Download PDF
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2018; 235(02): 180-190
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-119399
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Derzeitiger Stand der elektronischen „kontinuierlichen“ Augendruckmessung

Current Status of Electronic “Continuous” Eye Pressure Measurements
C. Faschinger
Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Universität Graz, Österreich
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 27 September 2016

akzeptiert 11 October 2016

Publication Date:
13 January 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Der intraokulare Druck (IOD) wird üblicherweise punktuell und meist 1-mal, selten mehrmals, während der Ordinationszeiten im Sitzen mit unterschiedlichen Geräten gemessen. Für Diagnostik, Progressionsbeurteilung und Therapieentscheidung bei Glaukomen kann dies zu wenig sein, da der IOD kein statischer Messwert ist, sondern über kurze und lange Zeitabschnitte unterschiedlich hohen Schwankungen (Fluktuationen) unterliegt. Deshalb ist der Wunsch nach häufigerer oder sogar kontinuierlicher Messung gerechtfertigt. Dies kann mit Selbsttonometern erfolgen (wird in dieser Übersicht nicht diskutiert) oder mittels elektronischer Hilfsmittel wie Sensoren im Auge (invasiv; in Intraokularlinse, im Sulcus ciliaris, auf der Iris, in der Hinter- oder Vorderkammer, suprachorioidal oder subkonjuktival) bzw. auf dem Auge (nicht invasiv; Sensorkontaktlinse) verwirklicht werden. Trotz zahlreicher technischer Errungenschaften und Miniaturisierungen gibt es noch keine routinemäßig anwendbare kontinuierliche Messtechnik (weder invasiv noch nicht invasiv), die Entwicklung dahin ist jedoch bereits weit fortgeschritten.

Abstract

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is generally measured at individual points and usually only once, but rarely more often, during office hours and with various different instruments. This is probably inadequate for diagnosis, assessment of progression, and therapeutic decision making, since the IOP is not a static measurement, but rather one that is subject to greater or lesser fluctuations over shorter or longer periods. This has prompted the desire for more regular or even continuous measurements. This can be achieved with self-tonometers (not discussed in this article) or by using electronic aids with sensors in the eye (invasive; in the intraocular lens, in the ciliary sulcus, on the iris, in the posterior or anterior chamber, suprachoroidal or subconjunctival) or on the eye (non-invasive; sensor contact lens). Despite numerous advances and miniaturisations, there is as yet still no continuous measurement technique (either invasive or non-invasive) that can be used routinely, but development of such a device is at an advanced stage.

