathy, temporary hypoesthesia) with 24% reoperation and 92% prosthesis survival rate.

Conclusion The linked semiconstrained DRUJ prosthesis has its value in the surgical treatment of DRUJ failure. Currently, most implants are used in secondary surgery and multioperated wrists. More research is required to assess the value of the DRUJ prosthesis as a primary procedure.

Level of evidence This is a level IV, therapeutic study.

Keywords

distal radioulnar joint - joint replacement - arthroplasty - semiconstrained - outcome - complications

Notes

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before the study.


J.W. and I.D. have provided guarantee for this manuscript.


Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the university hospitals institutional review board (S58242).


Authors' Contributions

I.D. was involved in protocol development, gaining ethical approval, patient recruitment, data analysis, and critical review of the first draft. J.W. wrote the first draft of the manuscript and was involved in patient recruitment, data analysis, literature research, writing the first draft and implementing the critical reviews of other authors in writing the final draft. M.V.N. and L.D.S. were involved in patient recruitment and critical review. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 20 March 2021

Accepted: 12 October 2021

Article published online:
13 December 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Markolf KL, Lamey D, Yang S, Meals R, Hotchkiss R. Radioulnar load-sharing in the forearm. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80 (06) 879-888
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Palmer AK, Werner FW. The triangular fibrocartilage complex of the wrist–anatomy and function. J Hand Surg Am 1981; 6 (02) 153-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Scheker LR. Implant arthroplasty for the distal radioulnar joint. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (09) 1639-1644
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Chan JJ, Teunis T, Ring D. Prevalence of triangular fibrocartilage complex abnormalities regardless of symptoms rise with age: systematic review and pooled analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (12) 3987-3994
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Katayama T, Ono H, Suzuki D, Akahane M, Omokawa S, Tanaka Y. Distribution of primary osteoarthritis in the ulnar aspect of the wrist and the factors that are correlated with ulnar wrist osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study. Skeletal Radiol 2013; 42 (09) 1253-1258
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ozer K, Scheker LR. Distal radioulnar joint problems and treatment options. Orthopedics 2006; 29 (01) 38-49 , quiz 50–51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bowers WH. Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty: the hemiresection-interposition technique. J Hand Surg Am 1985; 10 (02) 169-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Darrach W. Partial excision of lower shaft of ulna for deformity following Colles's fracture. 1913. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1992; (275) 3-4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sauve L, Kapandji M. Nouvelle technique de traitement chirurgical des luxations recidivantes isolees de I'extremite inferieure du cubitus. J Chir (Paris) 1936; 47: 589-594
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Zimmerman RM, Jupiter JB. Instability of the distal radioulnar joint. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2014; 39 (07) 727-738
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bell MJ, Hill RJ, McMurtry RY. Ulnar impingement syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1985; 67 (01) 126-129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lees VC, Scheker LR. The radiological demonstration of dynamic ulnar impingement. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 1997; 22: 448-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Sauerbier M, Hahn ME, Fujita M, Neale PG, Berglund LJ, Berger RA. Analysis of dynamic distal radioulnar convergence after ulnar head resection and endoprosthesis implantation. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27 (03) 425-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Swanson AB. Implant arthroplasty for disabilities of the distal radioulnar joint. Use of a silicone rubber capping implant following resection of the ulnar head. Orthop Clin North Am 1973; 4 (02) 373-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 van Schoonhoven J, Fernandez DL, Bowers WH, Herbert TJ. Salvage of failed resection arthroplasties of the distal radioulnar joint using a new ulnar head prosthesis. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25 (03) 438-446
    Google Scholar
  • 16 van Schoonhoven J, Mühldorfer-Fodor M, Fernandez DL, Herbert TJ. Salvage of failed resection arthroplasties of the distal radioulnar joint using an ulnar head prosthesis: long-term results. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37 (07) 1372-1380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Willis AA, Berger RA, Cooney III WP. Arthroplasty of the distal radioulnar joint using a new ulnar head endoprosthesis: preliminary report. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (02) 177-189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Axelsson P, Sollerman C. Constrained implant arthroplasty as a secondary procedure at the distal radioulnar joint: early outcomes. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38 (06) 1111-1118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Rahimtoola ZO, Hubach P. Total modular wrist prosthesis: a new design. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2004; 38 (03) 160-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Scheker LR, Babb BA, Killion PE. Distal ulnar prosthetic replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 2001; 32 (02) 365-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Schuurman AH, Teunis T. A new total distal radioulnar joint prosthesis: functional outcome. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35 (10) 1614-1619
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Calcagni M, Giesen T. Distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty with implants: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2017; 1 (05) 191-196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Moulton LS, Giddins GEB. Distal radio-ulnar implant arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017; 42 (08) 827-838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Fuchs N, Meier LA, Giesen T, Calcagni M, Reissner L. Long-term results after semiconstrained distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty: a focus on complications. Hand Surg Rehabil 2020; 39 (03) 186-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rampazzo A, Gharb BB, Brock G, Scheker LR. Functional outcomes of the Aptis-Scheker distal radioulnar joint replacement in patients under 40 years old. J Hand Surg Am 2015; 40 (07) 1397-1403.e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Savvidou C, Murphy E, Mailhot E, Jacob S, Scheker LR. Semiconstrained distal radioulnar joint prosthesis. J Wrist Surg 2013; 2 (01) 41-48
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Galvis EJ, Pessa J, Scheker LR. Total joint arthroplasty of the distal radioulnar joint for rheumatoid arthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2014; 39 (09) 1699-1704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lans J, Chen S-H, Jupiter JB, Scheker LR. Distal radioulnar joint replacement in the scarred wrist. J Wrist Surg 2019; 8 (01) 55-60
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Martínez Villén G, García Martínez B, Aso Vizán A. Total distal radioulnar joint prosthesis as salvage surgery in multioperated patients. Chir Main 2014; 33 (06) 390-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bellevue KD, Thayer MK, Pouliot M, Huang JI, Hanel DP. Complications of semiconstrained distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Am 2018; 43 (06) 566.e1-566.e9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 DeGeorge Jr BR, Berger RA, Shin AY. Constrained implant arthroplasty for distal radioulnar joint arthrosis: evaluation and management of soft tissue complications. J Hand Surg Am 2019; 44 (07) 614.e1-614.e9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Reissner L, Böttger K, Klein HJ, Calcagni M, Giesen T. Midterm results of semiconstrained distal radioulnar joint arthroplasty and analysis of complications. J Wrist Surg 2016; 5 (04) 290-296
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Scheker LR, Martineau DW. Distal radioulnar joint constrained arthroplasty. Hand Clin 2013; 29 (01) 113-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar