Download PDF
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2001; 05(4): 293-304
DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-19040
Copyright © 2001 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Clinical Imaging of Articular Cartilage in the Knee

Thomas R. McCauley1 , Michael P. Recht2 , David G. Disler3
  • 1Department of Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
  • 2Department of Radiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
  • 3Department of Radiology, Commonwealth Radiology and Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
17 December 2001 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Assessment of articular cartilage has become an essential part of magnetic resonance (MR) evaluation of the knee. This has occurred because of recent advances in treatment along with improved accuracy of MR image evaluation of articular cartilage. Detection of articular cartilage defects can provide an explanation for symptoms and allow identification of patients for cartilage therapy and is an important factor for predicting prognosis of patients with knee injury. This review describes the most easily implemented MR techniques for evaluation of articular cartilage and the normal and abnormal appearance of cartilage seen using these techniques. The influence of imaging findings on treatment is described.

KEYWORD

Cartilage - magnetic resonance techniques - magnetic resonance appearance

REFERENCES

  • 1 Lawrence R C, Hochberg M C, Kelsey J L. Estimates of the prevalence of selected arthritic and musculoskeletal diseases in the United States.  J Rheumatol . 1989;  16 427-441
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Peyron J G, Altman R D. The epidemiology of osteoarthritis. In: Moskowitz RW, Howell DS, Goldberg VM, Mankin HJ, eds. Osteoarthritis, 2nd ed Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1992: 15-37
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Disler D G, McCauley T R, Kelman C G. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy.  Am J Roentgenol . 1996;  167 127-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Curl W W, Krome J, Gordon E S, Rushing J, Smith B P, Poehling G G. Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies.  Arthroscopy . 1997;  13 456-460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Messner K, Maletius W. The long-term prognosis for severe damage to weight-bearing cartilage in the knee: a 14-year clinical and radiographic follow-up in 28 young athletes.  Acta Orthop Scand . 1996;  67 165-168
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Buckwalter J A, Mankin H J. Articular cartilage repair and transplantation.  Arthritis Rheum . 1998;  41 1331-1342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bentley G, Minas T. Treating joint damage in young people.  Br Med J . 2000;  320 1585-1588
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dandy D J, Jackson R W. Meniscectomy and chondromalacia of the femoral condyle.  J Bone Joint Surg Am . 1975;  57 1116-1119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Roos H, Lauren M, Adalberth T, Roos E M, Jonsson K, Lohmander L S. Knee osteoarthritis after meniscectomy: prevalence of radiographic changes after twenty-one years, compared with matched controls.  Arthritis Rheum . 1998;  41 687-693
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Maletius W, Messner K. Chondral damage and age depress the long-term prognosis after partial meniscectomy. A 12- to 15-year follow-up study.  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc . 1996;  3 211-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Maletius W, Messner K. Eighteen- to twenty-four-year follow-up after complete rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament.  Am J Sports Med . 1999;  27 711-717
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ferretti A, Conteduca F, De Carli A, Fontana M, Mariani P P. Osteoarthritis of the knee after ACL reconstruction.  Int Orthop . 1991;  15 367-371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Northmore-Ball M D, Dandy D J. Long-term results of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.  Clin Orthop . 1982;  167 34-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Minas T, Nehrer S. Current concepts in the treatment of articular cartilage defects.  Orthopedics . 1997;  20 525-538
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 McCauley T R, Disler D G. MR imaging of articular cartilage.  Radiology . 1998;  209 629-640
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hardy P A, Recht M P, Piraino D W. Fat suppressed MRI of articular cartilage with a spatial-spectral excitation pulse.  J Magn Reson Imag . 1998;  8 1279-1287
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Potter H G, Linklater J M, Allen A A, Hannafin J A, Haas S B. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee. An evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging.  J Bone Joint Surg . 1998;  80-A 1276-1284
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bradella M A, Tirman P FJ, Peterfy C G. Accuracy of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients.  Am J Roentgenol . 1999;  172 1073-1080
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Chandnani V P, Ho C, Chu P, Trudell D, Resnick D. Knee hyaline cartilage evaluated with MR imaging: a cadaveric study involving multiple imaging sequences and intraarticular injection of gadolinium and saline solution.  Radiology . 1991;  178 557-561