Schlüsselwörter

Sensoren - elektronische Augendruckmessung - Augeninnendruck

Key words

intraocular pressure - sensors - electronic intraocular pressure measurement
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Rüfer F. Fehlerquellen bei der Goldmann Applanationstonometrie. Ophthalmologe 2011; 108: 546-552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Stamper RL. A history of intraocular pressure and its measurement. Optom Vis Sci 2011; 88: E16-E28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Liu JHK, Kripke DF, Hoffman RE. et al. Nocturnal elevation of intraocular pressure in young adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1998; 39: 2707-2712
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Liu JHK, Kripke F, Twa M. et al. Twenty-four-hour pattern of intraocular pressure in the aging population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40: 2912-2917
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Grippo TM, Liu JHK, Zebardast N. et al. Twenty-four-hour pattern of intraocular pressure in untreated patients with ocular hypertension. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013; 54: 512-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Liu JHK, Zhang X, Kripke DF. et al. Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure pattern associated with early glaucomatous changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003; 44: 1586-1590
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Leidl MC, Choi CJ, Syed ZA. et al. Intraocular pressure fluctuation and glaucoma progression: what do we know?. Br J Ophthalmol 2014; 98: 1315-1319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gautam N. Postural and diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2016; 100: 537-541
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Yao H, Shum AJ, Cowan M. et al. A contact lens with embedded sensor for monitoring tear glucose level. Biosens Bioelectron 2011; 26: 3290-3296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ittoop SM, SooHoo JR, Seibold LK. et al. Systematic review of current devices for 24-h intraocular pressure monitoring. Adv Ther 2016; 33: 1679-1690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yung E, Trubnik V, Katz LJ. An overview of home tonometry and telemetry for intraocular pressure monitoring in humans. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014; 252: 1179-1188
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 McLaren JW, Brubaker RF, FitzSimon JS. Continuous measurement of intraocular pressure in rabbits by telemetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37: 966-975
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Downs JC, Burgoyne CF, Seigfreid WP. et al. 24-hour IOP telemetry in the nonhuman primate: Implant system performance and initial characterization of IOP at multiple timescales. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 7365-7375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Svedbergh B, Bäcklund Y, Hök B. et al. The IOP-IOL. A probe into the eye. Acta Ophthalmol 1992; 70: 266-268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kreiner CF, Streufert D. Intraokulares Drucksensorsystem zur kontinuierlichen Messung des Augeninnendrucks. Biomed Tech 2002; 47 (Suppl. 01) S179-S180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Draeger J, Hille K. Kontinuierliche intraokulare Tonometrie mit telemetrischer Übertragung. Spektrum Augenheilkd 2000; 14: 141-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hille K, Draeger J, Eggers T. et al. Technischer Aufbau, Kalibirierung und Ergebnisse mit einem neuen intraokularen Drucksensor mit telemetrischer Übertragung. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2001; 218: 376-380
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Araci IE, Su B, Quake SR. et al. An implantable microfluid device for self-monitoring of intraocular pressure. Nat Med 2014; 20: 1074-1079
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Meyer C. Sklera-Sensor. Im Internet: https://www.google.com/patents/WO2012025415A3?cl=en&dq=Implandata&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiOrIOZ6MjQAhXKCMAKHXo_AO8Q6AEILTAC Stand: 27.11.2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Todani A, Behlau I, Fava MA. et al. Intraocular pressure measurement by radio wave telemetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 9573-9580
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Paschalis EI, Cade F, Melki S. et al. Reliable intraocular pressure measurement using automated radio-wave telemetry. Clin Ophthalmol 2014; 8: 177-185
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Melki S, Todani A, Cherfan G. et al. An implantable intraocular pressure transducer, initial safety outcomes. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014; 132: 1221-1225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Koutsonas A, Walter P, Roessler G. et al. Implantation of a novel telemetric intraocular pressure sensor in patients with glaucoma (ARGOS Study): 1-year results. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2015; 56: 1063-1069
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Koutsonas A, Walter P, Plange N. Selbsttonometrie mit einem telemetrischen, intraokularen Drucksensor bei Patienten mit Glaukom. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2016; 233: 743-748
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 [Anonymous] Safety and performance study of the ARGOS-IO (intraocular) system in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02434692. Im Internet: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=%2522ARGOS-IO%2522+AND+%2522POAG%2522&Search=Search Stand: 08.12.2016
