Download PDF
Endoscopy 2007; 39(11): 974-977
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966926
DDW Highlights

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of gastric tumors

L.  Aabakken1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 October 2007 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Introduction

The role of endoscopy in the handling of benign and malignant gastrointestinal tumors continues to expand, due to a combination of increasing sophistication of the equipment and ingenious improvements in the methods used. Traditional white-light surface imaging is increasingly being supplemented by other modalities, and the removal of lesions now carries a strong resemblance to minimally invasive surgery. Summarizing the abstracts from this year’s Digestive Disease Week on the endoscopic handling of gastrointestinal tumors is a vast task because this now comprises the bulk of endoscopic activity. The following summary will concentrate on methods and results related to the handling of gastric lesions.

References

  • 1 Oyama T, Tomori A, Hotta K. Efficacy of NBI system for the diagnosis of the lateral extension of superficial gastric cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kawahara Y, Takenaka R, Okada H. Usefulness of hi-vision endoscopy and acetic acid-indigocarmine mixture (AIM) for the diagnosis of early gastric cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB350
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mizuno H, Yahagi N. A new method to diagnose early gastric cancer: ”acetic acid-indigo carmine method”.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB338
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wada Y, Inoue H, Wakamura K. et al . Differential diagnostic criteria for neoplastic lesions in the stomach by a NBI-enhanced magnifying endoscope ”APC score”.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Ng E K, Leung W K, Chiu P W. et al . Potential role of narrow-band imaging (NBI) and magnifying endoscopy in the diagnosis and surveillance of intestinal metaplasia of the stomach.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB159
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Muguruma N, Kimura T, Takeuchi H. et al . Usefulness of infrared fluorescence endoscopy for the diagnosis of superficial gastric tumors.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB350
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bhunchet E. Fluorescence electronic endoscopy by fluorescein might be the only way to detect and determine the extent of intramucosal un-differentiated gastric cancers covered with normal epithelium: a pilot study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB339
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Imaeda H, Kashiwagi K, Hosoe N. et al . A novel autofluorescence video endoscopy system (SAFE-3000) for diagnosis of gastric and esophageal neoplasms.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB337
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ghassemi K A, Said J W, Farrell J J, Weinstein W M. Gastric MALT lymphoma is a histologically pan-gastric disease independent of dominant endoscopic findings.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cho S-J, Kim S G, Lee J Y. et al . The efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasm using insulated-tipped diathermic knife.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB273
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Choi J W, Park Y S, Kim K H. et al . The clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the treatment of malignant gastric neoplasm.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB181
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nakagawa M, Kato M, Ono S. et al . Safeness and usefulness of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus conventional EMR for superficial gastric lesions.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB181
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ishii N, Horiki N, Itoh T. et al . Strategy of endoscopic treatment for early gastric cancer in a primary hospital.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Shimura T, Yamada T, Sasaki M. et al . Advantages of endoscopic submucosal dissection over conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for intramucosal gastric neoplasms.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kim W J, Cho J Y, Choi I S. et al . The result of endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumors over 15 years.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB97
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Deprez P H, Aouattah T, Yeung C-P. et al . Endoscopic resection of upper GI superficial tumors: complications, management and outcome.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB366
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Probst A, Arnholdt A, Anthuber M, Messmann H. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of large mucosal and submucosal lesions in the GI tract: experience in the Western world.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB278
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Deprez P H, Aouattah T, Yeung C-P. et al . Endoscopic resection of superficial gastric tumors.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hondo F Y, Maluf-Filho F, Kishi H. et al . Predictive factors for local recurrence and incomplete resection of early gastric cancer treated by endoscopic resection in a Western tertiary referral center.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB282
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Rodriguez S, Faigel D O. Submucosal lesions of the upper GI tract: remove or leave alone?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB207
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lenz L, DiSena V, Thuler F. et al . Comparative performance of submucosal fluid injection with hydroxypropyl methylcellulose 0.25 %, carboxymethylcellulose 0.5 % and normal saline solution in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bacani C J, Woodward T A, Raimondo M. et al . Efficacy and safety of endoscopic mucosal resection with hydroxyl-propyl-methyl-cellulose compared to normal saline.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB284
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kaehler G F, Sold M G, Grobholz R, Post S. Submucosal cushioning with waterjet before endoscopic mucosal resection: which substances are effective?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB277
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kaehler G F, Collet P H, Sold M G, Post S. Waterjet for mucosal elevation in the GI tract: first clinical experiences.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB288
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Kurosawa A, Kawakubo Y, Nagahara A. et al . The use of 2TQ260M endoscope with bipolar needle knife (B-knife) and insulation-tipped knife (IT-knife) could facilitate endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) procedure.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB281
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sakurazawa N, Yamashita N, Hagiwara N. et al . A novel device, the anglerfish type of counter tractor, is easy and safe to use in patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB278
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Nishiwaki S, Araki H, Kawaguchi J. et al . Transgastrostomic endoscopy-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric tumors in patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB161
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Min B-H, Lee J H, Kim Y-H. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric gancer: comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection with circumferential precutting (EMR-P).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kim J, Park D H, Kim M Y. et al . Clinical efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection with snare polypectomy (partial ESD) in gastric neoplasms.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB317
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

L. Aabakken, MD

Department of Gastroenterology

Rikshospitalet University Hospital

N-0027 Oslo

Norway

Fax: +47-2307-2008

Email: larsaa@medisin.uio.no

      >