Download PDF
Semin Hear 2022; 43(02): 079-084
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1748873
Review Article

Assistive Technology for Adults with Hearing Aids

Samuel R. Atcherson
1   Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
2   Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Although there is a strong trend of satisfaction with hearing aids, recent consumer surveys indicate that there are still challenges with understanding speech in background noise and low penetration of wireless technologies using many modern-day communication and audio devices, such as smartphones, tablets, and computers. For some listening and communication settings, many patients could benefit from assistive technology that exceeds the capabilities of their hearing aids. When patients are not wearing their hearing aids, such as during sleep, concerns about environmental awareness and safety begin to arise. This article describes some current assistive technologies and accessories that facilitate accessibility to other devices and to satisfy the patient's listening and communication needs.

Keywords

assistive technology - hearing loss - quality of life - speech understanding in noise - practice management - standards


Publication History

Article published online:
26 July 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Laplante-Lévesque A, Hickson L, Worrall L. Rehabilitation of older adults with hearing impairment: a critical review. J Aging Health 2010; 22 (02) 143-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Lesner SA. Candidacy and management of assistive listening devices: special needs of the elderly. Int J Audiol 2003; 42 (Suppl. 02) S68-S76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mattys SL, Davis MH, Bradlow AR, Scott SK. Speech recognition in adverse conditions: a review. Lang Cogn Process 2012; 26: 953-978
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Laplante-Lévesque A, Jensen LD, Dawes P, Nielsen C. Optimal hearing aid use: focus groups with hearing aid clients and audiologists. Ear Hear 2013; 34 (02) 193-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Picou EM. MarkeTrak 10 (MT10) survey results demonstrate high satisfaction with and benefits from hearing aids. Semin Hear 2020; 41 (01) 21-36
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Abrams HB, Kihm J. An introduction to MarkeTrak IX: a new baseline for the hearing aid market. The Hearing Review.. 2015 . December 29, 2021.Accessed April 16, 2022 at: https://hearingreview.com/practice-building/marketing/introduction-marketrak-ix-new-baseline-hearing-aid-market
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bost TJM, Versfeld NJ, Goverts ST. Effect of audibility and suprathreshold deficits on speech recognition for listeners with unilateral hearing loss. Ear Hear 2019; 40 (04) 1025-1034
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Audiology Practice Standards Organization.. S2.1 Hearing Aid Fitting Standard for Adult & Geriatric Patients. 2021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kochkin S. MarkeTrak VIII: Consumer satisfaction with hearing aids in slowly increasing. Hearing J 2010; 63: 11-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Compton-Conley C. Perceived difficulty with face-to-face communication by adult DMHA users with mild to moderate SNHL. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Auditory Society, March 2011 Scottsdale, AZ:
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dillon H, James A, Ginis J. Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and its relationship to several other measures of benefit and satisfaction provided by hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1997; 8 (01) 27-43
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Thibodeau LM. Maximizing communication via hearing assistance technology: Plotting beyond the audiogram!. Hear J 2004; 57: 46-51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Atcherson SR, Franklin CA, Smith-Olinde L. Hearing Assistive and Access Technology. San Diego:: Plural Publishing;; 2015. : 1-295
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Atcherson SR. Hearing assistive and related technology. In: Galster JA, ed. Audiology Treatment. 3rd ed. New York:: Thieme Medical Publishers;; 2018: 317-334
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Warren SE, Childress T, Naegle OG. Hearing assistance technologies and auditory-verbal therapy. In: Estabrooks W, Morrison HM, MacIver-Lux K, eds. Auditory Verbal Therapy: Science, Research, and Practice. San Diego:: Plural Publishing;; 2020: 243-268
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Thibodeau LM. Advanced practices: assistive technology in the age of smartphones and tablets. In: Montano J, Spitzer JB, eds. Adult Audiologic Rehabilitation. 3rd ed. San Diego:: Plural Publishing;; 2021: 403-425
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Thibodeau LM. Between the listener and the talker: connectivity options. Semin Hear 2020; 41 (04) 247-253
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Putterman DB, Valente M. Difference between the default telecoil (t-coil) and programmed microphone frequency response in behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 2012; 23 (05) 366-378
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Atcherson SR. Incorporating wireless frequency-modulated technology into your practice. Semin Hear 2014; 35: 239-245
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar