Drug Res (Stuttg) 2018; 68(06): 311-316
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-122490
Review
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Recent Progresses in Breast Reconstruction: Stem Cells, Biomaterials, and Growth Factors

Farshad Zarei
1   Department of Surgery, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
,
Hadis Daraee
2   Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Tehran University of Medical sciences, Tehran, Iran
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 13 August 2017

accepted 07 October 2017

Publication Date:
04 December 2017 (online)

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most deadly tumors in women, and new procedures for post- surgical breast reconstruction have been developed which includes autologous stromal vascular fraction (SVF), platelet-derived growth factors, biomaterials and various stem cells. Adipose derived-stem cells (ASCs) has been reported to be one of the most widely used stem cell for breast reconstruction because of their ability to form new functional adipose tissue and vessels and in combination with stromal vascular fraction has been also reported efficient for breast reconstruction. Biomaterials include acellular dermal matrix, bone substitutes, and injectable have also been reported to be applicable for several clinical applications, including breast reconstruction surgery. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to explicitly define methodological procedures and to confirm the safety of all theses procedures during post-surgical breast reconstruction. The purpose of this mini-review is to summarize various recent and old applications of stem cells, biomaterials as well as growth factors in breast reconstruction.

 
  • References

  • 1 Jaferian S, Soleymaninejad M, Negahdari B. et al. Stem cell, biomaterials and growth factors therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomed Pharmacother 2017; 88: 1046-1053
  • 2 Beiranvand S, Karimi A. Effect of Encapsulated Artemisia aucheri. L magnetic nanogel extract on shoulder block in rat. Drug Res. (Stuttg) 2017
  • 3 Daghighi S, Sjollema J, van der Mei HC. et al. Infection resistance of degradable versus non-degradable biomaterials: An assessment of the potential mechanisms. Biomaterials 2013; 34: 8013-8017
  • 4 Kim JJ, Evans GRD. Applications of Biomaterials in Plastic Surgery. Clin Plast Surg 2012; 39: 359-376
  • 5 Widgerow AD. Bioengineered matrices--part 1: Attaining structural success in biologic skin substitutes. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68: 568-573
  • 6 Widgerow AD. Bioengineered matrices--part 2: focal adhesion, integrins, and the fibroblast effect. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68: 574-578
  • 7 Banyard DA, Bourgeois JM, Widgerow AD. et al. Regenerative biomaterials. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135: 1740-1748
  • 8 Banyard DA, Bourgeois JM, Widgerow AD. et al. Regenerative biomaterials: A review. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135: 1740-1748
  • 9 Namdari M, Cheraghi M, Negahdari B. et al. Recent advances in magnetoliposome for heart drug delivery. Artif Cells, Nanomedicine, Biotechnol 2017; 1-7
  • 10 Salzberg CA, Ashikari AY, Koch RM. et al. An 8-year experience of direct-to-implant immediate breast reconstruction using human acellular dermal matrix (AlloDerm). Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 514-524
  • 11 Hester Jr. TR, Ghazi BH, Moyer HR. et al. Use of dermal matrix to prevent capsular contracture in aesthetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130: 126S-136SS
  • 12 Spear SL, Sher SR, Al-Attar A. et al. Applications of acellular dermal matrix in revision breast reconstruction surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 133: 1-10
  • 13 Garcia Jr. O, Scott JR. Analysis of acellular dermal matrix integration and revascularization following tissue expander breast reconstruction in a clinically relevant large-animal model. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131: 741e-751ee
  • 14 Basu CB, Leong M, Hicks MJ. Acellular cadaveric dermis decreases the inflammatory response in capsule formation in reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 1842-1847
  • 15 Sbitany H, Serletti JM. Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128: 1162-1169
  • 16 Kim JYS, Davila Aa, Persing S. et al. Meta-analysis of human acellular dermis and submuscular tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 129: 28-41
  • 17 Namdari M, Eatemadi A, Soleimaninejad M. et al. A brief review on the application of nanoparticle enclosed herbal medicine for the treatment of infective endocarditis. Biomed Pharmacother 2017; 87: 321-331
  • 18 Cayci C, Santner F, Jacobson SR. Impact and outcome of human acellular dermal matrix size for immediate and two-stage breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132: 11-18
  • 19 Dieterich M, Dieterich H. TS et al Using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP® Bra) for implant-based breast reconstruction: case report and histological analysis. Arch Gynecol Obs 2012; 286: 273-276
  • 20 Dieterich M, Paepke S, Zwiefel K. et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh (TiLOOP Bra): a multicenter study of 231 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132: 8e-19e
  • 21 Dieterich M, Faridi A. Biological matrices and synthetic meshes used in implant-based breast reconstruction – A review of products available in Germany. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2013; 73: 1100-1106
  • 22 Hjort H, Mathisen T, Alves A. et al. Three-year results from a preclinical implantation study of a long-term resorbable surgical mesh with time-dependent mechanical characteristics. Hernia 2012; 16: 191-197
  • 23 Becker H, Lind JG. The use of synthetic mesh in reconstructive, revision, and cosmetic breast surgery. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2013; 37: 914-921
  • 24 Ibrahim AMS, Ayeni Oa, Hughes KB. et al. Acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery: a comprehensive review. Ann Plast Surg 2013; 70: 732-738
  • 25 Spear SL, Sinkin JC, Al-Attar A. Porcine acellular dermal matrix (strattice) in primary and revision cosmetic breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131: 1140-1148
  • 26 Mulier KE, Nguyen AH, Delaney JP. et al. Comparison of PermacolTM and StratticeTM for the repair of abdominal wall defects. Hernia 2011; 15: 315-319
  • 27 Namdari M, Eatemadi A. Cardioprotective effects of curcumin-loaded magnetic hydrogel nanocomposite (nanocurcumin) against doxorubicin-induced cardiac toxicity in rat cardiomyocyte cell lines. Artif cells, nanomedicine, Biotechnol 2017; 45: 731-739
  • 28 Losken A. Early results using sterilized acellular human dermis (Neoform) in post-mastectomy tissue expander breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 1654-1658
  • 29 Cheraghi M, Namdari M, Daraee H. et al. Cardioprotective effect of magnetic hydrogel nanocomposite loaded N, α-L-rhamnopyranosyl vincosamide isolated from Moringa oleifera leaves against doxorubicin-induced cardiac toxicity in rats: In vitro and in vivo studies. J Microencapsul 2017; 1-25
  • 30 Hwang K, Hwang JH, Park JH. et al. Experimental study of autologous cartilage, acellular cadaveric dermis, lyophilized bovine pericardium, and irradiated bovine tendon: applicability to nasal tip plasty. J Craniofac Surg 2007; 18: 551-558
  • 31 Butterfield JL. 440 Consecutive immediate, implant-based, single-surgeon breast reconstructions in 281 patients: a comparison of early outcomes and costs between SurgiMend fetal bovine and AlloDerm human cadaveric acellular dermal matrices. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 131: 940-951
  • 32 Orenstein S, Qiao Y, Kaur M. et al. In vitro activation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells induced by human biologic meshes. J Surg Res 2010; 158: 10-14
  • 33 Liu DZ, Mathes DW, Neligan PC. et al. Comparison of outcomes using AlloDerm versus FlexHD for implant-based breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2014; 72: 503-507
  • 34 Becker S, Saint-Cyr M, Wong C. et al. AlloDerm versus DermaMatrix in immediate expander-based breast reconstruction: a preliminary comparison of complication profiles and material compliance. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 123: 1-6-108
  • 35 Zarei F, Negahdari B, Eatemadi A. Diabetic ulcer regeneration: stem cells, biomaterials, growth factors. Artif Cells, Nanomedicine, Biotechnol 2017; 1-7
  • 36 Namdari M, Negahdari B, Cheraghi M. et al. Cardiac failure detection in 30 minutes: new approach based on gold nanoparticles. J Microencapsul 2017; 1-7
  • 37 Sterodimas A, de Faria J, Nicaretta B. et al. Tissue engineering with adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs): Current and future applications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 2010; 63: 1886-1892
  • 38 Bielli A, Scioli MG, Gentile P. et al. Adipose tissue-derived stem cell therapy for post-surgical breast reconstruction--more light than shadows. Adv Clin Exp Med 2015; 24: 545-548
  • 39 Masuda T, Furue M, Matsuda T. Novel strategy for soft tissue augmentation based on transplantation of fragmented omentum and preadipocytes. Tissue Eng 2004; 10: 1672-1683
  • 40 Zarei F, Negahdari B. Recent progresses in plastic surgery using adipose-derived stem cells, biomaterials and growth factors. J Microencapsul 2017; 1-25
  • 41 Matsumoto D, Sato K, Gonda K. et al Cell-assisted lipotransfer: supportive use of human adipose-derived cells for soft tissue augmentation with lipoinjection. Tissue Eng 2006; 12: 3375-3382
  • 42 Moseley Ta, Zhu M, Hedrick MH. Adipose-derived stem and progenitor cells as fillers in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118: 121S-128S
  • 43 Zhu M, Zhou Z, Chen Y. et al. Supplementation of fat grafts with adipose-derived regenerative cells improves long-term graft retention. Ann Plast Surg 2010; 64: 222-228
  • 44 Rasmussen JG, Frøbert O, Pilgaard L. et al. Prolonged hypoxic culture and trypsinization increase the pro-angiogenic potential of human adipose tissue-derived stem cells. Cytotherapy 2011; 13: 318-328
  • 45 Rubina K, Kalinina N, Efimenko A. et al. Adipose Stromal Cells Stimulate Angiogenesis via Promoting Progenitor Cell Differentiation, Secretion of Angiogenic Factors, and Enhancing Vessel Maturation. Tissue Eng Part A 2009; 15: 2039-2050
  • 46 Coleman SR, Saboeiro AP. Fat grafting to the breast revisited: safety and efficacy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 775-785-787
  • 47 Yoshimura K, Sato K, Aoi N. et al. Cell-assisted lipotransfer for cosmetic breast augmentation: Supportive use of adipose-derived stem/stromal cells. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008; 32: 48-55
  • 48 Yoshimura K, Asano Y, Aoi N. et al Progenitor-enriched adipose tissue transplantation as rescue for breast implant complications. Breast J 2010; 16: 169-175
  • 49 Kitamura K, Kajitani K, Hedrick MSK. Stem cell augmented reconstruction: a new hope for reconstruction after breast conservation therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 106: 2007, Abstract 4071
  • 50 Tissiani LAL, Alonso N. A prospective and controlled clinical trial on stromal vascular fraction enriched fat grafts in secondary breast reconstruction. Stem Cells Int 2016; DOI: 10.1155/2016/2636454.
  • 51 Hassanzadeh-kiabi F, Negahdari B. Antinociceptive synergistic interaction between Achillea millefolium and Origanum vulgare L. extract encapsulated in liposome in rat. Artif Cells, Nanomedicine, Biotechnol 2017; 1-7
  • 52 Claro F, Figueiredo JCA, Zampar AG. et al. Applicability and safety of autologous fat for reconstruction of the breast. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 768-780