Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2001; 17(4): 289-294
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-18828
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Z-Plasty: A Concise Review

Christopher R. Hove1 , Edwin F. Williams, III2 , Bret J. Rodgers3
  • 1Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
  • 2Section of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY
  • 3Rodgers Center for Facial Plastic Surgery, Boise, ID
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 December 2001 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

One of the most commonly used techniques in facial plastic surgery is the Z-plasty. Main reasons to perform these transposition flaps are to lengthen a pre-existing scar, to camouflage a scar, or to realign a scar. The classic 60° Z-plasty allows a 75% increase in scar length and is the cornerstone against which all variations are compared. Understanding the classic Z-plasty permits the surgeon to expand his or her repertoire to include the numerous variations thereof. The double-opposing Z-plasty, unequal triangle Z-plasty, four-flap Z-plasty, compound Z-plasty, and planimetric Z-plasty are the most frequent variants of the basic Z-plasty. Each are presented with illustrations and clinical indications.

KEYWORD

Z-plasty - transposition flaps - scar revision

REFERENCES

  • 1 Fricke J C. Bildung nerur augenlider nach zerstorung und dadurch hervorgebrachter auswartswendung derselben. Hamburg, Germany: Perthes & Basse: 1829:75-77
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Horner W E. Clinical report on the surgical department of the Philadelphia Hospital, Blackley, for the months of May, June, and July.  Am J Med Sci . 1837;  21 99-102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Serre M. Traite sus l'art de restaurer led deformites de la face, selon la methode par deplacement, ou methode francaise. Montpelier, France: L Castel: 1842:23-24
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Denonvilliers C P. Blepharoplastie.  Bull Soc Chir . 1856;  7 213
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 McCurdy S L. Correction of burn scar deformity by the Z-plastic method.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1924;  6 683-688
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Berger P. Autoplastic par dedoublement de la palmure et echange de la lambeaux. In: Berger P, Banzat S, eds. Chivurgie Orthopedique Paris, France: G Steinheil: 1904: 180-187
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Morestin H. De la correction des flexions permanents des doigts consectives aux panaris et aux phlegmons de la paume de la main.  Revue de Chir . 1914;  50 1-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Limberg A A. Design of local flaps. In: Gibson T, ed. Modern Trends in Plastic Surgery London, England: Butterworth: 1966: 38-61
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Borges A F, Gibson T. The original Z-plasty.  Br J Plast Surg . 1973;  26 237-246
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Davis W E, Renner G J. Z-plasty. In: Thomas JR, ed. Scar Revision St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book 1989: 137-145
    Google Scholar
  • 11 McCarthy J G. Introduction to plastic surgery. In: McCarthy JG, ed. Plastic Surgery Vol 1, General Principles Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders 1990: 55-63
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Davidson T M. Lacerations and scar revision. In: Cummings CW, et al. eds. Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery St. Louis: Mosby 1998: 431-452
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Fonseca R J, Walker R V. Oral and maxillofacial trauma 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co; . 1997: 864-866
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Furnas D W, Fischer G W. The Z-plasty: biomechanics and mathematics.  Br J Plast Surg . 1971;  24 144-160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Roggendorf E. The planimetric Z-plasty.  Plast Reconstr Surg . 1983;  71(6) 834-842
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Suzuki S, Um S C, Kim B M. Versatility of modified planimetric Z-plasties in the treatment of scar with contracture.  Br J Plast Surg . 1998;  51 363-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
      >