Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2007; 23(2): 091-099
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-979277
Copyright © 2007 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Two-Stage Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair

Sherard A. Tatum1
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
21 May 2007 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Reconstruction of the unilateral cleft lip deformity remains a challenge. The Millard repair is the most commonly employed technique of lip closure. Wide clefts with malaligned alveolar arches and very short cleft-side philtral ridges are particularly difficult to reconstruct well. These cases frequently require some degree of cleft-side alotomy with attendant scarring and potential growth disturbance. Additionally, the lip scar tends to cross the philtrum at an aesthetically unsatisfactory low level. Nasoalveolar molding is one method to address these problems, but is not always available or practical. Alternatively, a two-stage lip repair serves as a reasonable means of managing these problems as well. The first stage, performed at approximately 4 to 6 weeks of age, is a full-thickness straight-line repair with tip rhinoplasty. The second stage is a modified Millard repair done at approximately 6 months of age. An alotomy is never needed. The lip scar does not cross the philtrum until the nasolabial crease. The alveolar segments are passively brought closer together by the early lip repair facilitating anterior palate closure. This technique has been used for more than 10 years with satisfying aesthetic and functional results.

KEYWORDS

Cleft - cleft lip - cleft lip and palate - cleft lip repair

REFERENCES

  • 1 Davies D. Cleft lip repair. Fifth World Congress of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. London, UK; Butterworths 1971: 169-173
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Noordhoff M, Chen Y, Chen K, Hong K, Lo L. The surgical technique for the complete unilateral cleft lip-nasal deformity.  Oper Tech in Plast Recon Surg. 1995;  2 167-174
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bennun R D, Figueroa A A. Dynamic presurgical nasal remodeling in patients with unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate: modification to the original technique.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;  43 639-648
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pai B C, Ko E W, Huang C S, Liou E J. Symmetry of the nose after presurgical nasoalveolar molding in infants with unilateral cleft lip and palate: a preliminary study.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;  42 658-663
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Talmant J C. Nasal malformation associated with unilateral cleft lip.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1993;  27 183-191
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Schendel S A, Pearl R M, De'Armond S J. Pathophysiology of cleft lip muscles following the initial surgical repair.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;  88 197-200
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Still J M, Georgiade N G. Historical review of management of cleft lip and palate. In: Georgiade NG Symposium on Management of Cleft Lip and Palate and Associated Deformities. St. Louis, MO; Mosby 1974: 13-21
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Rose W. Harelip and Cleft Palate. London, UK; HK Lewis 1891
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Thompson J E. An artistic and mathematically accurate method of repairing the defect in cases of harelip.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1912;  14 498-505
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Randall P. A lip adhesion operation in cleft lip surgery.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;  35 371-376
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Vander Woude D L, Mulliken J B. Effect of lip adhesion on labial height in two-stage repair of unilateral complete cleft lip.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;  100 567-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Furnas D W. Straight-line closure: a preliminary to Millard closure in unilateral cleft lips (with a history of the straight-line closure, including the Mirault misunderstanding).  Clin Plast Surg. 1984;  11 701-737
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Verwoerd C D, Mladina R, Nolst Trenite G J, Pigott R W. The nose in children with unilateral cleft lip and palate.  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1995;  32(suppl) S45-S52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Nakajima T, Yoshimura Y. Early repair of unilateral cleft lip employing a small triangular flap method and primary nasal correction.  Br J Plast Surg. 1993;  46 616-618
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Stephens P, Saunders P, Bingham R. Neonatal cleft lip repair: a retrospective review of anaesthetic complications.  Paediatr Anaesth. 1997;  7 33-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Semb G, Brattstrom V, Molsted K, Prahl-Andersen B, Shaw W C. The Eurocleft Study: intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Part 1: Introduction and treatment experience.  Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;  42 64-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kramer G J, Hoeksman J B, Prahl-Andersen B. Early palatal changes in complete and incomplete cleft lip and/or palate.  Acta Anat (Basel). 1992;  144 202-212
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Henkel K O, Gundlach K K. Analysis of primary gingivoperiosteoplaty in alveolar cleft repair. Part I: Facial growth.  J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1997;  25 266-269
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gnoinski W M. Early maxillary orthopaedics as a supplement to conventional primary surgery in complete cleft lip and palate cases: Long-term results.  J Maxillofac Surg. 1982;  10 165-172
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Sherard A TatumM.D. F.A.A.P. F.A.C.S. 

Departments of Otolaryngology and Pediatrics Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

750 East Adams Street, CWB Rm 241 Syracuse, NY 13210

      >