Diabetes aktuell 2016; 14(07): 321-326
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-119629
Schwerpunkt
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Antidiabetische Therapie und kardiovaskuläre Prognose

Kritischer Einsatz der Substanzen gefordertAntidiabetic therapy and cardiovascular prognosis - Critical use of pharmacological treatments is mandatory
Thomas Forst
1   Profil Institut für Stoffwechselforschung Neuss
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 November 2016 (online)

Insulin, Metformin und Sulfonylharnstoffe gelten als etablierte Substanzen zur Therapie des Diabetes mellitus Typ 2. Die verfügbaren wissenschaftlichen Daten zu kardiovaskulären Effekten dieser Substanzen sind jedoch lückenhaft. Während für Metformin ein kardiovaskulär protektiver Effekt angenommen wird, sind die kardiovaskulären Effekte von Insulin und Sulfonylharnstoffen Gegenstand kontroverser Diskussionen. Zahlreiche neue Medikamente wie DPP-4-Inhibitoren, GLP-1-Rezeptoragonisten und SGLT2-Inhibitoren wurden in den vergangenen Jahren für die Therapie des Diabetes mellitus zugelassen und haben das Spektrum der pharmakologischen Interventionsmöglichkeiten erheblich erweitert. Inzwischen liegen für einige Medikamente dieser Substanzklassen erste positive Endpunktstudien vor, die kardioprotektive Eigenschaften belegen.

Even if the scientific evidence about cardiovascular effects of insulin, metformin and sulfonylurea is weak, these drugs are considered as the best established pharmacological treatments for patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. While metformin is widely perceived as a drug with cardioprotective effects, insulin and sulfonylurea are the topic of controversial debates. Recently, numerous new drugs like DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of diabetes mellitus type 2. With them the pharmacological armamentarium for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus has been markedly expanded. Recently, first studies reported a positive cardiovascular outcome with some of the new molecules.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 [No authors listed] Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). UK Prospektive Diabetes Study Group. Lancet 1998; 352: 854-865
  • 2 Saenz A, Fernandez-Esteban I, Mataix A et al Metformin monotherapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005 9. CD002966
  • 3 Fung CS, Wan EY, Wong CK et al Effect of metformin monotherapy on cardiovascular diseases and mortality: a retrospective cohort study on Chinese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2015; 14: 137
  • 4 Eurich DT, McAlister FA, Blackburn DF et al Benefits and harms of antidiabetic agents in patients with diabetes and heart failure: systematic review. BMJ 2007; 335: 497
  • 5 Lamanna C, Monami M, Marchionni N, Mannucci E. Effect of metformin on cardiovascular events and mortality: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Diabetes Obes Metab 2011; 13: 221-228
  • 6 Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA et al Glycemic durability of rosiglitazone, metformin, or glyburide monotherapy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2427-2443
  • 7 Hemmingsen B, Schroll JB, Wetterslev J et al Sulfonylurea versus metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials and trial sequential analysis. CMAJ Open 2014; 2: E162-E175
  • 8 Claesen M, Gillard P, De SF et al Mortality in individuals treated with glucose-lowering agents: a large, controlled cohort study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101: 461-469
  • 9 Currie CJ, Poole CD, Evans M et al Mortality and other important diabetes-related outcomes with insulin vs other antihyperglycemic therapies in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 98: 668-677
  • 10 Stoekenbroek RM, Rensing KL, Bernelot Moens SJ et al High daily insulin exposure in patients with type 2 diabetes is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events. Atherosclerosis 2015; 240: 318-323
  • 11 Gerstein HC, Bosch J, Dagenais GR et al Basal insulin and cardiovascular and other outcomes in dysglycemia. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 319-328
  • 12 Dormandy JA, Charbonnel B, Eckland DJ et al Secondary prevention of macrovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes in the PROactive Study (PROspective pioglitAzone Clinical Trial In macroVascular Events): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 1279-1289
  • 13 Kernan WN, Viscoli CM, Furie KL et al Pioglitazone after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 1321-1331
  • 14 White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR et al Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1327-1335
  • 15 Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E et al Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1317-1326
  • 16 Green JB, Bethel MA, Armstrong PW et al Effect of sitagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 232-242
  • 17 Pfeffer MA, Claggett B, Diaz R et al Lixisenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes and acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2247-2257
  • 18 Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM et al Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015; 373: 2117-2128
  • 19 Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM et al Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 323-334
  • 20 Marso SP, Daniels GH, Brown-Frandsen K et al Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 311-322