Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2004; 20(1): 47-50
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-822958
Copyright © 2004 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001 USA.

Microdermabrasion: A Review

Rebecca Shpall1 , Frederick C. Beddingfield2 , 3  III , Deborah Watson4 , Gary P. Lask2
  • 1College of Medicine, University of California at Irvine, Irvine, CA
  • 2Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
  • 3RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California
  • 4Division of Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
22 March 2004 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Microdermabrasion is used by clinicians and aestheticians worldwide to rejuvenate facial skin. The microdermabrator contains aluminum oxide or sodium chloride crystals that strike the skin and produce superficial trauma. It is theorized that the repetitive intraepidermal injury causes gradual improvement in damaged skin by stimulating fibroblast proliferation and collagen production, leading to new collagen deposition in the dermis. In this review of microdermabrasion, we discuss studies performed to elucidate the mechanism of action by which microdermabrasion promotes facial resurfacing. We also discuss other existing techniques for facial rejuvenation and resurfacing.

KEYWORDS

Microdermabrasion - review - resurfacing - rejuvenation

REFERENCES

  • 1 Lawrence N, Mandy S, Yarborough J et al.. History of dermabrasion.  Dermatol Surg. 2000;  26 95-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Tsai R Y, Wang C N, Chan H L. Aluminum oxide crystal microdermabrasion: a new technique for treating facial scarring.  Dermatol Surg. 1995;  21 539-542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Shim E, Barnette D, Hughes K, Greenway H. Microdermabrasion: a clinical and histopathologic study.  Dermatol Surg. 2001;  27 524-530
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Perez E, Ibiett E. Gross and microscopic findings in patients undergoing microdermabrasion for facial rejuvenation.  Dermatol Surg. 2001;  27 637-640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Freedman B, Rueda-Pedraza E, Waddell S. The epidermal and dermal changes associated with microdermabrasion.  Dermatol Surg. 2001;  27 1031-1034
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Tan M, Spencer J, Peres L, Aimeri J, Skover G. The evaluation of aluminum oxide crystal microdermabrasion for photodamage.  Dermatol Surg. 2001;  27 943-949
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Rajan P, Grimes P. Skin barrier changes induced by aluminum oxide and sodium chloride microdermabrasion.  Dermatol Surg. 2002;  28 390-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Farris P, Rietschel R. An unusual acute urticarial response following microdermabrasion.  Dermatol Surg. 2002;  28 606-608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Alam M, Omura N, Dover J, Arndt K. Glycolic acid peels compared to microdermabrasion: a right-left controlled trial of efficacy and patient satisfaction.  Dermatol Surg. 2002;  28 475-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hernandez-Perez E, Ibiett E. Gross and microscopic findings in patients submitted to nonablative full-face resurfacing using intense pulsed light: a preliminary study.  Dermatol Surg. 2000;  28 651-655
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Frederick C Beddingfield, IIIM.D. Ph.D. 

Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 52-121 CHS

10833 LeConte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095-1750

Email: fbeddingfield@mednet.ucla.edu

      >