Endoscopy 2016; 48(06): 552-556
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-101853
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Outcomes of double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy tube placement

Badr Al-Bawardy
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
,
Emmanuel C. Gorospe
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
,
Jeffrey A. Alexander
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
,
David H. Bruining
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
,
Nayantara Coelho-Prabhu
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
,
Elizabeth Rajan
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
,
Louis M. Wong Kee Song
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 02 August 2015

accepted after revision 28 December 2015

Publication Date:
10 March 2016 (online)

Background and study aims: In a large series, conventional direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ) tube placement with push endoscopes failed in approximately one-third of patients. In a pilot study, double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE)-assisted DPEJ tube placement was successful in all patients in whom attempted conventional DPEJ had failed. The study aim was to assess the technical success of and adverse events related to DBE-DPEJ tube placement in a large cohort of patients.

Patients and methods: The medical records of all patients who underwent DBE-DPEJ tube placement between July 2010 and November 2013 were reviewed using a prospectively maintained electronic database. Data were abstracted for patient demographics, indications for DPEJ, gut anatomy, technical success rate, causes of failure, and adverse events.

Results: The study comprised a total of 94 patients (39 men; mean age 56 years; body mass index [BMI] 23 ± 6.4 kg/m2). The most common indication for DPEJ was gastroparesis (n = 29). Altered gut anatomy was present in 36 patients (38 %). DBE-DPEJ tube placement was technically successful in 87 patients (93 %). The mean procedure duration was 33 minutes (range 15 – 88). DBE-DPEJ tube placement failed in seven patients (7 %), primarily because of limited instrument advancement in the setting of presumed surgical adhesions. Post-procedural adverse events occurred in eight patients (9 %), with one serious adverse event, which was a gastric interposition requiring surgical repair.

Conclusions: Compared with the published outcomes of DPEJ by conventional endoscopy, DBE-DPEJ tube placement was technically successful in a high proportion of patients (93 %) and with a relatively low rate of significant adverse events.

 
  • References

  • 1 Shike M, Schroy P, Ritchie MA et al. Percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy in cancer patients with previous gastric resection. Gastrointest Endosc 1987; 33: 372-374
  • 2 Zhu Y, Shi L, Tang H et al. Current considerations of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy. Can J Gastroenterol 2012; 26: 92-96
  • 3 Fan AC, Baron TH, Rumalla A et al. Comparison of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy and PEG with jejunal extension. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 890-894
  • 4 Rumalla A, Baron TH. Results of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy, an alternative method for providing jejunal feeding. Mayo Clin Proc 2000; 75: 807-810
  • 5 Panagiotakis PH, DiSario JA, Hilden K et al. DPEJ tube placement prevents aspiration pneumonia in high-risk patients. Nutr Clin Pract 2008; 23: 172-175
  • 6 Kwon RS, Banerjee S, Desilets D et al. Enteral nutrition access devices. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 236-248
  • 7 Maple JT, Petersen BT, Baron TH et al. Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy: outcomes in 307 consecutive attempts. Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100: 2681-2688
  • 8 Wong Kee Song LM, Baron TH, Saleem A et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy as a rescue technique for failed direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy when using conventional push enteroscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76: 675-679
  • 9 Despott EJ, Gabe S, Tripoli E et al. Enteral access by double-balloon enteroscopy: an alternative method of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy placement. Dig Dis Sci 2011; 56: 494-498
  • 10 Foutch PG, Talbert GA, Waring JP et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in patients with prior abdominal surgery: virtues of the safe tract. Am J Gastroenterol 1988; 83: 147-150
  • 11 Varadarajulu S, Delegge MH. Use of a 19-gauge injection needle as a guide for direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy tube placement. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 942-945
  • 12 Baron TH. Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 1407-1409
  • 13 Aktas H, Mensink PB, Kuipers EJ et al. Single-balloon enteroscopy-assisted direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 210-212
  • 14 Monkemuller K, Vormbrock K, Kassalik M et al. Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy tube placement using double-balloon enteroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 463-465
  • 15 Velazquez-Avina J, Beyer R, Diaz-Tobar CP et al. New method of direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy tube placement using balloon-assisted enteroscopy with fluoroscopy. Dig Endosc 2015; 27: 317-322
  • 16 Balmadrid B, Ross A. Severe laceration in a percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy placement resolved with over-the-scope clips. Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 78: 783-784 ; discussion 784 – 785