Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2023; 36(06): 430-440
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1767710
Review Article

Organ Preservation in MSS Rectal Cancer

Yuye Gao
1   Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Unit III, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
,
Aiwen Wu
1   Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Unit III, Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Rectal cancer is a heterogeneous disease with complex genetic and molecular subtypes. Emerging progress of neoadjuvant therapy has led to increased pathological and clinical complete response (cCR) rates for microsatellite stable (MSS) rectal cancer, which responds poorly to immune checkpoint inhibitor alone. As a result, organ preservation of MSS rectal cancer as an alternative to radical surgery has gradually become a feasible option. For patients with cCR or near-cCR after neoadjuvant treatment, organ preservation can be implemented safely with less morbidity. Patient selection can be done either before the neoadjuvant treatment for higher probability or after with careful assessment for a favorable outcome. Those patients who achieved a good clinical response are managed with nonoperative management, organ preservation surgery, or radiation therapy alone followed by strict surveillance. The oncological outcomes of patients with careful selection and organ preservation seem to be noninferior compared with those of radical surgery, with lower postoperative morbidity. However, more studies should be done to seek better regression of tumor and maximize the possibility of organ preservation in MSS rectal cancer.



Publication History

Article published online:
16 April 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72 (01) 7-33
  • 2 Weng J, Li S, Zhu Z. et al. Exploring immunotherapy in colorectal cancer. J Hematol Oncol 2022; 15 (01) 95
  • 3 Ciardiello D, Vitiello PP, Cardone C. et al. Immunotherapy of colorectal cancer: challenges for therapeutic efficacy. Cancer Treat Rev 2019; 76: 22-32
  • 4 Cercek A, Lumish M, Sinopoli J. et al. PD-1 blockade in mismatch repair-deficient, locally advanced rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2022; 386 (25) 2363-2376
  • 5 Habr-Gama A, Gama-Rodrigues J, São Julião GP. et al. Local recurrence after complete clinical response and watch and wait in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: impact of salvage therapy on local disease control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2014; 88 (04) 822-828
  • 6 Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W. et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (04) 711-717 , discussion 717–718
  • 7 Maas M, Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ. et al. Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29 (35) 4633-4640
  • 8 Martens MH, Maas M, Heijnen LA. et al. Long-term outcome of an organ preservation program after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2016; 108 (12) djw171
  • 9 Renehan AG, Malcomson L, Emsley R. et al. Watch-and-wait approach versus surgical resection after chemoradiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer (the OnCoRe project): a propensity-score matched cohort analysis. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17 (02) 174-183
  • 10 Smith JD, Ruby JA, Goodman KA. et al. Nonoperative management of rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Surg 2012; 256 (06) 965-972
  • 11 Smith JJ, Strombom P, Chow OS. et al. Assessment of a watch-and-wait strategy for rectal cancer in patients with a complete response after neoadjuvant therapy. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5 (04) e185896
  • 12 Bujko K, Richter P, Smith FM. et al. Preoperative radiotherapy and local excision of rectal cancer with immediate radical re-operation for poor responders: a prospective multicentre study. Radiother Oncol 2013; 106 (02) 198-205
  • 13 Perez RO, Habr-Gama A, São Julião GP. et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) following neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer: outcomes of salvage resection for local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23 (04) 1143-1148
  • 14 Pucciarelli S, De Paoli A, Guerrieri M. et al. Local excision after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: results of a multicenter phase II clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (12) 1349-1356
  • 15 Rullier E, Rouanet P, Tuech J-J. et al. Organ preservation for rectal cancer (GRECCAR 2): a prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017; 390 (10093): 469-479
  • 16 Stijns RCH, de Graaf EJR, Punt CJA. et al; CARTS Study Group. Long-term oncological and functional outcomes of chemoradiotherapy followed by organ-sparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery for distal rectal cancer: the CARTS study. JAMA Surg 2019; 154 (01) 47-54
  • 17 Verseveld M, de Graaf EJR, Verhoef C. et al; CARTS Study Group. Chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer in the distal rectum followed by organ-sparing transanal endoscopic microsurgery (CARTS study). Br J Surg 2015; 102 (07) 853-860
  • 18 Ionov Y, Peinado MA, Malkhosyan S, Shibata D, Perucho M. Ubiquitous somatic mutations in simple repeated sequences reveal a new mechanism for colonic carcinogenesis. Nature 1993; 363 (6429): 558-561
  • 19 Benatti P, Gafà R, Barana D. et al. Microsatellite instability and colorectal cancer prognosis. Clin Cancer Res 2005; 11 (23) 8332-8340
  • 20 André T, Shiu K-K, Kim TW. et al; KEYNOTE-177 Investigators. Pembrolizumab in microsatellite-instability-high advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2020; 383 (23) 2207-2218
  • 21 Cancer Genome Atlas Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 2012; 487 (7407): 330-337
  • 22 Maby P, Tougeron D, Hamieh M. et al. Correlation between density of CD8+ T-cell infiltrate in microsatellite unstable colorectal cancers and frameshift mutations: a rationale for personalized immunotherapy. Cancer Res 2015; 75 (17) 3446-3455
  • 23 Alexander J, Watanabe T, Wu TT, Rashid A, Li S, Hamilton SR. Histopathological identification of colon cancer with microsatellite instability. Am J Pathol 2001; 158 (02) 527-535
  • 24 Stadler ZK, Battaglin F, Middha S. et al. Reliable detection of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancers using mutational load in next-generation sequencing panels. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34 (18) 2141-2147
  • 25 Marisa L, Svrcek M, Collura A. et al. The balance between cytotoxic T-cell lymphocytes and immune checkpoint expression in the prognosis of colon tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018; 110 (01) 68-77
  • 26 Sha D, Jin Z, Budczies J, Kluck K, Stenzinger A, Sinicrope FA. Tumor mutational burden as a predictive biomarker in solid tumors. Cancer Discov 2020; 10 (12) 1808-1825
  • 27 Sinicrope FA, Shi Q, Smyrk TC. et al. Molecular markers identify subtypes of stage III colon cancer associated with patient outcomes. Gastroenterology 2015; 148 (01) 88-99
  • 28 Zhu M, Cui H, Zhang L, Zhao K, Jia X, Jin H. Assessment of POLE and POLD1 mutations as prognosis and immunotherapy biomarkers for stomach adenocarcinoma. Transl Cancer Res 2022; 11 (01) 193-205
  • 29 Domingo E, Freeman-Mills L, Rayner E. et al; Epicolon consortium. Somatic POLE proofreading domain mutation, immune response, and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a retrospective, pooled biomarker study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 1 (03) 207-216
  • 30 Versluis JM, Long GV, Blank CU. Learning from clinical trials of neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade. Nat Med 2020; 26 (04) 475-484
  • 31 Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W. et al; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351 (17) 1731-1740
  • 32 National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Colon Cancer (version 2.2022); 2022. Accessed March 7, 2023 at: https://www.nccn.org/
  • 33 van de Velde CJH, Boelens PG, Borras JM. et al. EURECCA colorectal: multidisciplinary management: European consensus conference colon & rectum. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50 (01) 1.e1-1.e34
  • 34 van Oostendorp SE, Smits LJH, Vroom Y. et al. Local recurrence after local excision of early rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of completion TME, adjuvant (chemo)radiation, or no additional treatment. Br J Surg 2020; 107 (13) 1719-1730
  • 35 Halverson AL, Morris AM, Cleary RK, Chang GJ. For patients with early rectal cancer, does local excision have an impact on recurrence, survival, and quality of life relative to radical resection?. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26 (08) 2497-2506
  • 36 Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E. et al; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2018; 29 (Suppl. 04) iv263
  • 37 Minsky B. Adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. ASCO Annual Meeting Educational Book. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 472-477
  • 38 Kong JC, Soucisse M, Michael M. et al. Total neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and metaanalysis of oncological and operative outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28 (12) 7476-7486
  • 39 Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR, Dixon E, Buie WD. Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2010; 251 (05) 807-818
  • 40 Wiltink LM, Marijnen CAM, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, van de Velde CJH, Nout RA. A comprehensive longitudinal overview of health-related quality of life and symptoms after treatment for rectal cancer in the TME trial. Acta Oncol 2016; 55 (04) 502-508
  • 41 Lange MM, van de Velde CJH. Urinary and sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment. Nat Rev Urol 2011; 8 (01) 51-57
  • 42 Bossema E, Stiggelbout A, Baas-Thijssen M, van de Velde C, Marijnen C. Patients' preferences for low rectal cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2008; 34 (01) 42-48
  • 43 Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Fung C. et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality following resection of the colon and rectum for cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38 (05) 480-486 , discussion 486–487
  • 44 Farouk R, Duthie GS, Lee PW, Monson JR. Endosonographic evidence of injury to the internal anal sphincter after low anterior resection: long-term follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41 (07) 888-891
  • 45 Abbas MA. Sphincter preservation for distal rectal cancer: how low is too low?. Am J Clin Oncol 2008; 31 (02) 195-198
  • 46 Grumann MM, Noack EM, Hoffmann IA, Schlag PM. Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2001; 233 (02) 149-156
  • 47 Appelt AL, Pløen J, Vogelius IR, Bentzen SM, Jakobsen A. Radiation dose-response model for locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 85 (01) 74-80
  • 48 Appelt AL, Pløen J, Harling H. et al. High-dose chemoradiotherapy and watchful waiting for distal rectal cancer: a prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16 (08) 919-927
  • 49 Frin AC, Evesque L, Gal J. et al. Organ or sphincter preservation for rectal cancer. The role of contact X-ray brachytherapy in a monocentric series of 112 patients. Eur J Cancer 2017; 72: 124-136
  • 50 Gérard JP, Barbet N, Gal J. et al. Planned organ preservation for early T2-3 rectal adenocarcinoma: a French, multicentre study. Eur J Cancer 2019; 108: 1-16
  • 51 Gerard JP, Frin AC, Doyen J. et al. Organ preservation in rectal adenocarcinoma (T1) T2-T3 Nx M0. Historical overview of the Lyon Sud - nice experience using contact x-ray brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy for 120 patients. Acta Oncol 2015; 54 (04) 545-551
  • 52 Sun Myint A, Smith FM, Gollins S. et al. Dose escalation using contact X-ray brachytherapy after external beam radiotherapy as nonsurgical treatment option for rectal cancer: outcomes from a single-center experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100 (03) 565-573
  • 53 Sun Myint A, Smith FM, Gollins SW. et al. Dose escalation using contact X-ray brachytherapy (Papillon) for rectal cancer: does it improve the chance of organ preservation?. Br J Radiol 2017; 90 (1080): 20170175
  • 54 Rijkmans EC, Cats A, Nout RA. et al. Endorectal brachytherapy boost after external beam radiation therapy in elderly or medically inoperable patients with rectal cancer: primary outcomes of the phase 1 HERBERT study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98 (04) 908-917
  • 55 Habr-Gama A, Sabbaga J, Gama-Rodrigues J. et al. Watch and wait approach following extended neoadjuvant chemoradiation for distal rectal cancer: are we getting closer to anal cancer management?. Dis Colon Rectum 2013; 56 (10) 1109-1117
  • 56 Ortholan C, Romestaing P, Chapet O, Gerard JP. Correlation in rectal cancer between clinical tumor response after neoadjuvant radiotherapy and sphincter or organ preservation: 10-year results of the Lyon R 96-02 randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 83 (02) e165-e171
  • 57 Ribic CM, Sargent DJ, Moore MJ. et al. Tumor microsatellite-instability status as a predictor of benefit from fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (03) 247-257
  • 58 Manatakis DK, Gouvas N, Souglakos J, Xynos E. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy alone for the locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review. Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 25 (09) 1570-1580
  • 59 Deng Y, Chi P, Lan P. et al. Neoadjuvant modified FOLFOX6 with or without radiation versus fluorouracil plus radiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: final results of the Chinese FOWARC trial. J Clin Oncol 2019; 37 (34) 3223-3233
  • 60 Mei W-J, Wang X-Z, Li Y-F. et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with CAPOX versus Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer with Uninvolved Mesorectal Fascia (CONVERT): initial results of a phase III trial. Ann Surg 2022; Online ahead of print
