Two-stage treatment with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) compared with single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with possible choledocholithiasis

Background and study aims: An ideal treatment for choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era has not been established. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether a treatment strategy of performing intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during laparascopic cholecystectomy (when choledocholithiasis is confirmed by intraoperative cholangiography) is better for patients with suspected common bile duct stones than the current strategy (preoperative ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy).
Patients and methods: This was a prospective randomized study to evaluate which of these two approaches was most benefit- and cost-effective for patients with intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis. Patients underwent either preoperative ERCP followed by a laparoscopic cholecystectomy a few weeks later (the “preoperative ERCP” group) or intraoperative ERCP (the “intraoperative ERCP” group). Intraoperative ERCP was performed using the rendezvous technique.
Results: There were 64 patients in the preoperative ERCP group and 59 patients in the intraoperative ERCP group. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar, except that the bilirubin and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels and the number of patients treated on an inpatient basis were higher in the preoperative ERCP group. Success rates were similar (96.6 % in the preoperative ERCP group vs. 90.2 % in the intraoperative ERCP group in the per-protocol study). Total morbidity, post-ERCP morbidity, and post-ERCP acute pancreatitis rates were higher in the preoperative ERCP group, but there were no differences between the two groups in the frequency of residual common bile duct stones, the conversion rate to open cholecystectomy, or surgical morbidity. The length of hospital stay and costs were lower in the intraoperative ERCP group despite the longer surgical times in this group. Univariate analysis did not find any relationship between morbidity and total bilirubin or GGT. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that morbidity was related only to the treatment group and the time spent in the operating room: the relative risk (RR) was 4.37 for morbidity and 1.015 for the time spent in the operating room); the RR for papillotomy was 5.49.
Conclusions: Both treatment approaches were equally effective but the intraoperative ERCP group had less morbidity, a shorter hospital stay, and reduced costs. The lower morbidity in the intraoperative ERCP group resulted from the lower rate of papillotomy and lower rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis and cholecystitis. Total morbidity was principally related to the type of treatment approach used.

References

• 1 Zacks S L, Sandler R S, Rutledge R, Brown R S Jr. A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 334-340
• 2 Varghese J C, Liddell R P, Farrell M A. et al . The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.  Clin Radiol. 1999;  54 604-614
• 3 Tham T C, Lichtenstein D R, Vandervoort J. et al . Role of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  47 50-56
• 4 Neuhaus H, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A. et al . Prospective evaluation of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Endoscopy. 1992;  24 745-749
• 5 Lilly M C, Arregui M E. A balanced approach to choledocholithiasis.  Surg Endosc. 2001;  15 467-472
• 6 Cuschieri A, Lezoche E, Morino M. et al . EAES multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs. single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi.  Surg Endosc. 1999;  13 952-957
• 7 Freeman M L, Nelson D B, Sherman S. et al . Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 909-918
• 8 Soltan H M, Kow L, Toouli J. A simple scoring system for predicting bile duct stones in patients with cholelithiasis.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2001;  5 434-437
• 9 Lezoche E, Paganini A M, Carlei F. et al . Laparoscopic treatment of gallbladder and common bile duct stones: a prospective study.  World J Surg. 1996;  20 535-542
• 10 Kozarek R A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: who does what, when and to whom?.  Endoscopy. 1992;  24 785-787
• 11 Tricarico A, Cione G, Sozio M. et al . Endolaparoscopic rendezvous treatment: a satisfying therapeutic choice for cholecystocholedocholithiasis.  Surg Endosc. 2002;  16 585-588
• 12 Deslandres E, Gagner M, Pomp A. et al . Intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;  39 54-58
• 13 Cavina E, Franceschi M, Sidoti F. et al . Laparo-endoscopic “rendezvous”: a new technique in the choledocholithiasis treatment.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;  45 1430-1435
• 14 Cemachovic I, Letard J C, Begin G F. et al . Intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy is a reasonable option for complete single-stage minimally invasive biliary stones treatment: short-term experience with 57 patients.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 956-962
• 15 Rhodes M, Sussman L, Cohen L, Lewis M P. Randomised trial of laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct versus postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for common bile duct stones.  Lancet. 1998;  351 159-161
• 16 Wright B E, Freeman M L, Cumming J K. et al . Current management of common bile duct stones: is there a role for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a single-stage procedure?.  Surgery. 2002;  132 729-737
• 17 Murray B, Carter R, Imrie C. et al . Diclofenac reduces the incidence of acute pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Gastroenterology. 2003;  124 1786-1791
• 18 Moreto M, Zaballa M, Casado I. et al . Transdermal glyceryl trinitrate for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a randomized double-blind trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 1-7
• 19 Arnold J C, Benz C, Martin W R. et al . Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation vs. sphincterotomy for removal of common bile duct stones: a prospective randomized pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 563-567
• 20 Siegel J H, Safrany L, Ben-Zvi J S. et al . Duodenoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladders in situ: report of a series of 1272 patients.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;  83 1255-1258
• 21 Cohen S, Bacon B R, Berlin J A. et al . National Institutes of Health State-of-the-Science Conference Statement: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy, January 14 - 16, 2002.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 803-809
• 22 Waye J D, Goh K L, Huibregtse K. et al . Endoscopic sphincterotomy: 2002.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 139-140