Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2002; 23(3): 191-195
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-23178
Physiology and Biochemistry
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Relationships Between Aerobic Energy Cost, Performance and Kinematic Parameters in Roller Ski Skating

Aerobic Energy Cost of Roller Ski SkatingG.  Y.  Millet1 , S.  Perrey2 , R.  Candau3 , J.  D.  Rouillon2
  • 1Groupe Analyse du Mouvement - Faculté des Sciences du Sport, Dijon Cedex, France
  • 2Laboratoire des Sciences du Sport - UFR STAPS, Besançon, France
  • 3Laboratoire Sport, Performance, Santé - Faculté des Sciences du Sport, Montpellier, France
Further Information

Publication History

August 25, 2001

Publication Date:
26 March 2002 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The aims of this study were to test the hypotheses that 1) the aerobic energy cost of roller ski skating (CS) is significantly related to level of performance and 2) a significant part of inter-individual differences of CS can be explained by kinematic parameters of skating locomotion. Oxygen uptake, kinematics of the knee and ankle joint , EMG of the vastus lateralis (VL) and gastrocnemius lateralis (GL) muscles, and roller ski velocity were recorded in 13 skiers who roller skied at 19.0 ± 0.1 km × h-1. CS was found to be 2.51 ± 0.35 J × kg-1 × m-1 and significantly correlated with the skiers’ level of performance (r = 0.61; p < 0.05). Significant relationships were found between CS and 1) knee angular amplitude (r = 0.75; p < 0.01) during the concentric phase, 2) VL average EMG during the concentric phase (r = 0.72; p < 0.01) and 3) VL and GL average EMG during the eccentric phase (p < 0.05). The results of this study showed that a significant part of performance could be explained by the aerobic energy cost of locomotion in skating. It can also be suggested that differences in upper/lower body utilization and/or in mechanical efficiency may explain the differences in CS.

Key words

EMG - joint kinematics - stretch-shortening cycle

References

  • 1 Anderson T. Biomechanics and running economy.  Sports Med. 1996;  22 76-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Belli A. Measurements of mechanical factors of running efficiency. In: Marconnet P, Saltin B, Komi PV, Poortmans J (eds) Human muscular function during dynamic exercise. Basel; Karger 1996: 57-70
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Bergh U, Forsberg A. Cross-country ski racing. In: Shepard RJ, Astrand PO (eds) Endurance in sport. Oxford; Blackwell Sciences 1992: 570-581
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Bosco C, Montanari G, Ribacchi R, Giovanelli P, Latterai F, Iachelli G, Faina M, Colli R, Dal Monte A, La Rosa M, Cortili G, Saibene F. Relationship between efficiency of muscular work during jumping and the energetics of running.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1987;  56 138-143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bouisset S, Maton B. Muscles posture et mouvement. Bases et applications de la méthode électromyographique. Paris; Hermann 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Bourdin M, Belli A, Arsac L, Bosco C, Lacour J R. Effect of vertical loading on energy cost and kinematics of running in trained male subjects.  J Appl Physiol. 1995;  79 2078-2085
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bunc V, Heller J, Dlouha R, Leso J. Energy cost of running in men.  Med Sport. 1994;  47 1-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Candau R, Belli A, Millet G Y, Georges D, Barbier B, Rouillon J D. Energy cost and running mechanics during a treadmill run to volitional exhaustion.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1998;  77 479-485
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Chatard J C, Lavoie J M, Lacour J R. Analysis of determinants of swimming economy in front crawl.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1990;  61 88-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Conley D L, Krahenbuhl G S. Running economy and distance running performance of highly trained athletes.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1980;  12 357-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dengel D R, Flynn M G, Costill D L. Determinants of success during triathlon performance.  Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989;  60 234-238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Foster C, Daniels J T, Yarbrough R A. Physiological and training correlates of marathon running performance.  Aust J Sports Med. 1977;  9 58-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Harkins K J. Metabolic cost comparison of cross-country skiing between elite and non-elite.  Can J Sport Sci. 1978;  3 186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Hoffman M D, Clifford P S, Foley P, Brice A G. Physiological responses to different roller skiing techniques.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990;  22 391-396
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Komi P V, Kyrolainen H. Mechanical efficiency of stretch-shortening cycle exercise. In: Marconnet P, Saltin B, Komi PV, Poortmans J (eds) Human muscular function during dynamic exercise. Basel; Karger 1996: 44-56
    Google Scholar
  • 16 MacDougall J D, Hughson R, Sutton J R, Moroz J R. The energy cost of cross-country skiing among elite competitors.  Med Sci Sports. 1979;  11 270-273
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Millet G Y, Hoffman M D, Candau R B, Clifford P S. Poling forces during roller skiing: effects of technique and speed.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;  30 1645-1653
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Millet G Y, Perrey S, Candau R B, Belli A, Borrani F, Rouillon J D. External loading does not change energy cost and mechanics of roller ski skating.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1998;  78 276-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Morgan D W, Baldini F D, Martin P E, Kohrt W M. Ten kilometer performance and predicted velocity at V˙O2max among well-trained male runners.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989;  21 78-83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ng A V, Demment R B, Basset D R, Bussan M J, Clark R R, Kuta J M. Characteristics and performance of male citizen cross-country ski racers.  Int J Sports Med. 1988;  9 205-209
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Noakes T D. Implications of exercise testing for prediction of athletic performance: a contemporary perspective.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988;  20 319-330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Pendergast D R, Di Prampero P E, Craig A B, Wilson D R, Rennie D W. Quantitative analysis of the front crawl in men and women.  J Appl Physiol. 1977;  43 475-479
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Perrey S, Millet G Y, Candau R B, Rouillon J D. Stretch-shortening cycle in roller ski skating: effects of technique.  Int J Sports Med. 1998;  19 513-520
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sjodin B, Svendenhag J. Applied physiology of marathon running.  Sports Med. 1985;  2 83-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sleivert G G, Wenger H A. Physiological predictors of short-course triathlon performance.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993;  25 871-876
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Street G M. Kinetic analysis of the V1 skating technique during roller skiing. Doctoral dissertation. Pennsylvania State University 1988
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Williams K R, Cavanagh P R. Biomechanical correlates with running economy in elite distance runners. Proceedings of the North American Congress on Biomechanics. Montréal; 1986: 287-288
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Williams K R, Cavanagh P R. Relationship between distance running mechanics, running economy, and performance.  J Appl Physiol. 1987;  63 1236-1245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

G. Y. Millet

Faculté des Sciences du Sport

BP 27877 · 21078 Dijon Cedex · France ·

Phone: +33 3 80 39 67 59

Fax: +33 3 80 39 67 02

Email: gmillet@u-bourgogne.fr

      >