Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2000; 21(8): 586-592
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-8487
Training and Testing
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ·New York

Field Evaluation of the Computer Science and Application's Inc. Activity Monitor during Running and Skating Training in Adolescent Athletes

U. Ekelund1, 2 , A. Yngve1 , M. Sjöström1, 2 , K. Westerterp3
  • 1 Unit for Preventive Nutrition, Department of Medical Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
  • 2 Department of Physical Education and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
  • 3 Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

This study investigated the validity of the CSA activity monitor for assessment of the total amount of physical activity in adolescent athletes. Activity data were compared to data on daily energy expenditure and its derivatives measured by the doubly labeled water method. Seven athletes (speed skaters) with a mean age of 18.2 ± 1.1 y were monitored twice (off-season and pre-season) by the activity monitor for eight consecutive days. The primary training during the off-season period was running whereas the pre-season period mainly involved skate training (i.e. inline skating, slideboard training, and skating imitations). Activity counts were significantly correlated to all energy estimates during the off-season period (r = 0.93 - 0.96; P < 0.01) whereas not during the pre-season period (r = 0.32 - 0.57). A two-way multivariate analysis of variance showed a significant period effect for activity counts (668 ± 163 vs. 548 ± 91; P = 0.026) whereas not for total daily energy expenditure (15.7 ± 2.1 MJ × d-1 vs. 16.0 ± 1.0 MJ × d-1; P = 0.71). The relationship between activity counts and total daily energy expenditure seems to be affected by different training conditions. Therefore these circumstances have to be carefully considered in the interpretation of activity monitor data.

Key words:

Accelerometer, doubly labeled water, energy expenditure, physical activity.

References

  • 1 Almeras N O, Nimeault O, Seresse O, Boulay M R, Tremblay A. Non-exercise daily energy expenditure and physical activity patterns in male endurance athletes.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1991;  63 184-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Black A E, Prentice A M, Coward W A. Use of food quotients to predict respiratory quotients for the doubly-labeled water method for measuring energy expenditure.  Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1986;  40 381-391
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Boulay M R, Serresse O, Almeras N O, Tremblay A. Energy expenditure measurements in male cross-country skiers: comparison of two field methods.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;  26 248-253
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bouten C VC, Verboeket-Van De Venne W PHG, Westerterp K R, Verduin M, Jansen J D. Daily physical activity assessment: comparison between movement registration and doubly labeled water.  J Appl Physiol. 1996;  81 1019-1026
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ceesay S M, Prentice A M, Day K C, Murgatroyd P R, Goldberg G R, Scott W. The use of heart rate monitoring in the estimation of energy expenditure: a validation study using the whole-body calorimetry.  Br J Nutr. 1989;  61 175-186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Computer Science and Applications Inc .Wrist Activity Monitor Users Manual Model 7164. 
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Freedson P S, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. Accelerometer.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;  30 777-781
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hausswirth C, Bigard A X, Le Chevalier J M. The Cosmed K4 telemetry system as an accurate device for oxygen uptake measurements during exercise.  Int J Sports Med. 1997;  18 449-445
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Heini A F, Minghelli G, Diaz E, Prentice A M, Schutz Y. Free-living energy expenditure assessed by two different methods in rural Gambian men.  Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996;  50 284-289
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Johnson R K, Russ J, Goran M I. Physical activity energy expenditure in children by doubly labeled water as compared with the Caltrac accelerometer.  Int J Obes. 1998;  22 1046-1052
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 McArdle W D, Katch F I, Katch V L. Exercise Physiology. Baltimore; Wiliams & Wilkins 1996: 151
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Montoye H J, Kemper H CG, Saris W HM, Washburn R A. Measuring Physical Activity and Energy Expenditure. Champaign, IL; Human Kinetics 1996
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Murgatroyd P, Shetty P, Prentice A. Techniques for the measurement of human energy expenditure: a practical guide.  Int J Obes. 1993;  17 549-568
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Schoeller D A. Measurement of energy expenditure in free living humans by using doubly labeled water.  J Nutr. 1988;  118 1278-1289
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Schoeller D A, Racette S B. A review of field techniques for the assessment of energy expenditure.  J Nutr. 1990;  120 1492-1495
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Schofield W N, Schofield C, James W PT. Basal metabolic rate-review and prediction, together with an annotated bibliography of source material.  Hum Nutr: Clin Nutr. 1985;  39C (suppl.) 5-41
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Thompson J L. Energy balance in young athletes.  Int J Sports Nutr. 1998;  8 160-174
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Trost S G, Ward D S, Moorehead S M, Watson P D, Riner W, Burke J R. Validity of the computer and science applications (CSA) activity monitor in children.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;  30 629-633
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Tryon W W, Williams R. Fully proportional actigraphy: a new instrument.  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comp. 1996;  28 392-403
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Weir J B de V. New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism.  J Physiol. 1949;  109 1-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Westerterp K R, Brouns F, Saris W HM, Ten Hoor F. Comparison of doubly labeled water with respirometry at low- and high-activity levels.  J Appl Physiol. 1988;  65 53-56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Westerterp K R, Donkers J H, Fredrix E W, Boekhoudt P. Energy intake, physical activity and body weight: a simulation model.  Br J Nutr. 1995;  73 337-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Westerterp K R, Wouters L, Van Marken Lichtenbelt W D. The Maastricht protocol for the measurement of body composition and energy expenditure with labeled water.  Obes Res. 1995;  3 49-57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Åstrand P O, Rodahl K. Textbook of Work Physiology. New York; McGraw-Hill 1986: 188-190
    Google Scholar

U. Ekelund

Department of Physical Education and Health University of Örebro

70182 Örebro Sweden

Phone: Phone:+ 46 (19) 303371

Fax: Fax.+ 46 (19) 303486

Email: E-mail:ulf.ekelund@ioh.oru.se

      >