Semin Speech Lang 2002; 23(3): 165-172
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-33749
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Diagnosing Stuttering in the School Environment

Michael Susca
  • University of the Pacific, Stockton, California[ep
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
03 September 2002 (online)

ABSTRACT

School speech-language pathologists work in settings that present multiple challenges to diagnosing stuttering in students. Perceiving stuttering as a communication impairment allows integration of various issues with criteria from the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act 1997 into an effective diagnostic plan. Assessment from multiple perspectives reveals motor, linguistic, social, affective, and cognitive issues related to communication and educational competencies. Common sense and pragmatic communication concerns related to children who stutter are described. Clinical questions, observations, issues, and tasks are explored as parts of the assessment process. The multidimensional assessment of student-centered issues helps the clinician determine eligibility qualifications, develop individual education plans, and meet full-inclusion educational requirements.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Brisk D J, Healey E C, Hux K A. Clinicians' training and confidence associated with treating school-age children who stutter: a national survey.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Schools . 1997;  28 164-176
  • 2 Meyers F, Wall M. Toward an integrated approach to early childhood stuttering.  J Fluency Disord . 1982;  7 47-54
  • 3 Zimmerman G. Stuttering: a disorder of movement.  J Speech Hear Res . 1980;  23 122-136
  • 4 Smith A, Kelly E. Stuttering: a dynamic, multifactorial model. In: Curlee RF, Siegel GM, eds. Nature and Treatment of Stuttering Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 1997
  • 5 Smith A. Stuttering: A unified approach to a multifactorial, dynamic disorder. In: Bernstein Ratner N, Healey EC, eds. Stuttering Research and Practice: Bridging the Gap Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc 1999: 27-44
  • 6 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amendments, 20 USC 1401(3)(A) and (B)1401(26) . 
  • 7 Riley G, Riley J. A revised component model for diagnosing and treating children who stutter.  Contemp Issues Commun Sci Disord . 2000;  27 188-199
  • 8 Conture E G. Stuttering: Its Nature, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon 2001
  • 9 Riley G. Stuttering Severity Instrument of Children and Adults-Third Edition (SSI-3).  Austin TX: Pro-Ed 1994
  • 10 Lewis K E. Do SSI-3 scores adequately reflect observations of stuttering behaviors?.  Am J Speech-Language Pathol . 1995;  4 46-59
  • 11 Conture E. Working effectively with school children (K-12) who stutter. Short course presented at the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; Nov. 15-18, 2001; New Orleans, LA
  • 12 Burks H. Burks Behavior Rating Scales.  Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services 1976
  • 13 De Nil F L, Brutten G J. Speech-associated attitudes of stuttering and nonstuttering children.  J Speech Hear Res . 1991;  34 60-66
  • 14 McDevitt S, Carey W. Behavioral Style Questionnaire.  West Chester, PA: Temperametrics 1995
  • 15 Brutten E, Shoemaker D. Speech Situation Checklist. In: The Southern Illinois Behavior Checklist Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University 1974
  • 16 Andre S, Guitar G. The A-19 scale for children who stutter. In: Peters T, Guitar B Stuttering, An Integrated Approach to Its Nature and Treatment Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins 1991: 179
  • 17 Brutten E, Shoemaker D. Fear Survey Schedule. In: The Southern Illinois Behavior Checklist Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University 1974
  • 18 Cooper E. Personalized Fluency Control Therapy.  Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources 1985
  • 19 Goldberg S A. Behavioral Cognitive Therapy.  Tigard, OR: CC Publications 1981
    >