Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24(1): 135-145
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1037455
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Advances in Cranioplasty: A Simplified Algorithm to Guide Cranial Reconstruction of Acquired Defects

Monica Tadros1 , 2 , Peter D. Costantino1 , 2 , 3
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York
  • 2The Center for Facial Reconstruction & Restoration, New York, New York
  • 3The Center for Cranial Base Surgery, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, New York, New York
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 February 2008 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The search for a universal reconstructive material and the application of a routine approach leaves the surgeon limited in cranial reconstruction. Facility with a variety of implant materials and approaches helps optimize surgical management. The variability of surgical defects and challenges in cranial reconstruction highlights the importance of a strategic approach to evaluate both the defect and the clinical circumstance. Among the numerous alloplastic materials available, the utility of titanium mesh, hydroxyapatite cement, and prefabricated custom acrylic implants have remained at the forefront. The onus of responsibility remains on the surgeon to evaluate each clinical scenario and select the optimal course for management.

KEYWORDS

Cranioplasty - alloplast - cranial reconstruction - hydroxyapatite cement - acrylic

REFERENCES

  • 1 Taub P J, Rudkin G H, Clearihue W J et al.. Prefebricated alloplastic implants for cranial defects.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;  111 1233-1240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Jones C, Rogers S. Combined use of titanium mesh and biocompatible osteoconductive polymer in the treatment of full thickness calvarial defects.  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;  36 143-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Malis L I. Titanium mesh and acrylic cranioplasty.  Neurosurgery. 1989;  25 351-355
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Simpson D. Titanium in cranioplasty.  J Neurosurg. 1965;  22 292-293
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gladstone H B, McDermott M W, Cooke D D. Implants for cranioplasty.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1995;  28 381-399
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Toth B A, Ellis D S, Stewart W B. Computer designed prostheses for orbitocranial reconstruction.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;  81 315-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Agner C, Dujovny M, Park H. Delayed minimally invasive cranioplasty.  Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2003;  46 186-190
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fallahi B, Foroutan M, Mottavalli S et al.. Computer-aided manufacturing of implants for the repair of large cranial defects: an improvement of the stereolithography technique.  Neurol Res. 1999;  21 281-286
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wazen J, Sisti M, Lam S. Cranioplasty in acoustic neuroma surgery.  Laryngoscope. 2000;  110 1294-1297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Yamaura A, Makino H. Neurological deficits in the presence of sinking skin flap following decompressive craniectomy.  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1977;  17 43-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Costantino P D, Friedman C D, Jones K et al.. Hydroxyapatite cement.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;  117 379-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chim H, Schantz J. New frontiers in calvarial reconstruction: integrating computer-assisted design and tissue engineering in cranioplasty.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;  116 1726-1741
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Van Gool A V. Preformed polymethylmethacrylate cranioplasties: report of 45 cases.  J Maxillofac Surg. 1985;  13 2-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dean D, Topham N S, Rimnac C et al.. Osseointegration of preformed polymethylmethacrylate craniofacial prosthesis coated with bone marrow-impregnated polyDL-LGA foam.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;  104 705-712
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Isaksson S, Alberius P, Klinge B et al.. Regenerative response to membranous and endochondral lyophilized allogeneic bone in rabbit skull defects.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1979;  63 626-633
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rahn B A. Direct and indirect bone healing after operative fracture treatment.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1987;  20 425-440
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Costantino P D, Hiltzik D, Govindaraj S et al.. Bone healing and bone substitutes.  Facial Plast Surg. 2002;  18 13-26
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Friedman C D, Costantino P D, Snyderman C H et al.. Reconstruction of the frontal sinus and frontofacial skeleton with hydroxyapatite cement.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000;  2 124-129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Groth M J, Bhatnagar A, Clearihue W J et al.. Long-term efficacy of biomodeled polymethyl methacrylate implants for orbitofacial defects.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006;  8 381-389
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Berghaus A, Mulch G, Handrock M. Porous polyethylene and proplast: their behavior in a bony implant bed.  Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1984;  240 115-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Smith S C, Pelofsky S. Adaptation of rigid fixation to cranial flap replacement.  Neurosurgery. 1991;  29 417-418
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ellerbe D M, Frodel J L. Comparison of implant materials used in maxillofacial rigid internal fixation.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1995;  28 365-372
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Verret D J, Ducic Y, Oxford L et al.. Hydroxyapatite cement in craniofacial reconstruction.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;  133 897-899
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Reddi A H, Muthukumaran N, Ma S et al.. Initiation of bone development by osteogenin and promotion by growth factors.  Connect Tissue Res. 1989;  20 303-312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Costantino P D, Chaplin J M, Wolpoe M et al.. Applications of fast-setting hydroxyapatite cement: Cranioplasty.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;  123 409-412
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Turk J B, Parhiscar A. BoneSource for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.  Facial Plast Surg. 2000;  16 7-14
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Yamamoto Y, Mendel E, Raffel C. Acrylic cranioplasty with alginate molding: technical note.  Neurosurgery. 1997;  41 305-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Laedrach K, Lukes A, Raveh J. Reconstruction of skull base and fronto-orbital defects following tumor resection.  Skull Base. 2007;  17 59-72
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lykins C L, Friedman C D, Costantino P D et al.. Hydroxyapatite cement in craniofacial skeletal reconstruction and its effects on the developing craniofacial skeleton.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;  124 153-159
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Monica TadrosM.D. 

Assistant Professor of Clinical Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Director of Facial Plastic Surgery Education

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Columbia University, College of Physicians & Surgeons, 180 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032

      >