Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2007; 46(04): 476-483
DOI: 10.1160/ME9057
 
Schattauer GmbH

Towards New Scopes: Sensor-enhanced Regional Health Information Systems

Part 1: Architectural Challenges
O. J. Bott
1   Institute for Medical Informatics, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
,
M. Marschollek
1   Institute for Medical Informatics, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
,
K.-H. Wolf
1   Institute for Medical Informatics, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
,
R. Haux
1   Institute for Medical Informatics, Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: To analyze utilization of sensor technology in telemonitoring and home care and to discuss concepts and challenges of sensor-enhanced regional health information systems (rHIS).

Methods: The study is based upon experience in sensor-based telemedicine and rHIS projects, and on an analysis of HIS-related journal publications from 2003 to 2005 conducted in the context of publishing the IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

Results: Health-related parameters that are subject to sensor-based measurement in home care and tele-monitoring are identified. Publications related to tele-monitoring, home care and smart houses are analyzed concerning scope and utilization of sensor technology. Current approaches for integrating sensor technology in rHIS based on a corresponding eHealth infrastructure are identified. Based on a coarse architecture of home care and telemonitoring systems ten challenges for sensor-enhanced rHIS are identified and discussed: integration of home and health telematic platforms towards a sensor-enhanced telematic platform, transmission rate guarantees, ad hoc connectivity, cascading data analysis, remote configuration, message and alert logistic, sophisticated user interfaces, unobtrusiveness, data safety and security, and electronic health record integration.

Conclusions: Utilization of sensor technology in health care is an active field of research. Currently few research projects and standardization initiatives focus on general architectural considerations towards suitable telematic platforms for establishing sensor-enhanced rHIS. Further research finalized by corresponding standardization is needed. Part 2 of this paperwill present experiences with a research prototype for a sensor-enhanced rHIS telematic platform.

Keywords

Regional health information systems - ubiquitous computing - sensor systems - shared care - telemonitoring - home care
 

  • References

  • 1 UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division. World population to 2300. New York: United Nations; 2004.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Population Division. Population aging 2006. 2006 (cited 16.09.2006); Available from: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/ageing/ageing2006chart.pdf.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Haux R. Individualization, globalization and health – about sustainable information technologies and the aim of medical informatics. Int J Med Inform. 2006
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Haux R, Kulikowski C. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2005 – Special Topic: Ubiquitous Health Care Systems. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2005.
  • 5 Kuhn KA, Wurst SH, Bott OJ, Giuse DA. Expanding the scope of health information systems. Challenges and developments. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 43-52.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Haux R. Health information systems – past, present, future. Int J Med Inform 2006; 75 3-4 268-281.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bott OJ, Bergmann J, Hoffmann I, Vering T, Gomez EJ, Hernando ME. et al. Analysis and Specification of Telemedical Systems Using Modelling and Simulation: the MOSAIK-M Approach. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 116: 503-508.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bergmann J, Bott OJ, Pretschner DP, Haux R. An e-consent-based shared EHR system architecture for integrated healthcare networks. Int J Med Inform. 2006
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Marschollek M, Ludwig W, Schapiewski I, Schriever E, Schubert R, Dybowski H. et al. Multimodal home monitoring of elderly people – first results from the LASS study. IEEE First International Workshop on Smart Homes for Tele-Health (SmarTel07); 2007. Niagara Falls, Canada: (May21-23) IEEE; 2007.
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Marschollek M, Wolf K, Plischke M, Haux R. Classification of activities of daily life from long-term realistic multi-sensor data. IEEE Health Pervasive Systems (HPS06); 2006. Lyon, France: IEEE; 2006: 30-34.
    Google Scholar
  • 11 van Bemmel JH, McCray AT. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics. Stuttgart: Schattauer; Annual appearance since 1992. Editors since 2001. Haux R, Kulikowski CA.
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Bott OJ, Ammenwerth E, Brigl B, Knaup P, Lang E, Pilgram R. et al. The challenge of ubiquitous computing in health care: technology, concepts and solutions. Findings from the IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2005. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (03) 473-479.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Knaup P, Ammenwerth E, Brandner R, Brigl B, Fischer G, Garde S. et al. Towards clinical bioin-formatics: advancing genomic medicine with informatics methods and tools. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43 (03) 302-307.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ammenwerth E, Wolff AC, Knaup P, Ulmer H, Skonetzki S, van Bemmel JH. et al. Developing and evaluating criteria to help reviewers of biomedical informatics manuscripts. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10 (05) 512-514.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kulikowski C, Haux R. Assessing Information Technologies for Health. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 2-4.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Öberg PA, Togawa T, Spelman FA. Sensors in Medicine and Health Care. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2004.
  • 17 Celler BG, Lovell NH, Basilakis J. Using information technology to improve the management of chronic disease. Med J Aust 2003; 179 (05) 242-246.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Anliker U, Ward JA, Lukowicz P, Troster G, Dolveck F, Baer M. et al. AMON: a wearable multiparameter medical monitoring and alert system. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2004; 08 (04) 415-427.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Salvador CH, Pascual Carrasco M, Gonzalez de Mingo MA, Munoz Carrero A, Marquez Montes J, Sosa Martin L. et al. Airmed-cardio: a GSM and Internet services-based system for out-of-hospital follow-up of cardiac patients. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2005; 09 (01) 73-85.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Yoo SK, Kim KM, Jung SM, Kim NH, Kim SH, Park JB. et al. Real-time emergency telemedicine system: prototype design and functional evaluation. Yonsei Med J 2004; 45 (03) 501-509.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Chan DS, Callahan CW, Sheets SJ, Moreno CN, Malone FJ. An Internet-based store-and-forward video home telehealth system for improving asthma outcomes in children. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2003; 60 (19) 1976-1781.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Tura A, Badanai M, Longo D, Quareni L. Amulti-functional, portable device with wireless transmission for home monitoring of children with a learning disability. J Telemed Telecare 2004; 10 (05) 298-302.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Maiolo C, Mohamed EI, Fiorani CM, De Lorenzo A. Home telemonitoring for patients with severe respiratory illness: the Italian experience. J Telemed Telecare 2003; 09 (02) 67-71.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Mathie MJ, Coster AC, Lovell NH, Celler BG, Lord SR, Tiedemann A. Apilot study of long-term monitoring of human movements in the home using accelerometry. J Telemed Telecare 2004; 10 (03) 144-151.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Perry M, Dowdall A, Lines L, Hone K. Multimodal and ubiquitous computing systems: supporting independent-living older users. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2004; 08 (03) 258-270.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Mihailidis A, Carmichael B, Boger J. The use of computer vision in an intelligent environment to support aging-in-place, safety, and independence in the home. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2004; 08 (03) 238-247.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 van den Brink JL, Moorman PW, de Boer MF, van Bemmel JH, Pruyn JF, Verwoerd CD. An information system to support the care for head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2003; 11 (07) 452-459.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Enseleit F, Duru F. Long-termcontinuous external electrocardiographic recording: a review. Europace 2006; 08 (04) 255-266.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Cleland JG, Louis AA, Rigby AS, Janssens U, Balk AH. Noninvasive home telemonitoring for patients with heart failure at high risk of recurrent admission and death: the Trans-European Network-Home-Care Management System (TEN-HMS) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45 (10) 1654-1664.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Karantonis DM, Narayanan MR, Mathie M, Lovell NH, Celler BG. Implementation of a real-time human movement classifier using a triaxial accelerometer for ambulatory monitoring. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2006; 10 (01) 156-167.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Mathie MJ, Coster AC, Lovell NH, Celler BG. Accelerometry: providing an integrated, practical method for long-term, ambulatory monitoring of human movement. Physiol Meas 2004; 25 (02) R1-20.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lukowicz P, Kirstein T, Tröster G. Wearable systems for health care applications. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43 (03) 232-238.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Tröster G, Kirstein T, Lukowicz P. Motion aware clothing for the personal health assistant. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 117: 63-71.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Amft O, Tröster G. Methods for Detection and Classification of Normal Swallowing from Muscle Activation and Sound. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare; 2006. Innsbruck: Springer; 2006.
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Giorgino T, Azzini I, Rognoni C, Quaglini S, Stefanelli M, Gretter R. et al. Automated spoken dialogue system for hypertensive patient home management. Int J Med Inform 2005; 74 2-4 159-167.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kosaka R, Sankai Y, Takiya R, Jikuya T, Yamane T, Tsutsui T. Tsukuba remote monitoring system for continuous-flow artificial heart. Artif Organs 2003; 27 (10) 897-906.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Ferrer-Roca O, Cardenas A, Diaz-Cardama A, Pulido P. Mobile phone text messaging in the management of diabetes. J Telemed Telecare 2004; 10 (05) 282-285.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Bellazzi R, Arcelloni M, Ferrari P, Decata P, Hernando ME, Garcia A. et al. Management of patients with diabetes through information technology: tools for monitoring and control of the patients’ metabolic behavior. Diabetes Technol Ther 2004; 06 (05) 567-578.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Begg A, Drummond G, Tiplady B. Assessment of postsurgical recovery after discharge using a pen computer diary. Anaesthesia 2003; 58 (11) 1101-1105.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Braun RP, Vecchietti JL, Thomas L, Prins C, French LE, Gewirtzman AJ. et al. Telemedical wound care using anew generation of mobile telephones: a feasibility study. Arch Dermatol 2005; 141 (02) 254-258.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Marks IM, Mataix-Cols D, Kenwright M, Cameron R, Hirsch S, Gega L. Pragmatic evaluation of computer-aided self-help for anxiety and depression. Br JPsychiatry 2003; 183: 57-65.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Stefanov DH, Bien Z, Bang WC. The smart house for older persons and persons with physical disabilities: structure, technology arrangements, and perspectives. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2004; 12 (02) 228-250.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Hoffmann T, Russell T, McKenna K. Producing computer-generated tailored written information for stroke patients and their carers: system development and preliminary evaluation. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73 11-12 751-758.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Wright P. Criteria and ingredients for successful patient information. J Audiov Media Med 2003; 26 (01) 6-10.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Liederman EM, Morefield CS. Web messaging: a new tool for patient-physician communication. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10 (03) 260-270.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Roback K, Herzog A. Home informatics in healthcare: assessment guidelines to keep up quality of care and avoid adverse effects. Technol Health Care 2003; 11 (03) 195-206.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Mille SS. A new research challenge: persuasive technology to motivate healthy aging. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2004; 08 (03) 235-237.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Chen D, Soong SJ, Grimes GJ, Orthner HF. Wireless local area network in a prehospital environment. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2004; 04: 12.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Winter A, Brigl B, Wendt T. Modeling hospital information systems. Part 1: The revised three-layer graph-based meta model 3LGM2. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (05) 544-551.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Boniface M, Wilken P. ARTEMIS: towards a secure interoperability infrastructure for healthcare information systems. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 112: 181-189.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Katehakis DG. The PICNIC Story. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 115: 4-36.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Blobel B, Pharow P. A model driven approach for the German health telematics architectural framework and security infrastructure. Int J Med Inform. 2006
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Dolin RH, Alschuler L, Boyer S, Beebe C, Behlen FM, Biron PV. et al. HL7 Clinical Document Architecture, Release 2. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13 (01) 30-39.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Oates E, Bjerregaard Jensen H. Building Regional Health Care Networks in Europe. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2000.
  • 55 Katehakis DG, Bruun-Rasmussen M, Pakarinen X, Piggott D, Saranummi N. PICNIC Technology. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 115: 61-91.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 CEN/TC251. prEN 12967-1(E): Health Informatics – Service architecture – Part 1: Enterprise viewpoint (Document stage: Candidate for enquiry). 2006 (cited 20.09.2006).
