J Pediatr Intensive Care
DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1740360
Original Article

The Impact of a Pediatric Continuity Care Intensivist Program on Patient and Parent Outcomes: An Unblinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Jennifer K. Walter
1   Department of Pediatrics at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Vanessa Madrigal
2   Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children's National Hospital and George Washington University, Washington, D.C., United States
,
Parth Shah
3   Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Sherri Kubis
4   Cardiac Nursing at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Adam S. Himebauch
5   Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
,
Chris Feudtner
1   Department of Pediatrics at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
› Author Affiliations
Funding Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K23HL141700. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Abstract

Objectives We studied the impact of a standardized continuity care intensivists (CCIs) program on patient and family outcomes for long-stay patients in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), also assessing the intervention's acceptability and feasibility.

Methods A patient-level, unblinded randomized-controlled trial in a PICU at a large children's hospital. Participants included: (1) patients with ≥ 7 days PICU admission and likely to stay another 7 days; (2) their parents; (3) PICU attendings participating as continuity attendings; and (4) PICU attendings providing usual care (UC). We examined a bundled intervention: (1) standardized continuity attending role, (2) communication training course for CCI, and (3) standardized timing of contact between CCI and patient/family.

Results Primary outcome was patient PICU length of stay. Secondary outcomes included patient, parental, and clinician outcomes. We enrolled 115 parent-patient dyads (231 subjects), 58 patients were randomized into treatment arm and 56 into the UC arm. Thirteen attendings volunteered to serve as CCI, 10 as UC. No association was found between the intervention and patient PICU length of stay (p = 0.5), other clinical factors, or parental outcomes. The intervention met a threshold for feasibility of enrollment, retention, and implementation while the majority of providers agreed the intervention was acceptable with more efficient decision making. Thirty percent CCIs felt the role took too much time, and 20% felt time was not worth the benefits.

Conclusion CCI intervention did not impact patient or family outcomes. PICU attendings believed that the implementation of the CCI program was feasible and acceptable with potential benefits for efficiency of decision making.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 19 September 2021

Accepted: 24 October 2021

Article published online:
23 December 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Namachivayam P, Taylor A, Montague T. et al. Long-stay children in intensive care: long-term functional outcome and quality of life from a 20-yr institutional study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2012; 13 (05) 520-528
  • 2 Namachivayam SP, Alexander J, Slater A. et al; Paediatric Study Group and Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society. Five-year survival of children with chronic critical illness in Australia and New Zealand. Crit Care Med 2015; 43 (09) 1978-1985
  • 3 Peterson-Carmichael SL, Cheifetz IM. The chronically critically ill patient: pediatric considerations. Respir Care 2012; 57 (06) 993-1002 , discussion 1002–1003
  • 4 Marcin JP, Slonim AD, Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE. Long-stay patients in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2001; 29 (03) 652-657
  • 5 Edwards JD, Houtrow AJ, Vasilevskis EE. et al. Chronic conditions among children admitted to U.S. pediatric intensive care units: their prevalence and impact on risk for mortality and prolonged length of stay*. Crit Care Med 2012; 40 (07) 2196-2203
  • 6 Namachivayam P, Shann F, Shekerdemian L. et al. Three decades of pediatric intensive care: who was admitted, what happened in intensive care, and what happened afterward. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2010; 11 (05) 549-555
  • 7 Feudtner C, Christakis DA, Connell FA. Pediatric deaths attributable to complex chronic conditions: a population-based study of Washington State, 1980-1997. Pediatrics 2000; 106 (1 Pt 2): 205-209
  • 8 Studdert DM, Mello MM, Burns JP. et al. Conflict in the care of patients with prolonged stay in the ICU: types, sources, and predictors. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29 (09) 1489-1497
  • 9 Diaz-Caneja A, Gledhill J, Weaver T, Nadel S, Garralda E. A child's admission to hospital: a qualitative study examining the experiences of parents. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31 (09) 1248-1254
  • 10 Colville G, Darkins J, Hesketh J, Bennett V, Alcock J, Noyes J. The impact on parents of a child's admission to intensive care: integration of qualitative findings from a cross-sectional study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2009; 25 (02) 72-79
  • 11 Welch CD, Check J, O'Shea TM. Improving care collaboration for NICU patients to decrease length of stay and readmission rate. BMJ Open Qual 2017; 6 (02) e000130
  • 12 Wocial L, Ackerman V, Leland B. et al. Pediatric Ethics and Communication Excellence (PEACE) rounds: decreasing moral distress and patient length of stay in the PICU. HEC Forum 2017; 29 (01) 75-91
  • 13 Temel JS, Greer JA, Admane S. et al. Longitudinal perceptions of prognosis and goals of therapy in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a randomized study of early palliative care. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29 (17) 2319-2326
  • 14 Contro N, Larson J, Scofield S, Sourkes B, Cohen H. Family perspectives on the quality of pediatric palliative care. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002; 156 (01) 14-19
  • 15 Schneiderman LJ, Gilmer T, Teetzel HD. et al. Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2003; 290 (09) 1166-1172
  • 16 Curtis JR, Treece PD, Nielsen EL. et al. Randomized trial of communication facilitators to reduce family distress and intensity of end-of-life care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193 (02) 154-162
  • 17 Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S. et al; French FAMIREA Group. Meeting the needs of intensive care unit patient families: a multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001; 163 (01) 135-139
  • 18 Baggs JG, Schmitt MH, Prendergast TJ. et al. Who is attending? End-of-life decision making in the intensive care unit. J Palliat Med 2012; 15 (01) 56-62
  • 19 Abbott KH, Sago JG, Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Tulsky JA. Families looking back: one year after discussion of withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining support. Crit Care Med 2001; 29 (01) 197-201
  • 20 DeLemos D, Chen M, Romer A. et al. Building trust through communication in the intensive care unit: HICCC. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2010; 11 (03) 378-384
  • 21 Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM. et al; American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005, Society of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005. Crit Care Med 2007; 35 (02) 605-622
  • 22 Nelson JE, Mercado AF, Camhi SL. et al. Communication about chronic critical illness. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167 (22) 2509-2515
  • 23 Madrigal V, Walter JK, Sachs E, Himebauch AS, Kubis S, Feudtner C. Pediatric continuity care intensivist: a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2019; 76: 72-78
  • 24 VitalTalk. Accessed November 17, 2021 at: http://vitaltalk.org/
  • 25 Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67 (06) 361-370
  • 26 Makoul G, Krupat E, Chang CH. Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the Communication Assessment Tool. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 67 (03) 333-342
  • 27 Epstein D, Unger JB, Ornelas B. et al. Psychometric evaluation of a modified version of the family satisfaction in the ICU survey in parents/caregivers of critically ill children*. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2013; 14 (08) e350-e356
  • 28 Schalet BD, Pilkonis PA, Yu L. et al. Clinical validity of PROMIS Depression, Anxiety, and Anger across diverse clinical samples. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 73: 119-127
  • 29 Cegala DJ, Coleman MT, Turner JW. The development and partial assessment of the medical communication competence scale. Health Commun 1998; 10 (03) 261-288
  • 30 Schmitz CC, Chipman JG, Luxenberg MG, Beilman GJ. Professionalism and communication in the intensive care unit: reliability and validity of a simulated family conference. Simul Healthc 2008; 3 (04) 224-238
  • 31 LaRovere JM, Jeffries HE, Sachdeva RC. et al. Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease–the perspective of critical care. Cardiol Young 2008; 18 (Suppl. 02) 130-136
  • 32 Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. et al; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
  • 33 Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications; 1980
  • 34 Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005; 15 (09) 1277-1288
  • 35 RC T. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. In: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020. Accessed November 17, 2021 at: https://www.r-project.org/
  • 36 Moret L, Nguyen JM, Pillet N, Falissard B, Lombrail P, Gasquet I. Improvement of psychometric properties of a scale measuring inpatient satisfaction with care: a better response rate and a reduction of the ceiling effect. BMC Health Serv Res 2007; 7: 197
  • 37 Ross CK, Steward CA, Sinacore JM. A comparative study of seven measures of patient satisfaction. Med Care 1995; 33 (04) 392-406
  • 38 Salman AA, Kopp BJ, Thomas JE, Ring D, Fatehi A. What are the priming and ceiling effects of one experience measure on another?. J Patient Exp 2020; 7 (06) 1755-1759
  • 39 Shenoi AN, Kalyanaraman M, Pillai A, Raghava PS, Day S. Burnout and psychological distress among pediatric critical care physicians in the United States. Crit Care Med 2018; 46 (01) 116-122