  • 61 Zhang J, Li J, Huang M. et al. Neoadjuvant mfolfoxiri with selective radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term outcomes of phase II study and propensity-score matched comparison with chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; Online ahead of print
  • 62 Ding M, Zhang J, Hu H. et al. mFOLFOXIRI versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21 (01) e12-e20
  • 63 Ye S-B, Cheng Y-K, Zhang L. et al. Association of mismatch repair status with survival and response to neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy in rectal cancer. NPJ Precis Oncol 2020; 4: 26
  • 64 Schrag D, Weiser M, Saltz L. et al. Challenges and solutions in the design and execution of the PROSPECT Phase II/III neoadjuvant rectal cancer trial (NCCTG N1048/Alliance). Clin Trials 2019; 16 (02) 165-175
  • 65 Ohue M, Iwasa S, Mizusawa J. et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing perioperative vs. postoperative mFOLFOX6 for lower rectal cancer with suspected lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis (JCOG1310): a phase II/III randomized controlled trial. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52 (08) 850-858
  • 66 Fukuoka S, Hara H, Takahashi N. et al. Regorafenib plus nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or colorectal cancer: an open-label, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion phase Ib trial (REGONIVO, EPOC1603). J Clin Oncol 2020; 38 (18) 2053-2061
  • 67 Garcia-Aguilar J, Renfro LA, Chow OS. et al. Organ preservation for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision (ACOSOG Z6041): results of an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16 (15) 1537-1546
  • 68 Garcia-Aguilar J, Chow OS, Smith DD. et al; Timing of Rectal Cancer Response to Chemoradiation Consortium. Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2015; 16 (08) 957-966
  • 69 Cercek A, Roxburgh CSD, Strombom P. et al. Adoption of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. JAMA Oncol 2018; 4 (06) e180071
  • 70 Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B. et al; RAPIDO collaborative investigators. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22 (01) 29-42
  • 71 Conroy T, Bosset J-F, Etienne P-L. et al; Unicancer Gastrointestinal Group and Partenariat de Recherche en Oncologie Digestive (PRODIGE) Group. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX and preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (UNICANCER-PRODIGE 23): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021; 22 (05) 702-715
  • 72 Jin J, Tang Y, Hu C. et al. Multicenter, randomized, phase III trial of short-term radiotherapy plus chemotherapy versus long-term chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (STELLAR). J Clin Oncol 2022; 40 (15) 1681-1692
  • 73 Garcia-Aguilar J, Patil S, Gollub MJ. et al. Organ preservation in patients with rectal adenocarcinoma treated with total neoadjuvant therapy. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40 (23) 2546-2556
  • 74 Wang L, Zhang X-Y, Zhao Y-M. et al; Rectal Cancer Cooperative Group of Peking University Cancer Hospital. Intentional watch & wait or organ preservation surgery following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus consolidation CAPEOX for MRI-defined low-risk rectal cancer: findings from a prospective phase 2 trial (PKUCH-R01 Trial, NCT02860234). Ann Surg 2022; Online ahead of print
  • 75 Kim JK, Marco MR, Roxburgh CSD. et al. Survival after induction chemotherapy and chemoradiation versus chemoradiation and adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Oncologist 2022; 27 (05) 380-388
  • 76 Rettig RL, Beard BW, Ryoo JJ. et al. Total neoadjuvant therapy significantly increases complete clinical response. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66 (03) 374-382
  • 77 Rahma OE, Yothers G, Hong TS. et al. Use of total neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results from the pembrolizumab arm of a phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7 (08) 1225-1230
  • 78 Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H. et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (26) 2509-2520
  • 79 Bando H, Tsukada Y, Inamori K. et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy plus nivolumab before surgery in patients with microsatellite stable and microsatellite instability-high locally advanced rectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28 (06) 1136-1146
  • 80 Chalabi M, Fanchi LF, Dijkstra KK. et al. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy leads to pathological responses in MMR-proficient and MMR-deficient early-stage colon cancers. Nat Med 2020; 26 (04) 566-576
  • 81 Lin Z, Cai M, Zhang P. et al. Phase II, single-arm trial of preoperative short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and camrelizumab in locally advanced rectal cancer. J Immunother Cancer 2021; 9 (11) e003554
  • 82 Theelen WSME, Peulen HMU, Lalezari F. et al. Effect of pembrolizumab after stereotactic body radiotherapy vs pembrolizumab alone on tumor response in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: results of the PEMBRO-RT phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 2019; 5 (09) 1276-1282
  • 83 El-Saghire H, Michaux A, Thierens H, Baatout S. Low doses of ionizing radiation induce immune-stimulatory responses in isolated human primary monocytes. Int J Mol Med 2013; 32 (06) 1407-1414
  • 84 Kepp O, Galluzzi L, Martins I. et al. Molecular determinants of immunogenic cell death elicited by anticancer chemotherapy. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2011; 30 (01) 61-69
  • 85 Li YJ, Zhang L, Dong QS. et al. Short-term outcome of programmed cell death protein1 (PD-1) antibody combined with total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced middle-low rectal cancer with high risk factors [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 2021; 24 (11) 998-1007
  • 86 Smith JJ, Chow OS, Gollub MJ. et al; Rectal Cancer Consortium. Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma: a phase II randomized controlled trial evaluating 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy, and total mesorectal excision or nonoperative management. BMC Cancer 2015; 15 (01) 767
  • 87 van der Valk MJM, Hilling DE, Bastiaannet E. et al; IWWD Consortium. Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study. Lancet 2018; 391 (10139): 2537-2545
  • 88 Hiotis SP, Weber SM, Cohen AM. et al. Assessing the predictive value of clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: an analysis of 488 patients. J Am Coll Surg 2002; 194 (02) 131-135 , discussion 135–136
  • 89 Garant A, Florianova L, Gologan A. et al. Do clinical criteria reflect pathologic complete response in rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy?. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33 (06) 727-733
  • 90 Nahas SC, Rizkallah Nahas CS, Sparapan Marques CF. et al. Pathologic complete response in rectal cancer: can we detect it? Lessons learned from a proposed randomized trial of watch-and-wait treatment of rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2016; 59 (04) 255-263
  • 91 Probst CP, Becerra AZ, Aquina CT. et al; Consortium for Optimizing the Surgical Treatment of Rectal Cancer (OSTRiCh). Extended intervals after neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: the key to improved tumor response and potential organ preservation. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 221 (02) 430-440
  • 92 Hupkens BJP, Maas M, Martens MH. et al. Organ preservation in rectal cancer after chemoradiation: should we extend the observation period in patients with a clinical near-complete response?. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25 (01) 197-203
  • 93 Lezoche E, Baldarelli M, Lezoche G, Paganini AM, Gesuita R, Guerrieri M. Randomized clinical trial of endoluminal locoregional resection versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for T2 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. Br J Surg 2012; 99 (09) 1211-1218
  • 94 Park IJ, You YN, Agarwal A. et al. Neoadjuvant treatment response as an early response indicator for patients with rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30 (15) 1770-1776
  • 95 Malesci A, Laghi L, Bianchi P. et al. Reduced likelihood of metastases in patients with microsatellite-unstable colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2007; 13 (13) 3831-3839
  • 96 Dossa F, Chesney TR, Acuna SA, Baxter NN. A watch-and-wait approach for locally advanced rectal cancer after a clinical complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 2 (07) 501-513
  • 97 Beets GL. What are we going to do with complete responses after chemoradiation of rectal cancer?. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 23 (06) 1801-1802
  • 98 Vatandoust S, Wattchow D, Sposato L. et al. A longitudinal cohort study of watch and wait in complete clinical responders after chemo-radiotherapy for localised rectal cancer: study protocol. BMC Cancer 2022; 22 (01) 222
  • 99 Bibi S, Edilbe MW, Rao C. The cost-effectiveness of watch and wait for rectal cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35 (02) 132-137
  • 100 Miller AR, Cantor SB, Peoples GE, Pearlstone DB, Skibber JM. Quality of life and cost effectiveness analysis of therapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43 (12) 1695-1701 , discussion 1701–1703