Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2000; 21(8): 616-622
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-8482
Orthopedics and Clinical Science
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Physiological Cyclic Variation of the Myocardial Integrated Backscatter Signal in Athlete's Heart

D. Giorgi, V. Di Bello, A. Bertini, E. Talini, G. Valenti, A. Cioppi, S. Precisi, M. Pallini, L. Moretti, M.  T. Caputo, C. Giusti
  • Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Background: Left ventricular hypertrophy which realizes in athlete's heart could create some problems of acoustic reflection related to the increase of myocytic and not-myocytic elements of the heart. The aim of the present study was to analyze the ultrasonic backscatter myocardial indexes both as peak end-diastolic signal intensity and as its cardiac-cyclic variation in athlete's heart, compared to healthy sedentary controls. Methods: Two groups of ten subjects each, all males of mean age (31.6 ± 3.5), and of comparable weight and height were analyzed: group (A) comprised ten cyclists of good professional level and group (C) included ten healthy subjects acting as controls. A 2D-color Doppler echocardiography with a digital echograph Agilent Technologies (AT) Sonos 5500 was carried out on all subjects in the study for the conventional analysis of the left ventricular mass and function. The ultrasonic myocardial integrated backscatter signal (IBS) was analyzed with an “Acoustic Densitometry” module implemented on an AT echograph. The signal was also sampled with a R.O.I. placed at interventricular septum and at posterior left ventricular wall level. The systo-diastolic variation of the backscatter was also considered as Cyclic Variation Index (CVlibs). Results: The left ventricular mass was significantly higher in athletes in comparison with controls (LVMbs: A: 154.5 ± 18.7; C: 101.4 ± 12.4; p < 0.001). The end diastolic IBS signal did not show significant statistical differences between the two groups. The CVlibs both at septum (A: 30.5 ± 5.3; C: 27.2 ± 7.3; p < 0.002) and posterior wall level (A: 43.7 ± 9.1; C: 40.7 ± 9.1; p < 0.001) though was comparable in both groups. Conclusion: The conclusions reached in the present study confirmed the physiology of the left ventricular hypertrophy of the athlete's heart evaluated with an ultrasonic integrated backscatter tissue characterization, in particular through the cyclic variation of integrated backscatter myocardial signal. This finding is probably the expression of a preserved intramural myocardial function in the athlete's heart despite the increase of left ventricular mass induced by physical training.

Key words:

Ultrasonic tissue characterization, integrated backscatter, athlete's heart.

References

  • 1 Alwyn D'Sa H P. Acoustic Densitometry White Paper. Andover, Massachusetts; Hewlett-Packard Imaging Systems Division April 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Bhandari A K, Nanda N C. Myocardial texture characterization by two-dimensional Echocardiography.  Am J Cardiol. 1983;  51 817-825
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bland J M, Altman D G. Measurement error and correlations coefficients.  Br Med J. 1996;  31 341-342
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Burke E R. Physiological characteristics of competitive cyclists.  Physician Sports Med. 1980;  8 79-84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 De Maria A N, Neuman A, Lee G, Fowler W, Mason D T. Alterations in ventricular mass and performance induced by exercise training in man evaluated by echocardiography.  Circulation. 1978;  57 237-242
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 De Simone G, Daniels S R, Devereux R B, Meyer R A, Roman M J, De Divitiis O, Alderman M H. Left ventricular mass and body size in normotensive children and adults: assessment of allometric relations and impact of overweight.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;  20 1251-1260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Di Bello V, Lattanzi F, Picano E, Talarico L, Caputo M T, Di Muro C, Santoro G, Lunardi M, Distante A, Giusti C. Left ventricular performance and ultrasonic myocardial quantitative reflectivity in endurance senior athletes: an echocardiographic study.  Eur Heart J. 1993;  14 358-363
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Di Bello V, Pedrinelli R, Giorgi D, Bertini A, Talarico L, Caputo M T, Dell'omo G, Paterni M, Giusti C. Ultrasonic videodensitometric analysis of two different models of left ventricular hypertrophy: athlete's heart and hypertension.  Hypertension. 1997;  29 937-944
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Hoyt R H, Collins S L, Skorton D J, Ericksen E E, Conyers D C. Assessment of fibrosis in infarcted human hearts by analysis of ultrasonic backscatter.  Circulation. 1985;  71 740
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kanagy N L, Pawloski C M, Fink G D. Role of aldosterone in angiotensin II-induced hypertension in rats.  Am J Physiol. 1990;  259 R102-R109
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Katz A M. Cardiomyopathy of overload. A major determinant of prognosis in congestive heart failure.  N Engl J Med. 1990;  322 100-110
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lattanzi F, Di Bello V, Picano E, Caputo M T, Talarico L, Di Muro C, Landini L, Santoro G, Giusti C, Distante A. Normal ultrasonic myocardial reflectivity in athletes with increased left ventricular mass. A tissue characterization study.  Circulation. 1992;  85 1828-1834
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lattanzi F, Spirito P, Picano E, Mazzarisi A, Landini L, Distante A, Vecchio C, L'Abbate A. Quantitative assessment of ultrasonic myocardial reflectivity in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;  17 1085-1090
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lauer M S, Anderson K M, Larson M G, Levy D. A new method for indexing left ventricular mass for differences in body size.  Am J Cardiol. 1994;  74 487-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lythall D, Bishop J, Greenbaum R A, Ilsley C J, Mitchell A G, Gibson D G, Yacoub M H. Relationship between myocardial collagen on echo amplitude in nonfibrotic hearts.  Eur Heart J. 1993;  14 344-350
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Logan-Sinclair R, Wong C M, Gibson D G. Clinical application of amplitude processing of echocardiographic images.  Br Heart J. 1981;  45 621-627
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Madras E I, Barzilai E I, Sobel B E, Miller J G, Perez J G. Changes in myocardial backscatter throughout the cardiac cycle.  Ultrason imaging. 1983;  5 229-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Masuyama T, Nellessen U, Schnittger I, Tye T L, Haskell W L, Popp R L. Ultrasonic tissue characterization with real time integrated backscatter system in normal and aging human hearts.  J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;  14 1702-1708
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Masuyama T, St. Goar F G, Tye T L, Oppenheim G, Schnittger I, Popp R L. Ultrasonic tissue characterization of human hypertrophied hearts in vivo with cardiac cycle-dependent variation in integrated backscatter.  Circulation. 1989;  80 925-934
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mc Cole S D, Claney K, Conte J C, Anderson R, Hagberg J M. Energy expenditure during bicycling.  J Appl Physiol. 1990;  68 748-753
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Miller J G, Perez J E, Sobel B E. Ultrasonic characterization of myocardium.  Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1985;  28 85-110
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mimbs J W, O'Donnell M, Bauwens D, Miller J W, Sobel B E. The dependence of ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter on collagen content in dog and rabbit hearts.  Circ Res. 1980;  47 48-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Morgan H E, Baker K M. Cardiac hypertrophy: Mechanical neural, and endocrine dependence.  Circulation. 1991;  83 13-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mottley J G, Glueck R M, Perez J G, Sobel B E, Miller J G. Regional differences in cyclic variation of myocardial backscatter that parallel regional differences in contractile performance.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1984;  76 1617-1623
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Mottley J G, Miller J G. Anisotrophy of the ultrasonic backscatter of myocardial tissue. I. Theory and measurements in vitro.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1988;  83 755
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 O'Brien P D, O'Brien W D, Rhyne T L, Waltier D C, Sagar K B. Relation of ultrasonic backscatter and acoustic propagation properties in myofibrillar length and myocardial thickness.  Circulation. 1995;  91 171-175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Picano E, Pelosi G, Marzilli M, Lattanzi F, Benassi A, Landini L, L'Abbate A. In vivo quantitative ultrasonic evaluation of myocardial fibrosis in man.  Circulation. 1990;  81 58-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Rost R, Schneider K W, Stegmann N. A comparative echocardiographical examination of the hearts of highly trained athletes and untrained persons.  J Sports Med. 1975;  15 305
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sagar K B, Pelc L E, Rhyne T L, Wann L S, Waltier D C. Influence of heart rate, preload, afterload and inotropic state on myocardial ultrasonic backscatter.  Circulation. 1988;  77 478-483
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Sahn D J, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A. Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: Results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements.  Circulation. 1978;  58 1072-1083
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Skorton D J, Collins S M, Nichols J, Pandian N G, Bean J A, Kerber R E. Quantitative texture analysis in two-dimensional echocardiography: application to the diagnosis of experimental myocardial contusion.  Circulation. 1983;  68 217-223
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Skorton D, Miller J, Wickline S, Barzilai B, Collins S, Perez J. Ultrasonic characterization of cardiovascular tissue. In: Marcus M, Schelbert H, Skorton D, Wolf G (eds) Cardiac Imaging. Philadelphia; WB Saunders 1991: 538-556
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Wickline S A, Thomas L J III, Miller J G, Sobel B E, Perez J E. A relationship between ultrasonic integrated backscatter and myocardial contractile function.  J Clin Invest. 1985;  76 2151-2160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Wickline S A, Thomas L J III, Miller J G, Sobel B E, Perez J E. The dependence of myocardial ultrasonic integrated backscatter on contractile performance.  Circulation. 1985;  72 183-192
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Vitantonio Di Bello, M.D.

Department of Internal Medicine University of Pisa

Via Roma 67 56100 Pisa Italy

Phone: Phone:+ 39 (050) 993007

Fax: Fax:+ 39 (050) 993236 or 553414

Email: E-mail:dibellov@po.ifc.pi.cnr.it

      >