Download PDF
Dialyse aktuell 2016; 20(09): 455-459
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-119130
Dialyse
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Hämodialyse vs. Peritonealdialyse

Auswirkungen der Wahl des Nierenersatzverfahrens auf das Langzeitüberleben von DialysepatientenHemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis – Impact of the choice of the renal replacement therapy modalities on long-term survival of dialysis patients
Marianne Haag-Weber
1   Sektion Nephrologie, Klinikum Straubing (Leitende Ärztin Sektion Nephrologie: Prof. Dr. Marianne Haag-Weber)
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 November 2016 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Hämodialyse (HD) und Peritonealdialyse (PD) sind 2 gleichwertige, aber unterschiedliche Verfahren. In den letzten 25 Jahren hat sich das Langzeitüberleben der Dialysepatienten trotz der Zunahme des Alters und der Komorbiditäten verbessert. Während die PD in den 1980er-Jahren im Vergleich zur HD eine deutlich höhere Mortalität aufwies, sind die Mortalitätsraten von HD und PD seit 2002 vergleichbar. Grund dafür ist, dass es bei der PD in den letzten Jahren in der Therapie mehr Veränderungen gab als bei der HD. Bei der PD entwickelte sich ein verstärktes Bewusstsein für eine Optimierung des Volumenmanagements. Dies wurde erleichtert durch eine differenziertere Therapie mit dem Einsatz von Cyclern bei High-Transportern und der Verwendung von Icodextrin. Während bei der HD die dialyseassoziierten Infektionen insbesondere auch durch eine höhere Rate an Vorhofkathetern gestiegen sind, hat sich die PD-assoziierte Infektionsrate kontinuierlich verbessert. Die Hospitalisierungsraten aufgrund von dialyseassoziierten Infektionen sind mittlerweile vergleichbar. Es besteht in den Studien ein Trend für ein etwas besseres Patientenüberleben in den ersten Jahren bei einem Dialysebeginn mit der PD. Entscheidend für die Auswahl des Verfahrens sollte jedoch die Lebensqualität des Patienten sein.

Hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are 2 equivalent, but different modalities. Despite of an increased age and more comorbidities, survival of both HD and PD patients has improved over the last 25 years. Whereas mortality of PD patients compared to HD patients was higher 30 years ago, survival rate is comparable between these 2 modalities since 2002. Substantial changes in the practice of PD occured in the last decades. Better fluid control was achieved by using APD und icodextrin, especially by patients with fast peritoneal transport. Whereas there was a continuous improvement of PD-associated infections, dialysis-associated infection rates by HD patients increased due to a higher rate of central venous catheter. Hospitalization due to dialysis-associated infections are meanwhile comparable. There is a trend for better survival on PD compared to HD during the first years after start of dialysis. A key criterion for choosing the modality should be quality of life.

Key words

hemodialysis - peritoneal dialysis - mortality - long-term survival
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Heaf JG, Løkkegaard H, Madsen M. Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to hemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002; 12: 2411-2417
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Termorshiuzen F, Korevaar JC, Dekker FW et al. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: comparison of adjusted mortality according to the duration of dialysis: analysis of The Netherland Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis 2. J Am Soc Nedphrol 2003; 14: 2851-2860
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Liem YS, Wong JB, Hunink MG et al. Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis survival in The Netherlands. Kidney Int 2007; 71: 153-158
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Weinhandl ED, Foley RN, Gilbertson DT et al. Propensity-matched mortality comparison of incident hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010; 21: 499-506
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Lukowsky LR, Mehrotra R, Kheifets L et al. Comparing mortality of peritoneal and hemodialysis patients in the first 2 years of dialysis therapy: a marginal structural model analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 8: 619-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Yeates K, Zhu N, Vonesh E et al. Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis are associated with similar outcomes for end-stage renal disease treatment in Canada. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2013; 27: 3568-3578
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Perl J, Wald R, McFarlane P et al. Hemodialysis vascular access modifies differential mortality between dialysis modality. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 22: 1113-1121
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Quinn RR, Hux JE, Oliver MJ et al. Selection bias explains apparent differential mortality between dialysis modalities. J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 22: 1534-1542
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kumar VA, Sidell MA, Jones JP, Vonesh EF. Survival of propensity matched incident peritoneal and hemodialysis patients in a United States health care system. Kidney Int 2014; 86: 1016-1022
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Lee MB, Bargman JM. Survival by dialysis modality-who cares?. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2016; 11: 1083-1087
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mehrotra R, Chiu YW, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Vonesh E. The outcomes of continuous ambulatory and automated peritoneal dialysis are similar. Kidney Int 2009; 76: 97-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 van de Luijtgaarden MW, Jager KJ, Segelmark M et al Trends in dialysis modality choice and related patient survival in the ERA-EDTA-Registry over a 20-year period. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016; 31: 120-128
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Heaf JG, Wehberg S. Relative survival of peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis patients: effect of cohort and mode of dialysis initiation. PLoS One 2014; 9: e90119
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rocco MV, Lockridge RS, Beck GJ et al. The effects of frequent nocturnal home hemodialysis: the Frequent Hemodialysis Network Trial. Kidney Int 2011; 80: 1080-1091
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Thumfart J, Pommer W, Querfeld U, Müller D. Intensified hemodialysis in adults and in children and adolescents. Dtsch Ärzteblatt Int 2014; 14: 237-243
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Ateş K, Nergizoğlu G, Keven K et al Effect of fluid and sodium removal on mortality in peritoneal dialysis patients. Kidney Int 2001; 60: 767-776
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lin X, Lin A, Ni Z et al. Daily peritoneal ultrafiltration predicts patient and technique survival in anuric peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 2322-2327
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Dombros N, Dratwa M, Feriani M et al. EBPG Expert Group. on Peritoneal Dialysis European best practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis. 7 Adequacy of peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005; 20 (Suppl. 09) ix24-ix27
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Blake PG, Bargman JM, Brimble KS et al. Clinical practice guidelines and recommendations on peritoneal dialysis adequacy 2011. Perit Dial Int 2011; 31: 218-239
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Davies SJ. Overfill or ultrafiltration? We need to be clear. Perit Dial Int 2006; 26: 449-451
    Google Scholar
  • 21 La Milia V, Pozzoni P, Crepaldi M, Locatelli F. Overfill of peritoneal dialysis bags as a cause of underestimation of ultrafiltration failure. Perit Dial Int 2006; 26: 503-505
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Johnson DW, Brown FG, Clarke M et al. Superior survival of high-transporters with automated versus continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25: 1973-1979
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Davies SJ, Brown EA, Frandsen RE et al. EAPOS Group. Longitudinal membrane function in functionally anuric patients treated with APD: Data from EAPOS on the effects of glucose and icodextrin prescription. Kidney Int 2005; 67: 1609-1615
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 del Peso G, Jiménez-Heffernan JA, Selgas R et al Biocompatible dialysis solutions preserve peritoneal mesothelial cell and vessel integrity. A case control study on human biopsies. Perit Dial Int 2016; 36: 129-134
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Kawanishi K, Honda K, Tsukada M et al. Neutral solutions low in glucose degradation products is associated with less peritoneal fibrosis and vascular sclerosis in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 2013; 33: 242-251
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Qamar M, Sheth H, Bender FH, Piraino B. Clinical outcomes in peritoneal dialysis: impact of continuous quality provement initiatives. Adv Perit Dial 2009; 25: 76-79
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Campbell DJ, Brown FG, Craig JC et al. Assessment of current practice and barriers to antimicrobial prophylaxis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016; 31: 619-627
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar