Efficacy of Instability Resistance Training

Abstract

The use of the stability ball as a platform for upper-body resistance training has gained much attention in recent years. However, the efficacy of such training regimens remains largely unstudied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of platform (unstable vs. stable, stability ball vs. flat bench) on strength and work capacity during barbell chest-press exercise. We also sought to determine the effects of a barbell chest-press training program performed on a stability ball or flat bench on strength, work capacity, and abdominal power. Fourteen young women (20 - 23 yr) performed a 1 repetition maximum (1RM) barbell chest-press and the YMCA bench press test (YBT) on a stability ball and flat bench, as well as two field tests measuring abdominal power. The women were then assigned to perform 3 weeks of barbell chest-press training on a stability ball (SB group) or flat bench (FB group); assignment was balanced based on 1RM strength. Barbell chest-press training included 3 sets of 3 - 5 repetitions at loads greater or equal to 85 % of 1RM. The 1RM barbell chest-press, YBT, front abdominal power test (FAPT), and side abdominal power test (SAPT) were used to evaluate changes in strength, work capacity, and abdominal power, respectively. The chest-press tests were completed on both platforms following the training program. Platform (stability ball vs. flat bench) had no influence on strength, but work capacity was initially 12 % lower on the stability ball compared to the flat bench. In response to training, both groups significantly increased strength and work capacity, and there were no group differences. The increase in 1RM strength was 15 % and 16 % on the stability ball and flat bench for the SB group, and 16 % and 19 % for the FB group, respectively. The increase in work capacity was 32 % and 13 % on the stability ball and flat bench for the SB group, and 27 % and 26 % for the FB group, respectively. Both groups significantly improved on the FAPT, and there were no group differences. Performance on the FAPT improved by 5 % for the SB group, and 22 % for the FB group. Performance on the SAPT did not change. Barbell chest-press training performed on either the stability ball or flat bench increased strength and work capacity, and these changes were transferable across platforms. Thus, the stability ball is an effective platform for barbell chest-press training in untrained women over a short duration.

Key words

core function - stability ball - strength - work capacity - chest‐press

References

• 1 Aagaard P. Training-induced changes in neural function.  Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2003;  31 61-67
• 2 Abe T, DeHoyes D V, Pollock M L, Garzarella L. Time course for strength and muscle thickness changes following upper and lower body resistance training in men and women.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2000;  81 174-180
• 3 Akuthota V, Nadler S F. Core strengthening.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;  85 S86-S92
• 4 Almasbakk B, Hoff J. Coordination, the determinant of velocity specificity?.  J Appl Physiol. 1996;  80 2046-2052
• 5 American College of Sports Medicine . Position stand: progression models in resistance training for healthy adults.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;  34 364-380
• 6 Anderson K G, Behm D G. The impact of instability resistance training on balance and stability.  Sports Med. 2005;  35 43-53
• 7 Anderson K G, Behm D G. Maintenance of EMG activity and loss of force output with instability.  J Strength Cond Res. 2004;  18 637-640
• 8 Atkinson G, Nevill A M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.  Sports Med. 1998;  26 217-238
• 9 Baechle T R, Earle R W. (eds) .Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics 2000
• 10 Baker D, Wilson G, Carlyon B. Generality versus specificity: a comparison of dynamic and isometric measures of strength and speed-strength.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1994;  68 350-355
• 11 Baumgarter T A. Norm-referenced measurement: reliability. Safrit MJ, Wood TM Measurement Concepts in Physical Education and Exercise Science. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics 1989: 45-72
• 12 Behm D G, Anderson K G, Curnew R S. Muscle force and activation under stable and unstable conditions.  J Strength Cond Res. 2002;  16 416-422
• 13 Behm D G, Leonard A M, Young W B, Bonsey W AC, MacKinnon S N. Trunk muscle electromyographic activity with unstable and unilateral exercises.  J Strength Cond Res. 2005;  19 193-201
• 14 Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.  Lancet. 1986;  1 307-310
• 15 Brown L E, Weir J P. ASEP procedures recommendation I: accurate assessment of muscular strength and power.  J Exer Physiol-online. 2001;  4 1-21
• 16 Carter J M, Beam W C, McMahan S G, Barr M L, Brown L E. The effects of stability ball training on spinal stability in sedentary individuals.  J Strength Cond Res. 2006;  20 429-435
• 17 Chilibeck P D, Calder A W, Sale D G, Webber C E. A comparison of strength and muscle mass increases during resistance training in young women.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1998;  77 170-175
• 18 Chu D. Plyometric Exercises with the Medicine Ball. Livermore, CA, USA; Bittersweet Publishing Company 1989
• 19 Cosio-Lima L M, Reynolds K L, Winter C, Paolone V, Jones M T. Effects of physioball and conventional floor exercises on early phase adaptations in back and abdominal core stability and balance in women.  J Strength Cond Res. 2003;  17 721-725
• 20 Cronin J B, Henderson M E. Maximal strength and power assessment in novice weight trainers.  J Strength Cond Res. 2004;  18 48-52
• 21 Fleck S J, Kraemer W J. Designing Resistance Training Programs. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics Books 1987
• 22 Franklin B A, Whaley M H, Howley E T. (eds) .ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2000
• 23 Golding (ed) L A. YMCA Fitness Testing and Assessment Manual. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics 2000
• 24 Leetun D T, Lloyd-Ireland M, Willson J D, Ballantyne B T, McClay-Davis I. Core stability measures as risk factors for lower extremity injury in athletes.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;  36 926-934
• 25 Lehman G L, Gordon T, Langley J, Pemrose P, Tregaskis S. Replacing a swiss ball for an exercise bench causes variable changes in trunk muscle activity during upper limb strength exercises.  Dyn Med. 2005;  4
• 26 Liemohn W P, Baumgartner T A, Gagnon L H. Measuring core stability.  J Strength Cond Res. 2005;  19 583-586
• 27 Mortitani T, DeVries H A. Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain.  Am J Phys Med. 1979;  58 115-130
• 28 Murphy A J, Wilson G J. Poor correlations between isometric tests and dynamic performance: relationship to muscle activation.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1996;  74 353-357
• 29 Rutherford O M, Jones D A. The role of learning and coordination in strength training.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1986;  55 100-105
• 30 Sale D G. Neural adaptation to resistance training.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988;  20 S135-145
• 31 Stanforth D, Stanforth P R, Hahn S R, Phillips A. A 10-week training study comparing resistaball and traditional trunk training.  J Dance Med Sci. 1998;  2 134-140
• 32 Stanton R, Reaburn P R, Humphries B. The effect of short-term swiss ball training on core stability and running economy.  J Strength Cond Res. 2004;  18 522-528
• 33 Tanaka H, Swensen T. The effect of resistance training on endurance performance: a new form of cross-training?.  Sports Med. 1998;  25 191-200
• 34 Vera-Garcia F J, Grenier S G, McGill S M. Abdominal muscle response during curl-ups on both stable and labile surfaces.  Phys Ther. 2000;  80 564-569
• 35 Willardson J M. The effectiveness of resistance exercises performed on unstable equipment.  Strength Cond J. 2005;  26 70-74
• 36 Willson J D, Dougherty C P, Ireland M, Davis I. Core stability and its relationship to lower extremity function and injury.  J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2005;  13 316-325