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kramer J, Recht M P, Imhof H, Stiglbauer R, Engel A. Postcontrast MR arthrography in assessment of cartilage lesions.  J Comput Assist Tomogr . 1994;  18 218-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kramer J, Stiglbauer R, Engel A, Prayer L, Imhof H. MR contrast arthrography (MRA) in osteochondrosis dissecans.  J Comput Assist Tomogr . 1992;  16 254-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Brossmann J, Preidler K W, Daenen B. Imaging of osseous and cartilaginous intraarticular bodies in the knee: Comparison of MR imaging and MR arthrography with CT and CT arthrography in cadavers.  Radiology . 1996;  200 509-517
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Erickson S J, Waldschmidt J G, Czervionke L F, Prost R W. Hyaline cartilage: truncation artifact as a cause of trilaminar appearance with fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled sequences.  Radiology . 1996;  201 260-264
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Rubenstein J D, Kim J K, Henkelman R M. Effects of compression and recovery on bovine articular cartilage: appearance on MR images.  Radiology . 1996;  201 843-850
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Waldschmidt J G, Rilling R J, Kajdacsy-Balla A A, Boynton M D, Erickson S J. In vitro and in vivo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage: zonal anatomy, imaging pitfalls, and pathologic conditions.  Radiographics . 1997;  17 1387-1402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Recht M P, Piraino D W, Paletta G A, Schils J P, Belhobek G H. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities.  Radiology . 1996;  198 209-212
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Rubin D A, Harner C D, Costello J M. Treatable chondral injuries in the knee: frequency of associated focal subchondral edema.  Am J Roentgenol . 2000;  174 1099-1106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 McCauley T R, Kornaat P R, Jee W H. Central osteophytes in the knee: prevalence and association with cartilage defects on MR imaging.  Am J Roentgenol . 2001;  176 359-364
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Rubenstein J D, Li J G, Majumdar S, Henkelman R M. Image resolution and signal-to-noise ratio requirements for MR imaging of degenerative cartilage.  Am J Roentgenol . 1997;  169 1089-1096
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Mosher T J, Pruett S W. Magnetic resonance imaging of superficial cartilage lesions: role of contrast in lesion detection.  J Magn Reson Imag . 1999;  10 178-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Mandelbaum B R, Browne J E, Fu F. Articular cartilage lesions of the knee.  Am J Sports Med . 1998;  26 853-861
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Vangsness C T. Overview of treatment options for arthritis in the active patient.  Clin Sports Med . 1999;  18 1-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Mori R, Ochi M, Sakai Y, Adachi N, Uchio Y. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for focal chondral lesions.  Magn Reson Imag . 1999;  17 1135-1140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Buckwalter J A, Mow V C, Ratcliff A. Restoration of injured or degenerated articular cartilage.  J Am Acad Orthop Surg . 1994;  2 192-201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Waldschmidt J G, Braunstein E M, Buckwalter K A. Magnetic resonance imaging of osteoarthritis.  Rheum Dis Clin North Am . 1999;  25 451-465
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Ike R W. The role of arthroscopy in differential diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the knee.  Rheum Dis Clin North Am . 1993;  19 673-696
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Buckwalter J A, Mow V C. Cartilage repair in osteoarthritis. In: Moskowitz RW, Howell DS, Goldberg VM, Mankin HJ, eds. Osteoarthritis, 2nd ed Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1992: 71-107
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Bohndorf K. Osteochondritis (osteochondrosis) dissecans: a review and new MRI classification.  Eur Radiol . 1998;  8 103-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Bohndorf K. Imaging of acute injuries of the articular surfaces (chondral, osteochondral and subchondral fractures).  Skeletal Radiol . 1999;  28 545-560
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Johnson D L, Urban Jr P W, Caborn D N, Vanarthos W J, Carlson C S. Articular cartilage changes seen with magnetic resonance imaging-detected bone bruises associated with acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture.  Am J Sports Med . 1998;  26 409-414
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Lahm A, Erggelet C, Steinwachs M, Reichelt A. Articular and osseous lesions in recent ligament tears: arthroscopic changes compared with magnetic resonance imaging findings.  Arthroscopy . 1998;  14 597-604
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Bashir A, Gray M, Boutin R D, Burstein D. Glycosaminoglycan in articular cartilage: in vivo assessment with delayed Gd(DTPA)2-enhanced MR imaging.  Radiology . 1997;  205 551-558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 van der Linden E, Kroon H M, Doornbos J, Hermans J, Bloem J L. MR imaging of hyaline cartilage at 0.5 T: a quantitative and qualitative in vitro evaluation of three types of sequences.  Skeletal Radiol . 1998;  27 297-305
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
      >