Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2016; 125(03): 88-95
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-102606
Fortbildung – Endodontologie
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Der FragRemover – ein Werkzeug zur minimalinvasiven Fragmententfernung

M. Leineweber
1   Radebeul
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 April 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Für die Entfernung von Fremdkörpern aus Wurzelkanälen haben sich verschiedene Methoden etabliert. Der Indikationsbereich vieler dieser Techniken ist jedoch begrenzt. Eine Weiterentwicklung der Schlingentechnik erlaubt es, Fragmente unter ständiger Sicht durch das Operationsmikroskop sicher zu fassen und aus dem Wurzelkanal zu entfernen. Der geringe Raumbedarf der verwendeten Kanülen und ultrafeinen Drähte ermöglicht die substanzschonende Entfernung auch von Fragmenten im apikalen Wurzeldrittel. Besonders für längere Fragmente mit hohem Risiko für Sekundärfrakturen stellt diese Methode eine sinnvolle Alternative zur ausschließlichen Verwendung der Ultraschalltechnik dar. Die Einsatzmöglichkeiten des FragRemovers (Anm. d. Red.: Eigenentwicklung des Autors) sollen durch Fallberichte veranschaulicht werden.

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Sjögren U, Hägglund B, Sundqvist G et al. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990; 16: 498-504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Madarati AA, Watts DC, Qualtrough AJ. Opinions and attidudes of endodontists and general dental practitioners in the UK towards the intracanal fracture of endodontic instruments: Part1. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 693-701
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Suter B, Lussi A, Sequeira P. Probably of removing fractured instruments from root canals. Int Endod J 2005; 38: 112-123
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cuje J, Bargholz C, Hülsmann M. The outcome of retained instrument removal in a specialist practice. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 545-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Navares G Cunha RS, Zuolo ML et al. Success rates for removing or bypassing fractured instruments: a prospective study. J Endod 2012; 38: 442-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Parashos P, Gordon I, Messer HH. Factors influencing defects of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments after clinical use. J Endod 2006; 32: 1031-1043
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Grossman LI. Fate of endodontically treated teeth with fractured root canal instruments. J Brit Endod Soc 1968; 2: 35-37
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod 2005; 31: 845-850
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hülsmann M. Methods for removing metal obstructions from the root canal. Endod Dent Traumatol 1993; 9: 223-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Fildermann J. Die Beseitigung von Bruchstücken von in den Wurzelkanälen abgebrochenen Instrumenten. Zahnärztl Rdsch 1935; 44: 73-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Schwartz M. The prevention and management of the broken curet. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19: 418-420 422, 424–425
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Yu DG, Kimura Y, Tomita Y et al. Study on removal effects of filling materials and broken files from root canals using pulsed Nd:YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2000; 18: 23-28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ebihara A, Takashina M, Anjo T et al. Removal of root canal obstructions using pulsed Nd: YAG laser. ICS Lasers in Dentistry 2003; 1248: 257-259
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Feldman G, Solomon C, Notaro P et al. Retrieving broken endodontic instruments. J Am Dent Assoc 1974; 88: 588-591
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Panitvisai P, Parunnit P, Sathorn C et al. Impact of a retained instrument on treatment outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod 2010; 36: 775-780
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Nagai O, Tani N, Kayaba Y et al. Ultrasonic removal of broken instruments in root canals. Int Endod J 1986; 19: 298-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ruddle CJ. Nonsurgical retreatment. J Endod 2004; 30: 827-845
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Friedman S, Stabholz A, Tamse A. Endodontic retreatment: case selection and technique-3: retreatment techniques. J Endod 1990; 16: 543-549
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Yoldas O, Oztunc H, Tinaz C et al. Perforation risks associated with the use of Masserann endodontic kit drills in mandibular molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004; 97: 513-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Briggs PF, Gulabivala K, Setchell DJ. Dentine-removing? characteristics of K-files energized by the Piezon-Endo. Int Endod J 1992; 25: 6-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Ruddle C. Microendodontics: Eliminating intracanal obstructions. Oral Health 1997; 87: 19-21 23–24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Terauchi Y, O’Leary L, Yoshioka T et al. Comparison of the time required to create secondary fracture of separated file fragments by using ultrasonic vibration under various canal conditions. J Endod 2013; 39: 1300-1305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Roig-Green JL. The retrieval of foreign objects from root canals: A simple aid. J Endod 1983; 9: 394-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 D’Addazio PS, Campos CN, Özcan M et al. A comparative study between cone- beam computed tomography and periapical radiographs in the diagnosis of simulated endodontic complications. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 218-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Yoshioka T, Kikuchi I, Adorno CG et al. Periapical bone defects of root filled teeth with persistent lesions evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2011; 44: 245-252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Gao Y, Peters OA, Wu H et al. An application framework of three-dimensional reconstruction and measurement for endodontic research. J Endod 2009; 35: 269-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Terauchi Y, O’Leary L, Kicuchi I et al. Evaluation of the efficiency of a new file removal system in comparison with two conventional systems. J Endod 2007; 33: 585-588
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar