Download PDF
Endoscopy 1999; 31(8): 687-694
DOI: 10.1055/s-1999-72
Special Topic
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ·New York

European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): Conclusion and WWW Site

J.-P. Vader 2 , F. Froehlich 1 , R. W. Dubois 3 , C. Beglinger 4 , V. Wietlisbach2 , V. Pittet2 , N. Ebel4 , J.-J. Gonvers1 , B. Burnand2
  • * Policlinique Médicale Universitaire, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • ** Institut Universitaire de Médecine Sociale et Préventive, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • *** Protocare Sciences, Santa Monica, USA
  • **** Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • ***** Gastroenterology Department, University of Basel, Switzerland
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 1999 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Background

Upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy are safe and accurate procedures which are widely used. Given the increasing need to ensure high quality of care within the current worldwide context of cost containment, appropriate use of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, such as GI endoscopy, is crucial. Clinical practice guidelines are designed to assist in this task; but they need to be based on well-documented and validated methods. One of the leading approaches is the RAND appropriateness method [1] [2] [3] which combines expert opinion with available scientific evidence. Studies comparing the Swiss and US panel-based criteria for the appropriateness of GI endoscopy have shown that the method is reliable [4] [5] . With criteria developed according to this method in 1994, we have assessed both over- and underutilisation of gastroscopy and colonoscopy in prospective studies [6] [7] [8] [9] .

Because no criteria were available to define the appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy on a European level, the aim of the Lausanne conference was to develop criteria of appropriateness and necessity, within a concerted action R&D project, to improve quality of care within the European Community. It should be added, however, that - given the significant differences in health care systems, care resources, mentalities and cultures within Europe - the multinational character of the Lausanne Conference does not preclude the possibility that criteria may be customized to the context of a particular country.

References

  • 1 Brook R H, Chassin M, Fink A, Solomon D H, Kosecoff J, Park R E. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies.  Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1986;  2 53-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Park R E, Fink A, Brook R H, Chassin M R, Kahn K L, Merrick N J, Kosecoff J, Solomon D H. Physician ratings of appropriate indications for six medical and surgical procedures.  Am J Public Health. 1986;  76 766-772
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook R H. Consensus Methods: Characteristics and Guidelines for Use.  Am J Public Health. 1984;  74 979-983
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Vader J P, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Dupriez K, Larequi-Lauber T, Pache I, Dubois R W, Gonvers J J, Brook R H. Appropriateness of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Comparison of American and Swiss criteria.  Int J Health Care. 1997;  9 87-92
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Burnand B, Vader J P, Froehlich F, Dupriez K, Larequi-Lauber T, Pache I, Dubois R W, Brook R H, Gonvers J J. Reliability of panel based guidelines for colonoscopy: an international comparison.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 162-166
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Froehlich F, Burnand B, Pache I, Vader J P, Fried M, Schneider C, Kosecoff J, Kolodny M, Dubois R W, Brook R H, et al. Overuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a country with open-access endoscopy: a prospective study in primary care.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 13-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Froehlich F, Pache I, Burnand B, Vader J P, Fried M, Kosecoff J, Kolodny M, Dubois R W, Brook R H, Gonvers J J. Underutilization of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 690-697
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Froehlich F, Pache I, Burnand B, Vader J P, Fried M, Beglinger C, Stalder G, Gyr K, Thorens J, Schneider C, et al. Performance of panel-based criteria to evaluate the appropriateness of colonoscopy: a prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 128-136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Froehlich F, Burnand B, Vader J P, Gonvers J J. Endoscopies: Too Many and Not Enough!.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 652-654
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Vader J P, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Dubois R W, Bochud M, Gonvers J J. The European Panel on Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE): Project and Methods.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 572-578
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Jadad A R. Randomised controlled trials: A user's guide.  London; BMJ Books 1998
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Hicks N R. Some observations on attempts to measure appropriateness of care.  BMJ. 1994;  309 730-733
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Shekelle P G, Kahan J P, Bernstein S J, Leape L L, Kamberg C J, Park R E. The Reproducibility of a Method to Identify the Overuse and Underuse of Medical Procedures.  N Engl J Med. 1998;  338 1888-1895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Froehlich F, Bochud M, Gonvers J J, Dubois R W, Vader J P, Wietlisbach V, Burnand B. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Dyspepsia.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 579-595
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bochud M, Gonvers J J, Vader J P, Dubois R W, Burnand B, Froehlich F. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Gastroesophageal reflux disease.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 596-603
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bochud M, Gonvers J J, Vader J P, Dubois R W, Burnand B, Froehlich F. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Barrett's esophagus.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 604-610
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Vader J P, Larequi-Lauber T, Froehlich F, Burnand B, Dubois R W, Gonvers J J. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Atypical chest pain.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 611-614
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 De Bosset V, Gonvers J J, Froehlich F, Dubois R W, Burnand B, Vader J P. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Bleeding and dysphagia.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 615-622
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gonvers J J, De Bosset V, Vader J P, Dubois R W, Burnand B, Froehlich F. Appropriateness of gastroscopy: Risk factors for gastric cancer.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 623-626
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 De Bosset V, Gonvers J J, Burnand B, Dubois R W, Vader J P, Froehlich F. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: Iron-deficiency anemia.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 627-630
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Gonvers J J, De Bosset V, Froehlich F, Dubois R W, Burnand B, Vader J P. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: Hemotochezia.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 631-636
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 De Bosset V, Gonvers J J, Vader J P, Dubois R W, Burnand B, Froehlich F. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: Lower abdominal pain or constipation.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 637-640
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Gonvers J J, Bochud M, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Dubois R W, Vader J P. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: Diarrhea.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 641-646
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Froehlich F, Larequi-Lauber T, Gonvers J J, Dubois R W, Burnand B, Vader J P. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: Inflammatory bowel disease.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 647-653
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Bochud M, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Dubois R W, Vader J P, Gonvers J J. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: Surveillance after polypectomy.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 654-663
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bochud M, Burnand B, Froehlich F, Dubois R W, Vader J P, Gonvers J J. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: Surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 664-672
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Burnand B, Bochud M, Froehlich F, Dubois R W, Vader J P, Gonvers J J. Appropriateness of colonoscopy: Screening for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic individuals.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 673-683
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Kahan J P, Bernstein S J, Leape L L, Hilborne L H, Park E, Parker L, Kamberg C J, Brook R H. Measuring the Necessity of Medical Procedures.  Med Care. 1994;  32 357-365
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Dubois R W, Lim D, Hebert P, Sherwood M, Growe G H, Hardy J F, Park P E, Waddell J P. The Development of indications for the Preoperative Use of Recombinant Erythropoietin.  Canadian Journal of Surgery. 1998;  41 351-365
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Haines A, Feder G. Guidance on guidelines. Writing them is easier than making them work.  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1992;  305 785-786
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Grimshaw J, Russell I. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines. I: Developing scientifically valid guidelines.  Qual Health Care. 1993;  2 243-248
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Grimshaw J M, Russell I T. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice.  Qual Health Care. 1994;  3 45-52
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Kosecoff J, Kanouse D E, Rogers W H, McCloskey L, Winslow C M, Brook R H. Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on Physician Practice.  JAMA. 1987;  258 2708-2713
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Karuza J, Calkins E, Feather J, Hershey C O, Katz L, Majeroni B. Enhancing Physician Adoption of Practice Guidelines.  Arch Intern Med. 1995;  155 625-632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Brook R H. Practice guidelines and practicing medicine: are they compatible?.  JAMA. 1989;  262 3027-3030
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Lomas J, Enkin M, Anderson G M, Hannah W J, Vayda E, Singer J. Opinion leaders vs audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines.  JAMA. 1991;  265 2202-2207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Audet A-M, Greenfield S, Field M. Medical Practice Guidelines: Current Activities and Future Directions.  Ann Intern Med. 1990;  113 709-714
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Wyatt J. Computer-based knowledge systems.  Lancet. 1991;  338 1431-1436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Forrest D, Hoskins A, Hussey R. Clinical guidelines and their implementation.  Postgrad Med. 1996;  72 19-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Safran C, Rind D M, Davis R B, Ives D, Sands D Z, Currier J, Slack W V, Cotton D J, Makadon H J. Effects of a knowledge-based electronic patient record and adherence to practice guidelines.  MD Computing. 1996;  13 55-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Lobach D F, Hammond W E. Development and Evaluation of a Computer-Assisted Management Protocol (CAMP): Improved Compliance with Care Guidelines for Diabetes Mellitus. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1994: 787-791
  • 42 Lowe H J, Lomax E C, Polonkey S E. The World Wide Web: A Review of an Emerging Internet-based Technology for the Distribution of Medical Information.  J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1996;  3 1-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Kahn K L, Kosecoff J, Chassin M R, Solomon D H, Brook R H. The use and misuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Ann Intern Med. 1988;  109 664-670
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Minoli G, Prada A, Gambetta G, Formenti A, Schalling R, Lai L, Pera A. The ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in an open access system.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  42 387-389
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Froehlich F, Burnand B, Pache I, Vader J P, Fried M, Kosecoff J, Kolodny M, Dubois R W, Brook R H, Gonvers J J. Overuse of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a country with open-access endoscopy.  Gastroenterology. 1996;  110 A17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Brook R H, Park R E, Chassin M R, Solomon D H, Keesey J, Kosecoff J. Predicting the appropriate use of carotid endarterectomy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and coronary angiography.  N Engl J Med. 1990;  323 1173-1177
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Chassin M R, Kosecoff J, Park R E, Winslow C M, Kahn K L, Merrick N J, Keesey J, Fink A, Solomon D H, Brook R H. Does Inappropriate use explain geographic variations in the use of Health Care Services? A study of three procedures.  JAMA. 1987;  258 2533-2537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Axon A TR, Bell G D, Jones R H, Quine M A, McCloy R F. Guidelines on appropriate indications for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  BMJ. 1995;  310 853-856
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Quine M A, McCloy R F, Devlin B H, Hopkins A. Appropriate use of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy - a prospective audit.  Gut. 1994;  35 1209-1214
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Seematter-Bagnoud L, Vader J P, Wietlisbach V, Froehlich F, Gonvers J J, Burnand B. Overuse and underuse of diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in various clinical settings. Int J Qual Health Care 1999: in press
  • 51 Minoli G, Prada A, Rocca F, et al. Appropriate use of colonoscopy in an open-access system (Abstract). Gastrointest Endosc 1995: 325
  • 52 Mahajan R J, Barthel J S, Marshall J B. Appropriateness of Referrals for Open-Access Endoscopy. How do physicians in different medical specialties do?.  Arch Intern Med. 1996;  156 2065-2069
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Pache I, Froehlich F, Schneider C, et al. Underuse and overuse of colonoscopy in primary care (Abstract).  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 A34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Jeannot J G, Vader J P, Porchet F, Larequi-Lauber T, Burnand B. Can the decision to operate be judged retrospectively? A study of medical records.  European Journal of Surgery. 1999;  165 516-521
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Caplan R A, Posner K L, Cheney F W. Effect of outcome on physician judgments of appropriateness of care.  JAMA. 1991;  265 1957-1960
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Lohr K N. Outcome Measurement: Concept and Questions.  Inquiry. 1988;  25 37-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Wofford J L, Moran W P, Drazen E, Metzger J, Stasior D, Little A, Greco P J, Eisenberg J M. Changing Physicians' Behavior.  N Engl J Med. 1994;  330 435-436
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Greco P J, Eisenberg J M. Changing physicians' practices.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  329 1271-1274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Davis D A, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines.  Can Med Assoc J. 1997;  157 408-416
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Sullivan F, Mitchell E. Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports.  BMJ. 1995;  311 848-852
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Grimshaw J, Freemantle N, Wallace S, Russell I, Hurwitz B, et al. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines.  Qual Health Care. 1995;  4 55-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Grimshaw J M, Russell I T. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations (see comments).  Lancet. 1993;  342 1317-1322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Naylor C D. What is appropriate care?.  N Engl J Med. 1998;  338 1918-1920
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. John-Paul Vader

IUMSP

Bugnon 17

CH-1005 Lausanne

Switzerland

Phone: + 41-21-3144954

Email: John-Paul.Vader@hospvd.ch

      >