Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39(03): 187-194
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1751274
Original Article

Postoperative Tachycardia in Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Breast Reconstruction: Is It a Reason to Worry?

Jaime L. Bernstein
1   Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
2   Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
,
Hao Huang
1   Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
,
David M. Otterburn
1   Department of Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Many patients who undergo free flap breast reconstruction develop postoperative hemodynamic changes, most noticeably, tachycardia. As there is currently no consensus on whether this tachycardia leads to clinically significant morbidity, it can trigger physician alarm and lead to extensive work-up. In this study, we aim to evaluate the predictors, evaluation, and outcomes associated with postoperative tachycardia in deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap patients.

Methods A retrospective review of DIEP flap patients between 2011 and 2020 was performed. Variables examined included demographics, preoperative laboratories and heart rate (HR), and intraoperative factors. Work-up of postoperative tachycardia and adverse postoperative events was noted. Tachycardia was defined as persistent HR of 100 beats/min or more for at least 12 consecutive hours following surgery. Tachycardic patients were compared with non-tachycardic patients using regression analysis.

Results In total, 249 patients (439 flaps) were included in this study. Sixty-one patients (24.9%) developed tachycardia postoperatively. Regression analysis revealed that preoperative HR (p = 0.002) and flap weight (p = 0.037) predicted the development of tachycardia. While tachycardic patients were significantly more likely to undergo additional imaging and specialty consultations (p <0.05), they were not at higher risk for most postoperative complications, with the exception of delayed abdominal donor-site healing.

Conclusion A significant number of DIEP flap patients can be expected to develop persistent tachycardia postoperatively. Isolated tachycardia should be considered a relatively benign finding that does not warrant extensive work-up or prolonged inpatient monitoring. Having the ability to predict tachycardia using preoperative HR and flap weight arms plastic surgeons with the confidence to limit costly work-up.

Keywords

deep inferior epigastric perforator - breast reconstruction - tachycardia - predictors - evaluation - outcomes


Publication History

Received: 20 December 2021

Accepted: 22 May 2022

Article published online:
11 August 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Fischer JP, Nelson JA, Mirzabeigi MN, Serletti JM, Kanchwala S. Perioperative hemodynamics in free flap breast reconstruction: incidence, predictors, and management of tachycardia. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 69 (04) 356-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Watterson LM, Morris RW, Williamson JA, Westhorpe RN. Crisis management during anaesthesia: tachycardia. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14 (03) e10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sachanandani NS, Kale SS, Skolnick GB, Barbour JR, Myckatyn TM. Tachycardia in breast reconstructive microsurgery: affirmation of the IMA tachycardia syndrome. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2015; 68 (06) 787-791
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gupta R, Gan TJ. Peri-operative fluid management to enhance recovery. Anaesthesia 2016; 71 (Suppl. 01) 40-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Neinstein RM, Hofer SO, Zhong T. et al. Fluid considerations to minimize early postoperative complications in free flap breast cancer reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Karamanos E, Walker R, Wang HT, Shah AR. Perioperative fluid resuscitation in free flap breast reconstruction: when is enough?. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (03) e2662
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Booi DI. Perioperative fluid overload increases anastomosis thrombosis in the free TRAM flap used for breast reconstruction. Eur J Plast Surg 2011; 34 (02) 81-86
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mathew JP, Parks R, Savino JS. et al. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: predictors, outcomes, and resource utilization. MultiCenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. JAMA 1996; 276 (04) 300-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Amar D. Perioperative atrial tachyarrhythmias. Anesthesiology 2002; 97 (06) 1618-1623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Doughty DB. Preventing and managing surgical wound dehiscence. Adv Skin Wound Care 2005; 18 (06) 319-322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 New Choice Health. Electrocardiogram cost and procedure information. Accessed September 23, 2020 at: www.newchoicehealth.com
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 American Hospital Association. 2018 AHA annual survey. Accessed September 23, 2020 at: www.ams.aha.org
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Haddock NT, Garza R, Boyle CE, Teotia SS. Observations from implementation of the ERAS protocol after DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (06) 506-510
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Rodnoi P, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. Economic impact of refinements in ERAS pathways in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (07) 524-529
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bamba R, Wiebe JE, Ingersol CA. et al. Do patient expectations of discharge affect length of stay after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (01) 34-40
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Fadavi D, Haley A, Khavanin N. et al. Postoperative free flap breast protocol optimizing resources and patient safety. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (05) 379-385
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Krebs EE, Carey TS, Weinberger M. Accuracy of the pain numeric rating scale as a screening test in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22 (10) 1453-1458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar