Painless Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose at Finger Sites

Abstract

Introduction: Skin punctures at alternative sites can reduce the pain associated with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). However, delays in detection of blood glucose at alternative sites during rapid systemic blood glucose change have been reported. Accordingly, we developed a novel method of finger pricking and tested it to see if it would both reduce or eliminate pain and accurately reflect systemic glucose levels, even during rapid changes.

Methods: Each of 35 healthy volunteers (10 females and 25 males; mean age 36.6 years, range 18-82 years) received 5 serial punctures from a lancet device on randomly selected fingers. The puncture target was the dorsal side of the finger between the nail and the distal finger joint. We used a lancet device designed for accurate punctures of 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5 and 0.6 mm depths. Immediately afterward, as a control, a conventional fingertip puncture was done on the front of a 6th finger. After each puncture, subjects were asked whether or not they felt pain.

Results: Following punctures at depths of 0.2 mm and 0.3 mm, respectively, 31 of 35 subjects (89%) and 33 of 35 subjects (94%) felt no pain. Following conventional punctures, all 35 subjects (100%) felt pain. Blood sample volumes≥2μL were obtained in all cases except for two punctures at 0.2 mm depth. Blood glucose levels did not differ with differing puncture sites, (conventional fingertip sites vs. alternative sites used in this study).

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that 0.2 and 0.3 mm punctures at our alternative finger site - the dorsal side of the finger between the nail and the distal finger joint - can provide blood samples sufficient for SMBG, substantially redu-ces the proportion of subjects who experience pain, and accurately reflects systemic glucose levels.

Key words

finger back - painless puncture - self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG)

References

• 1 Benfeldt E. In vivo microdialysis for the investigation of drug levels in the dermis and the effect of barrier perturbation on cutaneous drug penetration - Studies in hairless rats and human subjects - Preface.  Acta Derm Venereol. 1999;  206 ((Suppl)) 3-59
• 2 Cull P. (Ed). The Sourcebook of Medical Illustration. Park Ridge, USA: Parthenon Publishing Group, Inc. 1989: 270
• 3 Ellison JM, Stegmann JM, Colner SL, Michael RH, Sharma MK, Ervin KR, Horwitz DL. Rapid changes in postprandial blood glucose produce concentration differences at finger, forearm, and thigh sampling sites.  Diabetes Care. 2002;  25 961-964
• 4 Fawcett DW. A textbook of histology. 11th edn. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co 1986: 543-578
• 5 Fineberg SE, Bergenstal RM, Bernstein RM, Laffel LM, Schwartz SL. Use of an automated device for alternative site blood glucose monitoring.  Diabetes Care. 2001;  24 1217-1220
• 6 Fruhstorfer H, Müller T, Scheer E. Capillary blood sampling: how much pain is necessary? Part 2: Relation between penetration depth and puncture pain.  Practical Diabetes International. 1995;  12 184-185
• 7 Griffin JW, MacArthur JC, Polydefkis M. Assessment of cutaneous innervation by skin biopsies.  Curr Opin Neurol. 2001;  14 655-659
• 8 Jungheim K, Koschinsky T. Glucose monitoring at the arm - Risky delays of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia detection.  Diabetes Care. 2002;  25 956-960
• 9 Kudo K. Illustrated Phlebotomy Procedure. Tokyo, Japan: Shizensha 1983: 67-75

Correspondence