Static Mediolateral Tilt of the Joint Line after Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Reflect Dynamic Tilt during a Stair Ascent Activity

Abstract

The correlation between static and dynamic mediolateral (ML) tilts of the joint line in the coronal plane remains unknown after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose was to evaluate the ML tilt as measured by two-dimensional to three-dimensional registration during stair ascent in TKA patients, and to examine the correlation between the dynamic ML tilt and radiographic measurements of static indices. Thirty-two knees that underwent TKA using the mechanical alignment method were included. Continuous sagittal fluoroscopy was taken from before initial contact (IC) until after the toe-off (TO) phase during the stair ascent. The ML tilt of the tibial component relative to the ground was analyzed in terms of dynamic alignment using image-matching techniques, whereas static alignment was measured using standing long-leg radiographs. The correlation between static and dynamic ML tilts was evaluated. In the fluoroscopic analysis, the joint line was neutral (0.0 degree, standard deviation [SD] = 3.4 degrees) around IC phases, then was tilted valgus (5.5° valgus, SD = 2.6 degrees) in the mid-stance (MS) phase. After the TO phase, the joint line became almost neutral (0.4 degrees valgus, SD = 3.1 degrees). The dynamic ML tilt was significantly more varus during the IC phase and significantly more valgus in MS and TO phases than the static ML tilt (1.4 degrees valgus, SD = 2.0 degrees). No correlation was found between static and dynamic ML tilts in weight-bearing phases. During stair ascent, the static tilt had no correlation with the dynamic tilt in weight-bearing phases despite being in the same range. Static lower limb alignment does not reflect coronal alignment during motion. Further research should be conducted to determine whether the horizontal dynamic ML tilt can improve long-term durability and clinical outcomes after TKA.

Keywords

total knee arthroplasty - coronal alignment - mediolateral tilt - fluoroscopy - kinematics

Publication History

Received: 15 August 2021

Accepted: 16 November 2021

Article published online:
24 December 2021

• References

• 1 Fang DM, Ritter MA, Davis KE. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?. J Arthroplasty 2009; 24 (Suppl 6): 39-43
• 2 Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA. The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (17) 1588-1596
• 3 Abdel MP, Ollivier M, Parratte S, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ, Pagnano MW. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on survival and functional outcomes of modern total knee arthroplasties with cement: a concise follow-up at 20 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2018; 100 (06) 472-478
• 4 Parratte S, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ. Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (12) 2143-2149
• 5 Nakamura S, Tian Y, Tanaka Y. et al. The effects of kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty on stress at the medial tibia: a case study for varus knee. Bone Joint Res 2017; 6 (01) 43-51
• 6 Howell SM, Howell SJ, Kuznik KT, Cohen J, Hull ML. Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471 (03) 1000-1007
• 7 Dossett HG, Estrada NA, Swartz GJ, LeFevre GW, Kwasman BG. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B [phone]
• 8 Matsumoto T, Takayama K, Ishida K, Hayashi S, Hashimoto S, Kuroda R. Radiological and clinical comparison of kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2017; 99-B [phone]
• 9 Waterson HB, Clement ND, Eyres KS, Mandalia VI, Toms AD. The early outcome of kinematic versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised control trial. Bone Joint J 2016; 98-B (10) 1360-1368
• 10 Young SW, Walker ML, Bayan A, Briant-Evans T, Pavlou P, Farrington B. The Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: no difference in 2-year functional outcomes using kinematic versus mechanical alignment in TKA: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017; 475 (01) 9-20
• 11 Mochizuki T, Koga Y, Mori T. et al. Articular surface of the medial proximal tibia is aligned parallel to the ground in three-dimensional space under weight-bearing conditions in healthy and varus osteoarthritic knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28 (10) 3232-3239
• 12 Nakamura S, Kobayashi M, Ito H, Nakamura K, Ueo T, Nakamura T. The Bi-Surface total knee arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up study. Knee 2010; 17 (04) 274-278
• 13 Larose G, Fuentes A, Lavoie F, Aissaoui R, de Guise J, Hagemeister N. Can total knee arthroplasty restore the correlation between radiographic mechanical axis angle and dynamic coronal plane alignment during gait?. Knee 2019; 26 (03) 586-594
• 14 Kobayashi K, Tanaka N, Odagawa K. et al. Image-based matching for natural knee kinematics measurement using single-plane fluoroscopy. J Japanese Soc Experiment Mech 2009; 9: 162-166
• 15 Nakamura S, Sharma A, Ito H, Nakamura K, Komistek RD. In vivo femoro-tibial kinematic analysis of a tri-condylar total knee prosthesis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2014; 29 (04) 400-405
• 16 Ishikawa M, Kuriyama S, Ito H, Furu M, Nakamura S, Matsuda S. Kinematic alignment produces near-normal knee motion but increases contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: a case study on a single implant design. Knee 2015; 22 (03) 206-212
• 17 Nakamura S, Sharma A, Nakamura K. et al. In vivo kinematic effects of ball and socket third condyle as a post-cam mechanism in tri-condylar knee implants. Knee 2015; 22 (03) 237-242
• 18 Nakamura S, Sharma A, Nakamura K, Ikeda N, Zingde SM, Komistek RD. Can post-cam function be replaced by addition of a third condyle in PS TKA?. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (09) 1871-1876
• 19 Tanaka Y, Nakamura S, Kuriyama S. et al. Intraoperative physiological lateral laxity in extension and flexion for varus knees did not affect short-term clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2020; 28 (12) 3888-3898
• 20 Akagi M, Oh M, Nonaka T, Tsujimoto H, Asano T, Hamanishi C. An anteroposterior axis of the tibia for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (420) 213-219
• 21 Grood ES, Suntay WJ. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 1983; 105 (02) 136-144
• 22 Murakami K, Hamai S, Okazaki K. et al. Preoperative tibial mechanical axis orientation and articular surface design influence on the coronal joint line orientation relative to the ground during gait after total knee arthroplasties. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018; 26 (11) 3368-3376
• 23 Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat Award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470 (01) 45-53
• 24 Victor JM, Bassens D, Bellemans J, Gürsu S, Dhollander AA, Verdonk PC. Constitutional varus does not affect joint line orientation in the coronal plane. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014; 472 (01) 98-104
• 25 Tanaka Y, Nakamura S, Kuriyama S. et al. Medial tilting of the joint line in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty increases contact force and stress. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2018; 53: 54-59