    PubMed
  • 57 ISO/IEEE. ISO/IEEE 11073:2004 Health informatics – Point-of-care medical device communication. Geneva: ISO; 2004.
  • 58 CLSI. POCT1-A2 Point-of-Care Connectivity; Approved Standards – Second Edition. Wayne (PA): Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI); 2006.
  • 59 Yao J, Warren S. Applying the ISO/IEEE 11073 standards to wearable home health monitoring systems. J Clin Monit Comput 2005; 19 (06) 427-436.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Istepanian R, Jovanov E, Zhang YT. Introduction to the special section on M-Health: beyond seamless mobility and global wireless health-care connectivity. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2004; 08 (04) 405-414.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Maglaveras N, Chouvarda I, Koutkias VG, Gogou G, Lekka I, Goulis D. et al. The Citizen Health System (CHS): amodular medical contact center providing quality telemedicine services. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2005; 09 (03) 353-362.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Masseroli M, Visconti A, Giovanni Bano S, Pinciroli F. He@lth Co-op: a web-based system to support distributed healthcare co-operative work. Comput Biol Med 2006; 36 (02) 109-127.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Alesanco A, Olmos S, Istepanian RS, Garcia J. Enhanced real-time ECG coder for packetized telecardiology applications. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2006; 10 (02) 229-236.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Norgall T, Schmidt R, von der Grun T. Body area network – a key infrastructure element for patient-centered telemedicine. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 108: 142-148.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 van Halteren A, Bults R, Wac K, Dokovsky N, Koprinkov G, Widya I. et al. Wireless body area networks for healthcare: the Mobi Health project. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 108: 181-193.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Schettlinger K, Fried R, Gather U. Robust filters for intensive care monitoring: beyond the running median. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2006; 51 (02) 49-56.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Keogh E, Lin J, Fu AW, Van Herle H. Finding unusual medical time-series subsequences: algorithms and applications. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2006; 10 (03) 429-439.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Altiparmak F, Ferhatosmanoglu H, Erdal S, Trost DC. Information mining over heterogeneous and high-dimensional time-series data in clinical trials databases. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2006; 10 (02) 254-263.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Wei L, Kumar N, Lolla V, Keogh E, Lonardi S, Ratanamahatana CA. et al. A Practical Tool for Visualizing and Data Mining Medical Time Series. Tsymbal A. et al. 18th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems; 2005. Dublin, Ireland: IEEE Computer Society; 2005: 341-346.
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Bricon-Souf N, Anceaux F, Bennani N, Dufresne E, Watbled L. A distributed coordination platform for home care: analysis, framework and prototype. Int J Med Inform 2005; 74 (10) 809-825.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Kafeza E, Chiu DK, Cheung SC, Kafeza M. Alerts in mobile healthcare applications: requirements and pilot study. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed 2004; 08 (02) 173-181.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Lymberis A. Research and development of smart wearable health applications: the challenge ahead. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 108: 155-161.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Bang M, Larsson A, Berglund E, Eriksson H. Distributed user interfaces for clinical ubiquitous computing applications. Int J Med Inform 2005; 74 7-8 545-551.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Coiera E, Clarke R. e-Consent: The design and implementation of consumer consent mechanisms in an electronic environment. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (02) 129-140.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Walseth OA, Arsand E, Sund T, Skipenes E. Wireless transfer of sensor data into electronic health records. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 116: 334-339.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Chronaki CE, Chiarugi F. Interoperability as a quality label for portable and wearable health monitoring systems. Stud Health Technol Inform 2005; 117: 108-116.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Shabo A. A global socio-economic-medico-legal model for the sustainability of longitudinal electronic health records. Part 1. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (03) 240-245.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Shabo A. A global socio-economic-medico-legal model for the sustainability of longitudinal electronic health records. Part 2. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (05) 498-505.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 CEN/TC251. prEN 13606-1: Health informatics – Electronic health record communication – Part 1: Reference model (CEN FV and ISO DIS Draft). 2006 (cited 21.09.2006]).
    PubMed
  • 80 Jaspers MW, Knaup P, Schmidt D. The computerized patient record: where do we stand?. Methods Inf Med 2006; 45 (Suppl. 01) 29-39.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Blobel BG. Educational challenge of health information systems’ interoperability. Methods Inf Med 2007; 46 (01) 52-56.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Beaudin JS, Intille SS, Morris ME. To track ornot to track: user reactions to concepts in longitudinal healthmonitoring. J Med Internet Res 2006; 08 (04) e29.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Stromberg A, Dahlstrom U, Fridlund B. Computer-based education for patients with chronic heart failure. A randomised, controlled, multi-centre trial of the effects on knowledge, compliance and quality of life. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 64 (13) 128-135.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Moehr JR. Methods of information in the age of prospective medicine. Methods Inf Med 2005; 44 (02) 270-272.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar