Phlebologie 2014; 43(04): 201-205
DOI: 10.12687/phleb2180-4-2014
Review Article
Schattauer GmbH

Patient positioning for duplex ultra-sound scanning of the leg vessels[*]

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
M. Marshall
1   Tegernsee/Planegg, Germany
,
C. Schwahn-Schreiber
2   Venenzentrum Elbe-Weser, Otterndorf, Germany
,
M.-W. Kleine
3   Planegg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 13 November 2013

Accepted after Revision: 16 June 2014

Publication Date:
04 January 2018 (online)

Summary

A uniform, standardised positioning of the patient is one of the requirements for a reliable standardisation of diagnostic findings and their documentation in colour duplex ultrasound of the leg vessels. We have endeavoured to present specific arguments in favour of a differentiated duplex ultrasound of the leg vessels with the patient supine in contrast to the routine investigation with the patient exclusively in the upright position. Naturally, the choice of patient positioning – supine, sitting, standing – depends on the nature of the diagnostic question or findings. In our view, a more detailed, time-consuming diagnosis of reflux is the domain of the supine investigation. This also applies to assessing recurrence at the saphenofemoral junction. However, as large, relevant reflux pathways can normally be adequately visualised and documented on examination in the standing position, the latter can readily be used to confirm the indication for large-scale measures to eliminate varices.

When investigating leg arteries, the patient must be as horizontal as possible for measurement of ankle brachial index. The examination of the lymphatic system with high-resolution duplex ultrasound is mentioned only briefly because the investigation raises no special problems related to patient positioning.

 
  • References

  • 1 Dyszynska A, Dyszynski T, Marshall M. Bedeutung des Diameters der Vena femoralis communis für die Manifestation eines Phlebödems. Phlebologie 2006; 35: A 14
  • 2 Dyszynski T, Marshall M, Lewandowski Z. Innendurchmesser der Vena femoralis communis als diagnostischer und prognostischer Parameter für die CVI. Phlebologie 1999; 28: 126-131.
  • 3 Fäustle S. Diameterwerte wichtiger Arterien und Venen einschließlich des Intima-Media-Komplexes bei Gesunden und Hochleistungssportlern. Inaug.-Dissertation, München. 2002
  • 4 Jeanneret C. Varikose, venöser Reflux und Valsalva. Schweiz Med Forum 2002; 28: 679-686.
  • 5 Jeanneret C, Labs KH, Aschwanden M, Bollinger A. et al. Physiological reflux and venous diameter change in the proximal lower limb veins during a standardised Valsalva manoeuvre. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1999; 17: 398-403.
  • 6 Kubale R, Stiegler H. (Hrsg.) Farbkodierte Duplexsonographie. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2002
  • 7 Marshall M. Differenzierte Beurteilung der „proximalen Beinveneninsuffizienz“ durch die Duplex-Sonographie. Perfusion 1991; 6: 191-197.
  • 8 Marshall M. Praktische Duplexsonographie. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1993
  • 9 Marshall M. Praktische Doppler-Sonographie. Berlin: Springer; 2. Auflage 1996
  • 10 Marshall M, Breu FX. Leitveneninsuffizienz (LVI). In: Marshall M, Breu FX. (Hrsg.) Handbuch der Angiologie. Landsberg: ecomed 1999. 7. Erg.-Lfg. 12/2002
  • 11 Marshall M, Fäustle S, Breu FX. Diameterwerte wichtiger Arterien und Venen zur Bewertung hypoplastischer und dilatierender Gefäßerkrankungen. Perfusion 1999; 12: 352-358.
  • 12 Marshall M. Schwahn-Schreiber C Lymph-, Lip- und Phlebödem. Differenzialdiagnostische Abklärung mittels hochauflösender Duplexsonographie. Gefäßchirurgie 2008; 13: 204-212.
  • 13 Peiper C, Junge K, Füting A. et al. (Abstract ohne Titel). Der Chirurg 1998; 69 Nr. 10
  • 14 Tiecks FP, Lam AM, Matta BF. et al. Effects of the Valsalva manoeuvre on cerebral circulation in healthy adults. A transcranial Doppler study. Stroke 1995; 26: 1386
  • 15 van Bemmelen P, Bedford G, Beach K, Strandness D. Quantitative segmental evaluation of venous valvular reflux with duplex ultrasound scanning. J Vasc Surg 1989; 10: 425-431.