Common Sounds Audiograms: Quantitative Analyses and Recommendations

Abstract

A counseling tool routinely used by pediatric audiologists and early intervention-specialists is the often-named “common sounds audiogram” (CSA). Typically, a child's hearing detection thresholds are plotted on the CSA to indicate that child's audibility of speech and environmental sounds. Importantly, the CSA may be the first item that parents see when their child's hearing loss is explained. Thus, the accuracy of the CSA and its associated counseling information are integral to the parents' understanding of what their child can hear and to the parents' role in the child's future hearing care and interventions. Currently available CSAs were collected from professional societies, early intervention providers, device manufacturers, etc., and analyzed (n = 36). Analysis included quantification of sound elements, presence of counseling information, attribution of acoustic measurements, and errors. The analyses show that currently-available CSAs are wildly inconsistent as a group, not scientifically justified, and omit important information for counseling and interpretation. Variations found among currently available CSAs can lead to very different parental interpretations of the impact of a child's hearing loss on his/her access to sounds, especially spoken language. Such variations, presumably, could also lead to different recommendations regarding intervention and hearing devices. Recommendations are outlined for the development of a new, standard CSA.

Keywords

counseling - hearing loss - pediatric - familiar sounds audiogram - speech banana

Publication History

Article published online:
22 March 2023

• References

• 1 Resciniti JL. My magic ear kid. Hear Health 2018; 34 (03) 6-9
• 2 American Academy of Audiology. Product Details: Audiogram of Familiar Sounds. Audiology.org. 2014. Accessed April 11, 2019 at: https://memberportal.audiology.org/Shop/Product-Details?productid={A09B06C1-B6BB-4138-A8F7-6BD9B75FCBBE}
• 3 Central Institute for the Deaf. Familiar Sounds Audiogram. No date. Accessed March 27, 2019 at: https://cid.edu/professionals/free-resources/fr-auditory-development-resources-11-17/
• 4 Ricketts TA, Bentler R, Mueller HG. Essentials of Modern Hearing Aids: Selection, Fitting, and Verification. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2019
• 5 Pittman AL, Stelmachowicz PG, Lewis DE, Hoover BM. Spectral characteristics of speech at the ear: implications for amplification in children. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2003; 46 (03) 649-657
• 6 Ling D, Ling AH. Aural Habilitation: The Foundations of Verbal Learning in Hearing-Impaired Children. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf; 1978
• 7 Ling D. Foundations of Spoken Language for Hearing Impaired Children. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf; 1989
• 8 Pearsons KS, Bennett RL, Fidell S. Speech Levels in Various Noise Environments (Report No. EPA-600/1–77–025). Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; 1977
• 9 Pascoe DP. Clinical implications of nonverbal methods of hearing aid selection and fitting. Sem Speech Lang Hear 1980; 1 (03) 217-228
• 10 Northern JL, Downs MP. Hearing in Children. 1st ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins Company; 1974
• 11 Northern JL, Downs MP. Hearing in Children. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins Company; 1978
• 12 Northern JL, Downs MP. Hearing in Children. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins Company; 1984
• 13 Northern JL, Downs MP. Hearing in Children. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins Company; 1991
• 14 Northern JL, Downs MP. Hearing in Children. 5th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002
• 15 Northern JL, Downs MP. Hearing in Children. 6th ed. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing; 2014
• 16 Skinner MW. The hearing of speech during language acquisition. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1978; 11 (03) 631-650
• 17 Dudich TM, Keiser M, Keither RW. Some relationships between loudness and the acoustic reflex. Impedance Newsletter 1975; 4: 12-15
• 18 Olsen W. Speech spectrum, audiograms and functional gain. Hear J 1984; 37 (08) 25
• 19 Chial MR. Yet another audiogram. ASHA Perspect Hear Hear Disord: Res Diagn 1998; 2 (01) 2-3
• 20 Fant G. Acoustic Analysis and Synthesis of Speech with Applications to Swedish. Stockholm: Ericsson Technics; 1959
• 21 Pascoe DP. Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on the speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1975; 84 (5, Pt 2; Suppl 23): 1-40
• 22 Dunn HK, White SD. Statistical measurements on conversational speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1940; 11 (03) 278-288
• 23 Pascoe D. An Approach to Hearing Aid Selection. Hearing Instruments 1978. 29. 12-17
• 24 Holube I, Fredelake S, Vlaming M, Kollmeier B. Development and analysis of an International Speech Test Signal (ISTS). Int J Audiol 2010; 49 (12) 891-903
• 25 Olsen WO. Average speech levels and spectra in various speaking/listening conditions: a summary of the Pearson, Bennett, & Fidell (1977) report. Am J Audiol 1998; 7 (02) 21-25
• 26 Byrne D, Dillon H, Tran K. et al. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96 (04) 2108-2120
• 27 Cox RM, Matesich JS, Moore JN. Distribution of short-term RMS levels in conversational speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 84 (03) 1100-1104
• 28 Hillenbrand J, Getty LA, Clark MJ, Wheeler K. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97 (5, Pt 1): 3099-3111
• 29 Jongman A, Wayland R, Wong S. Acoustic characteristics of English fricatives. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108 (3, Pt 1): 1252-1263
• 30 Scollie S, Glista D, Tenhaaf J. et al. Stimuli and normative data for detection of Ling-6 sounds in hearing level. Am J Audiol 2012; 21 (02) 232-241