Semin Thromb Hemost 2006; 32(7): 673-677
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-951295
Copyright © 2006 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

The Value of Clinical Findings and D-Dimer Tests in Diagnosing Deep Vein Thrombosis in Primary Care

Ruud Oudega1 , Arno W. Hoes1 , Diane B. Toll1 , Karel G.M Moons1
  • 1Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 October 2006 (online)

ABSTRACT

In primary care, the physician has to decide which patients with a suspicion of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) have to be referred for further diagnostic work-up. Accurate referral is of utmost importance because unrecognized and therefore untreated DVT may cause pulmonary embolism. The classic clinical findings are not sufficiently accurate for the diagnosis of DVT. The majority of the referred patients, 70 to 80%, do not have DVT and this puts a burden on both patients and health care budgets. Diagnosis in primary care is different from that in secondary care caused by the referral mechanism or spectrum difference. Diagnostic tests derived in secondary care, therefore, cannot simply be generalized to primary-care patients. The well-known diagnostic rule for DVT, the Wells rule, does not adequately rule out DVT in primary-care patients. A proper diagnostic rule for use in primary care is lacking; therefore, we investigated the data of 1295 patients in primary care suspected of having DVT. We developed and validated a simple diagnostic decision rule to exclude the presence of DVT safely in primary care. Independent diagnostic indicators of the presence of DVT were male gender, oral contraceptive use, presence of malignancy, recent surgery, absence of leg trauma, vein distension, calf circumference difference, and D-dimer test result. Application of this rule could reduce the number of referrals by at least 23%, whereas only 0.7% of the patients with a DVT would not be referred. A diagnosis strategy is given, together with a practical flow diagram.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Cranley J J, Canos A J, Sull W J. The diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Fallibility of clinical symptoms and signs.  Arch Surg. 1976;  111 34-36
  • 2 Haeger K. Problems of acute deep venous thrombosis. I. The interpretation of signs and symptoms.  Angiology. 1969;  20 219-223
  • 3 Hirsh J, Hoak J. Management of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A statement for healthcare professionals. Council on Thrombosis (in consultation with the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology), American Heart Association.  Circulation. 1996;  93 2212-2245
  • 4 Wells P S, Anderson D R, Rodger M et al.. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  349 1227-1235
  • 5 Cornuz J, Ghali W A, Hayoz D, Stoianov R, Depairon M, Yersin B. Clinical prediction of deep venous thrombosis using two risk assessment methods in combination with rapid quantitative D-dimer testing.  Am J Med. 2002;  112 198-203
  • 6 Kraaijenhagen R A, Piovella F, Bernardi E et al.. Simplification of the diagnostic management of suspected deep vein thrombosis.  Arch Intern Med. 2002;  162 907-911
  • 7 Perrier A, Desmarais S, Miron M J et al.. Non-invasive diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in outpatients.  Lancet. 1999;  353 190-195
  • 8 Wells P S, Anderson D R, Bormanis J et al.. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management.  Lancet. 1997;  350 1795-1798
  • 9 Landefeld C S, McGuire E, Cohen A M. Clinical findings associated with acute proximal deep vein thrombosis: a basis for quantifying clinical judgment.  Am J Med. 1990;  88 382-388
  • 10 Constans J, Nelzy M L, Salmi L R et al.. Clinical prediction of lower limb deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic hospitalized patients.  Thromb Haemost. 2001;  86 985-990
  • 11 Goodacre S, Sutton A J, Sampson F C. Metaanalysis: the value of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.  Ann Intern Med. 2005;  143 129-139
  • 12 Oudega R, Moons K GM, Hoes A W. Ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care: a simple diagnostic algorithm including D-dimer testing.  Thromb Haemost. 2005;  94 200-205
  • 13 Schutgens R EG, Ackermark P, Haas F JLM et al.. Combination of a normal D-dimer concentration and a non-high pretest clinical probability score is a safe strategy to exclude deep venous thrombosis.  Circulation. 2003;  107 593-597
  • 14 Kearon C, Ginsberg J S, Douketis J et al.. Management of suspected deep venous thrombosis in outpatients by using clinical assessment and D-dimer testing.  Ann Intern Med. 2001;  135 108-111
  • 15 Anderson D R, Kovacs M J, Kovacs G et al.. Combined use of clinical assessment and D-dimer to improve the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected deep vein thrombosis (the EDITED Study).  J Thromb Haemost. 2003;  1 645-651
  • 16 Knottnerus J A. Between iatrotropic stimulus and interiatric referral: the domain of primary care research.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;  55 1201-1206
  • 17 Ransohoff D, Feinstein A R. Problems of spectrum and bias in evaluating the efficacy of diagnostic tests.  N Engl J Med. 1978;  299 926-930
  • 18 Knottnerus J A, Leffers P. The influence of referral patterns on the characteristics of diagnostic tests.  J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;  45 1143-1154
  • 19 Knottnerus J A, Muris J W. Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;  56 1118-1128
  • 20 van der Schouw Y T, van der Graaf Y, Steyerberg E W, Eijkemans J C, Banga J D. Age at menopause as a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality.  Lancet. 1996;  347 714-718
  • 21 Begg C B, Greenes R A. Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias.  Biometrics. 1983;  39 207-215
  • 22 Heim S W, Schectman J M, Siadaty M S, Philbrick J T. D-dimer testing for deep venous thrombosis: a metaanalysis.  Clin Chem. 2004;  50 1136-1147
  • 23 Keeling D M, Mackie I J, Moody A, Watson H G. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients and the potential for clinical assessment and D-dimer assays to reduce the need for diagnostic imaging.  Br J Haematol. 2004;  124 15-25
  • 24 Justice A C, Covinsky K E, Berlin J A. Assessing the generalizability of prognostic information.  Ann Intern Med. 1999;  130 515-524
  • 25 Moons K G, Biesheuvel C J, Grobbee D E. Test research versus diagnostic research.  Clin Chem. 2004;  50 473-476
  • 26 Stein P D, Hull R D, Patel K C et al.. D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review.  Ann Intern Med. 2004;  140 589-602
  • 27 Oudega R, Toll D B, Bulte R J, Hoes A W, Moons K GM. Different cut-off values for two D-dimer assays to exclude deep venous thrombosis in primary care.  Thromb Haemost. 2006;  95 744-746
  • 28 Michiels J J, Kasbergen H, Oudega R et al.. Exclusion and diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in outpatients by sequential noninvasive tools.  Int Angiol. 2002;  21 9-19
  • 29 Fancher T L, White R H, Kravitz R L. Combined use of rapid D-dimer testing and estimation of clinical probability in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: systematic review.  BMJ. 2004;  329 821
  • 30 Wells P S, Owen C, Doucette S, Fergusson D, Tran H. Does this patient have deep vein thrombosis?.  JAMA. 2006;  295 199-207
  • 31 Tamariz L J, Eng J, Segal J B et al.. Usefulness of clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review.  Am J Med. 2004;  117 676-684
  • 32 Oudega R, Hoes A W, Moons K GM. Wells rule does not adequately rule out deep vein thrombosis in primary care.  Ann Intern Med. 2005;  143 100-107
  • 33 Oudega R, Moons K GM, Hoes A W. Limited value of patient history and physical examination in diagnosing deep vein thrombosis in primary care.  Fam Pract. 2005;  22 86-91
  • 34 Laupacis A, Sekar N, Stiell I G. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards.  JAMA. 1997;  277 488-494
  • 35 Wasson J H, Sox H C, Neff R K, Goldman L. Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards.  N Engl J Med. 1985;  313 793-799
  • 36 Moons K GM, Grobbee D E. Diagnostic studies as multivariable, prediction research.  J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002;  56 337-338

 Dr.
Ruud Oudega

Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center

P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands

Email: R.Oudega@knmg.nl

    >