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Neuhann T. IOP Sensor implanted during keratoprothesis procedure in Europe. Cat Refr Surg Today Europe 2015; 4: 12-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Piffaretti F, Barrettino D. Rollable and implantable intraocular pressure sensor for the continuous adaptive management of glaucoma. 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE EMBS Osaka, 3 – 7 July, 2013, 31983201.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Lin KM, Sant HJ, Ambati BK. et al. Intraocular pressure sensors: new approaches for real-time intraocular pressure measurement using a purely microfluid chip. Proc. 16th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences. Oct 28–Nov 1, 2012, Okinawa, Japan. 731-733
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mariacher S, Ebner M, Januschowski K. et al. Investigation of a novel implantable suprachoroidal pressure sensor transducer for telemetric intraocular pressure monitoring. Exp Eye Res 2016; 151: 54-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Rizq RN, Choi WH, Wright MM. et al. IOP measurement at the choroid surface: a feasibility study with implications for implantable microsystems. Br J Ophthalmol 2001; 85: 868-871
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Chitnis G, Maleki T, Samuels B. et al. A minimally invasive implantable wireless pressure sensor for continuous IOP monitoring. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2013; 60: 250-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Chen PJ, Rodger DC, Argawal R. et al. Implantable micromechanical parylene-based pressure sensors for unpowered intraocular pressure sensing. J Micromech Microeng 2007; 17: 1931-1938
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ghaed MH, Ghahramani MM, Chen G. et al. Low power wireless sensor networks for infrastructure monitoring. Proc SPIE 2012; 8347: 1-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Chen G, Ghaed H, Haque R. et al. A Cubic-Millimeter Energy-Autonomous Wireless Intraocular Pressure Monitor. 2011 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. 310-311
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Lee Y, Kim G, Bang S. et al. A modular 1 mm3 die-stacked sensing platform with optical communication and multi-modal energy harvesting. 2012 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. 402-403
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kim YW, Park KH, Jeoung JW. et al. Preliminary study on implantable inductive-type sensor for continuous monitoring of intraocular pressure. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 43: 830-837
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Farandos NM, Yetisen AK, Monteiro MJ. et al. Contact lens sensors in ocular diagnostics. Adv Healthc Mater 2015; 4: 792-810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Sanchez I, Laukin V, Moya A. et al. Prototype of a nanostructured sensing contact lens for noninvasive intraocular pressure monitoring. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 8310-8315
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Laukin V, Sanchez I, Moya A. et al. Non-invasive intraocular pressure monitoring with a contact lens engineered with a nanostructured polymeric sensing film. Sens Actuators A 2011; 170: 36-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Hediger A, Kniestedt C, Zweifel S. et al. Kontinuierliche Augendruckmessung. Ophthalmologe 2009; 106: 1111-1115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Twa MD, Roberts CJ, Karol HJ. et al. Evaluation of a contact lens-embedded sensor for IOP measurement. J Glaucoma 2010; 19: 382-390
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Tissot L. Im Internet: http://actu.epfl.ch/news/an-innovative-contact-lens-for-glaucoma/ Stand: 24.08.2016
    PubMed
  • 43 Chen GZ, Chan IS, Lam DCC. Capacitive contact lens sensor for continuous non-invasive intraocular pressure monitoring. Sens Actuators A 2013; 203: 112-118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Chen GZ, Chan IS, Leung LK. et al. Soft wearable contact lens sensor for continuous intraocular pressure monitoring. Med Eng Phys 2014; 36: 1134-1139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Chiou JC, Hsu SH, Liao YT. et al. Toward a wirelessly-powered on-lens intraocular monitoring system. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2016; 20: 1216-1224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Leonardi M, Pitchon EM, Bertsch A. et al. Wireless contact lens sensor for intraocular pressure monitoring: assessment on enucleated pig eyes. Acta Ophthalmol 2009; 87: 433-437
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Greene ME, Gilman BG. Intraocular pressure measurement with instrumented contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol 1974; 13: 299-302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Im Internet: http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm489308.htm Stand: 17.08.2016
    PubMed
  • 49 Tojo N, Hayashi A, Otsuka M. et al. Fluctuations of the intraocular pressure in pseudoexfoliation syndrome and normal eyes measured by a contact lens sensor. J Glaucoma 2016; 25: e463-e468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Faschinger C, Mossböck G, Krainz S. Validität und Reproduzierbarkeit von Sensorkontaktlinsen-Profilen im Vergleich zur Applanationstonometrie bei gesunden Augen. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2012; 229: 1209-1214
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Faschinger C, Mossböck G. Validity of the results of a contact lens sensor?. JAMA Ophthalmol 2013; 131: 696-697
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Hollo G, Kothy P, Vargha P. Evaluation of continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring for assessment of prostaglandin-induced pressure reduction in glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2014; 23: e6-e12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Agnifili L, Mastropasqua R, Frezzotti P. et al. Circadian intraocular pressure patterns in healthy subjects, primary open angle and normal tension glaucoma patients with a contact lens sensor. Acta Ophthalmol 2015; 93: e14-e21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 De Moraes CG, Jasien JV, Simon-Zoula S. et al. Visual field change and 24-hour IOP-related profile with a contact lens sensor in treated glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology 2016; 123: 744-753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Faschinger C, Mossböck G, Strohmaier C. et al. [24-hour “intraocular pressure” measurement with sensory contact lens Triggerfish: from euphoria to disillusion]. Spektrum Augenheilkd 2011; 25: 262-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Hjortdal JO, Jensen PK. In-vivo Measurement of corneal strain, thickness, and curvature using digital image-processing. Acta Ophthal Scand 1995; 73: 5-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Lam AK, Douthwaite WA. The effect of an artificially elevated intraocular pressure on the central corneal curvature. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1997; 17: 18-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Matsumoto T, Nagata R, Saishin M. et al. Measurement by holographic interferometry of the deformation of the eye accompanying changes in intraocular pressure. Appl Opt 1978; 17: 3538-3539
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Sunaric-Megevand G, Leuenberger P, Preußner PR. Assessment of the Triggerifsh contact lens sensor for measurement of intraocular pressure variations. Acta Ophthalmol 2014; 92: e414-e416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Whitford C, Joda A, Jones S. et al. Ex vivo testing of intact globe eyes under inflation conditions to determine regional variation of mechanical stiffness. Eye Vis (Lond) 2016; 3: 21-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Pierscionek PK, Asejczyk-Widlicka M, Schachar RA. The effect of changing intraocular pressure on the corneal and scleral curvatures in the fresh porcine eye. Br J Ophthalmol 2007; 91: 801-803
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Ariza-Gracia MA, Zurita JF, Pinero DP. et al. Coupled biomechanical response of the cornea assessed by non-contact tonometry. A simulation study. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0121486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Scarcelli G, Besner S, Pineda R. et al. In vivo biomechanical mapping of normal and keratoconic corneas. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015; 133: 480-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Shin TJ, Vito RP, Johnson LW. et al. The distribution of strain in the human cornea. J Biomech 1997; 30: 497-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Lewis PN, White TL, Young RD. et al. Three-dimensional arrangement of elastic fibers in the human corneal stroma. Exp Eye Res 2016; 146: 43-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Faschinger CW, Rabensteiner DF, Mossböck G. How do temperature variations influence the signal in the Triggerfish contact lens sensor?. Spektrum Augenheilkd 2014; 28: 197-204
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Flatau A, Solano F, Idrees S. et al. Measured changes in limbal strain during simulated sleep in face down position using an instrumented contact lens in healthy adults and adults with glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol 2016; 134: 375-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Tojo N, Abe S, Miyakoshi M. et al. Correlation between short-term and long-term intraocular pressure fluctuation in glaucoma patients. Clin Ophthalmol 2016; 10: 1713-1717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Tseng CK, Huang YC, Tsai SW. et al. Design and fabricate of a contact lens sensor with a micro-inductor embedded for intraocular pressure monitoring. Sensors IEEE 2012; 1-4 doi:10.1109/ICSENS.2012.6411234
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Auvray P, Rousseau L, Lissorgues G. et al. A passive pressure sensor for continuously measuring the intraocular pressure in glaucomatous patients. IRBM 2012; 33: 117-122
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Mansouri K, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Effect of glaucoma medications on 24-hour intraocular pressure-related patterns using a contact lens sensor. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015; 43: 787-795
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Kazemi A, McLaren JW, Sit AJ. Continuous monitoring of intraocular pressure: An overview of new techniques. Curr Ophthalmol Rep 2015; 3: 58-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Göbel K, Rüfer F, Erb C. Physiologie der Kammerwasserproduktion sowie der Tagesdruckschwankungen und deren Bedeutung für das Glaukom. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2011; 228: 104-108
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Liu JHK. Diurnal Measurement of Intraocular Pressure. J Glaucoma 2001; 10 (Suppl. 01) S39-S41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Liu JHK, Mansouri K, Weinreb RN. Estimation of 24-hour intraocular pressure peak timing and variation using a contact lens sensor. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0129529
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Mansouri K, Weinreb RN, Liu JHK. Efficacy of a contact lens sensor for monitoring 24-h intraocular pressure related patterns. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0125530
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Hughes E, Spry P, Diamond J. 24-hour monitoring of intraocular pressure in glaucoma management: A retrospective review. J Glaucoma 2003; 12: 232-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Moodie J, Wilde C, Rotchford AP. et al. 24-hour versus daytime intraocular pressure phasing in the management of patients with treated glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 999-1002
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Schiefer U, Meisner C, Ziemssen F. 24-hour intraocular pressure phasing remains an important tool in glaucoma diagnostics. Br J Ophthalmol 2011; 95: 594
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Farandos NM, Yetisen AK, Monteiro MJ. et al. Contact lens sensors in ocular diagnostics. Adv Healthc Mater 2015; 4: 792-810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar