Download PDF
Semin Neurol 2002; 22(2): 143-148
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-36537
Copyright © 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

Cervical Myelopathy Associated with Degenerative Spine Disease and Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament

Meic H. Schmidt1 , Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa2 , William S. Rosenberg3
  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • 2Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
  • 3Midwest Neurosurgery Associates, Kansas City, Missouri
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
13 January 2003 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament are two of the leading etiologies of spinal cord damage in older patients. For most patients, the natural history is one of slow stepwise decline in function. With nonsurgical therapy only 30 to 50% of patients are expected to stabilize. Surgical options include anterior and posterior surgical decompression, spinal canal expansion, and spinal column stabilization. Prospective, randomized trials with standardized outcome measures are needed to clarify the benefit of surgery conclusively.

KEYWORDS

Cervical myelopathy - ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament - cervical spondylotic myelopathy - surgery

REFERENCES

  • 1 Gore D R, Sepic S B, Gardner G M. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people.  Spine . 1986;  11 521-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Koyanagi I, Iwasaki Y, Hida K, Imamura H, Abe H. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.  J Neurosurg . 1998;  88 247-254
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kurata A, Tokiwa K, Kitahara I. [Myelopathy caused by hypertrophy of the posterior longitudinal ligament (HPLL): case report].  No Shinkei Geka Neurol Surg. 1987;  15 651-655
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Harsh G RT, Sypert G W, Weinstein P R, Ross D A, Wilson C B. Cervical spine stenosis secondary to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.  J Neurosurg. 1987;  67 349-357
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Burrows H. The sagittal diameter of the spinal canal in cervical spondylosis.  Clin Radiol . 1963;  14 77-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Adams C B, Logue V. Studies in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: II. The movement and contour of the spine in relation to the neural complications of cervical spondylosis.  Brain . 1971;  94 568-586
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cusick J F. Pathophysiology and treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.  Clin Neurosurg . 1991;  37 661-681
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Edwards W C, LaRocca H. The developmental segmental sagittal diameter of the cervical spinal canal in patients with cervical spondylosis.  Spine . 1983;  8 20-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Yue W M, Tan S B, Tan M H, Koh D C, Tan C T. The Torg-Pavlov ratio in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a comparative study between patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and a nonspondylotic, nonmyelopathic population.  Spine . 2001;  26 1760-1764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hukuda S, Wilson C B. Experimental cervical myelopathy: effects of compression and ischemia on the canine cervical cord.  J Neurosurg . 1972;  37 631-652
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Taylor A. Vascular factors in the myelopathy associated with cervical spondylosis.  Neurology . 1964;  14 62-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Clifton A G, Stevens J M, Whitear P, Kendall B E. Identifiable causes for poor outcome in surgery for cervical spondylosis: post-operative computed myelography and MR imaging.  Neuroradiology . 1990;  32 450-455
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Phillips D G. Surgical treatment of myelopathy with cervical spondylosis.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1973;  36 879-884
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Reale F. Long-term results in 102 cases of cervical myeloradiculopathy operated on for spondylosis and disc herniation.  Ital J Neurol Sci . 1983;  4 291-296
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Signorini G C, Beltramello A, Pinna G, Dalle Ore G. The significance of preoperative neurological disorders in predicting outcome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy after surgery.  J Neurosurg Sci . 1984;  28 89-92
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Teresi L M, Lufkin R B, Reicher M A. Asymptomatic degenerative disk disease and spondylosis of the cervical spine: MR imaging.  Radiology . 1987;  164 83-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Clarke E, Robinson P. Cervical myelopathy: a complication of cervical spondylosis.  Brain . 1956;  79 483-510
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lees F, Turner J. Natural history and prognosis of cervical spondylosis.  Br Med J . 1963;  2 1607-1610
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Nurick S. The natural history and the results of surgical treatment of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis.  Brain . 1972;  95 101-108
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Symon L, Lavender P. The surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy.  Neurology . 1967;  17 117-127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 LaRocca H. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: natural history.  Spine . 1988;  13 854-855
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Carol M P, Ducker T B. Cervical spondylitic myelopathies: surgical treatment.  J Spinal Disord . 1988;  1 59-65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Teramoto T, Ohmori K, Takatsu T. Long-term results of the anterior cervical spondylodesis.  Neurosurgery . 1994;  35 64-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M, Asano M, Ono K. Laminoplasty versus subtotal corpectomy: a comparative study of results in multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy.  Spine . 1992;  17 1281-1284
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Sampath P, Bendebba M, Davis J D, Ducker T B. Outcome of patients treated for cervical myelopathy: a prospective, multicenter study with independent clinical review.  Spine . 2000;  25 670-676
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cusick J F, Yoganandan N, Pintar F, Myklebust J, Hussain H. Biomechanics of cervical spine facetectomy and fixation techniques.  Spine . 1988;  13 808-812
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cusick J F, Pintar F A, Yoganandan N. Biomechanical alterations induced by multilevel cervical laminectomy.  Spine . 1995;  20 2392-2398
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Benzel E. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: posterior surgical approaches. In: Menezes A, Sonntag V, Benzel E, Cahill D, McCormick P, Papadopoulos S, eds. Principles of Spinal Surgery Vol. 1. New York: McGraw-Hill 1996: 571-580
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Hirabayashi K, Satomi K. Operative procedure and results of expansive open-door laminoplasty.  Spine . 1988;  13 870-876
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Itoh T, Tsuji H. Technical improvements and results of laminoplasty for compressive myelopathy in the cervical spine.  Spine . 1985;  10 729-736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Tanaka J, Seki N, Tokimura F, Doi K, Inoue S. Operative results of canal-expansive laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in elderly patients.  Spine . 1999;  24 2308-2312
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Shimamura T, Kato S, Toba T, Yamazaki K, Ehara S. Sagittal splitting laminoplasty for spinal canal enlargement for ossification of the spinal ligaments (OPLL and OLF).  Semin Musculoskeletal Radiol . 2001;  5 203-206
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Wada E, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years.  Spine . 2001;  26 1443-1447
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Lowery G L, McDonough R F. The significance of hardware failure in anterior cervical plate fixation: patients with 2- to 7-year follow-up.  Spine . 1998;  23 181-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Onari K, Akiyama N, Kondo S. Long-term follow-up results of anterior interbody fusion applied for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.  Spine . 2001;  26 488-493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Abe H, Tsuru M, Ito T, Iwasaki Y, Koiwa M. Anterior decompression for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine.  J Neurosurg . 1981;  55 108-116
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kojima T, Waga S, Kubo Y. Anterior cervical vertebrectomy and interbody fusion for multi-level spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.  Neurosurgery . 1989;  24 864-872
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Zdeblick T A, Bohlman H H. Cervical kyphosis and myelopathy: treatment by anterior corpectomy and strut-grafting.  J Bone Joint Surg Am . 1989;  71 170-182
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Fernyhough J C, White J I, LaRocca H. Fusion rates in multilevel cervical spondylosis comparing allograft fibula with autograft fibula in 126 patients.  Spine . 1991;  16(suppl 10) S561-S564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Mizuno J, Nakagawa H. Outcome analysis of anterior decompressive surgery and fusion for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: report of 107 cases and review of literature.  Neurosurg Focus . 2001;  10 1-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Epstein J E, Epstein N E. The surgical management of cervical spinal stenosis, spondylosis and myeloradiculopathy by means of the posterior approach. In: Sherk H, Dunn E, Eismont F, eds. The Cervical Spine 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott 1989: 625-643
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, Taketomi E, Ueyama K. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy.  Spine . 2001;  26 1890-1894
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
      >