Download PDF
Int J Angiol 2022; 31(03): 198-202
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1750328
Invited Article

The Pulmonary Embolism Response Team: Rationale, Operation, and Outcomes

James J. Glazier 
1   Department of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
2   Department of Cardiology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, Michigan
,
Skarlet Patiño-Velasquez
1   Department of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
,
Carlos Oviedo
1   Department of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The pulmonary embolism response team (PERT) is an institutionally based multidisciplinary team that is able to rapidly assess and provide treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Intrinsic to the team's structure is a formal mechanism to execute a full range of medical, endovascular, and surgical therapies. In addition, the PERT provides appropriate multidisciplinary follow-up of patients. In the 10 years since the PERT was first introduced, it has gained acceptance in many centers in the United States and around the world. These PERTs have joined together to form an international association, called the PERT Consortium. The mission of this consortium is to advance the diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of patients with PE. There is considerable evidence that the PERT model improves delivery and standardization of care of PE patients, particularly those patients with massive and submassive PE. However, it is not yet clear whether PERTs improve clinical outcomes. A large prospective database is currently being compiled by the PERT Consortium. Analysis of this database will likely further delineate the role of PERTs in the management of intermediate-to-high risk PE patients and, importantly, help determine in which PE patients PERT may improve clinical outcomes.

Keywords

pulmonary embolus - pulmonary embolism response team - multidisciplinary approach - rapid response team - interventional radiology - interventional cardiology


Publication History

Article published online:
25 August 2022

© 2022. International College of Angiology. This article is published by Thieme.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Di Nisio M, van Es N, Büller HR. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Lancet 2016; 388 (10063): 3060-3073
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 CDC. Data and statistics on venous thromboembolism. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published February 12, 2020. Accessed April 14, 2022 at: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/dvt/data.html
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Office of the Surgeon General (US), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US). The surgeon general's Call to Action to Prevent Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism. Published online 2008. Accessed April 14, 2022 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44178/
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI. et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2022 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2022; 145 (08) e153-e639
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Tapson VF, Weinberg AS. Treatment, prognosis, and follow-up of acute pulmonary embolism in adults. Mandel J, Hockberger RS, eds. UpToDate; 2022. Accessed April 16, 2022 at: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/treatment-prognosis-and-follow-up-of-acute-pulmonary-embolism-in-adults/print?search=pulmonary+embolism&source=search_result&selectedTitle=2~150&usage_type=default&display_rank=2
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Rivera-Lebron B, McDaniel M, Ahrar K. et al; PERT Consortium. Diagnosis, treatment and follow up of acute pulmonary embolism: consensus practice from the PERT consortium. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2019; 25: 1076029619853037
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Olin JW. RESPONSE: do pulmonary embolism response teams result in improved outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism?. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77 (13) 1695-1696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Konstantinides SV, Meyer G. The 2019 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J 2019; 40 (42) 3453-3455
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Jaff MR, McMurtry MS, Archer SL. et al; American Heart Association Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation, American Heart Association Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease, American Heart Association Council on Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology. Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011; 123 (16) 1788-1830
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J. et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest 2016; 149 (02) 315-352
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 El Saghir NS, Keating NL, Carlson RW, Khoury KE, Fallowfield L. Tumor boards: optimizing the structure and improving efficiency of multidisciplinary management of patients with cancer worldwide. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2014; 34: e461-e466
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Holmes Jr DR, Rich JB, Zoghbi WA, Mack MJ. The heart team of cardiovascular care. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61 (09) 903-907
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jones DA, DeVita MA, Bellomo R. Rapid-response teams. N Engl J Med 2011; 365 (02) 139-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 What is PERT and How Can it Help Triage the PE Patient? Mass General Advances in Motion. Published August 17, 2017 Accessed April 14, 2022 at: https://advances.massgeneral.org/cardiovascular/video.aspx?id=1002
  • 15 The PERT Consortium® – the pulmonary embolism response team consortium – developing effective solutions to a devastating illness. Accessed April 15, 2022 at: https://pertconsortium.org/
  • 16 Barnes G, Giri J, Courtney DM. et al; National PERT™ Consortium Research Committee. Nuts and bolts of running a pulmonary embolism response team: results from an organizational survey of the National PERT™ Consortium members. Hosp Pract (1995) 2017; 45 (03) 76-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rosovsky R, Zhao K, Sista A, Rivera-Lebron B, Kabrhel C. Pulmonary embolism response teams: purpose, evidence for efficacy, and future research directions. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2019; 3 (03) 315-330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Saif K, Kevane B, Ní Áinle F, Rosovsky RP. The role of the PERT team in 2021. Thrombosis Update 2022;6:100092. Accessed April 15, 2022 at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666572721000614
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Brailovsky Y, Lakhter V. Pulmonary embolism response team: additional call burden or a valuable learning opportunity?. J Am Coll Cardiol 2021; 77 (13) 1691-1696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bilazarian S. “Pulmonary-Embolism Response Team: not just for the big boys.” Medscape; 2015. Accessed April 15, 2022 at: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/846071
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Chaudhury P, Gadre SK, Schneider E. et al. Impact of multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team availability on management and outcomes. Am J Cardiol 2019; 124 (09) 1465-1469
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rosovsky R, Chang Y, Rosenfield K. et al. Changes in treatment and outcomes after creation of a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT), a 10-year analysis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2019; 47 (01) 31-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Carroll BJ, Beyer SE, Mehegan T. et al. Changes in care for acute pulmonary embolism through a multidisciplinary pulmonary embolism response team. Am J Med 2020; 133 (11) 1313-1321.e6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Lookstein RA, Secemsky RA, Giri J. Pert Consortium. Paper presented at: 6th Annual Scientific Symposium; Virtual Global Online; October 23–24, 2020
    Google Scholar