Phlebologie 2017; 46(05): 282-287
DOI: 10.12687/phleb2384-5-2017
Review
Schattauer GmbH

EHIT after thermoablation

Incidence and managementEHIT nach ThermoablationInzidenz und Management
R. Di Mitri
1   Casa di Cura San Rossore-Pisa, Italy
,
M. Leo
1   Casa di Cura San Rossore-Pisa, Italy
,
R. Romano
1   Casa di Cura San Rossore-Pisa, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 26 June 2017

Accepted: 04 August 2017

Publication Date:
04 January 2018 (online)

Summary

Aim: After 10 years of experience, we evaluated the incidence and management of endothermal heat-induced-thrombosis (EHIT), i.e. saphenous vein thrombosis following endothermic treatment of saphenous vein re-flux.

Methods: From 2006 to 2016 data were retrospectively collected on 840 patients undergoing saphenous vein treatment by laser and radiofrequency technique. All patients were treated with tumescent local anaesthesia in an ambulatory setting to promote early mobilization. Class II compression stockings and heparin were recommended for 5 days post-operatively.

Results: EHIT was observed in 15 patients from a total of 992 saphenous veins which were evaluated (1,5 %). 14 patients treated by EVLA had EHIT 1, one patient by RFA had EHIT 2, complicated by pulmonary embolism. All EHIT patients were treated by low weight molecular heparin. 980 nm laser and bare-tip fibres had been used in EVLA-EHIT patients. EHIT was not observed in patients treated by 1470 nm laser and radial fibres.

Conclusions: Latest generation technology, the ambulatory setting and local anaesthesia probably contributed to the low incidence of EHIT reported. Further studies are necessary for a better acquaintance of these complications and to facilitate the development of specific guidelines.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Nach 10-jähriger Erfahrung werteten wir die Inzidenz und das Management der Progression von Sapheno-Thrombosen im tiefen Venensystem nach endothermischer Behand-lung von Saphena-Venen-Reflux aus. Diese Komplikation wird als endotherme Hitze-induzierte Thrombose (EHIT) bezeichnet.

Methoden: Von 2006 bis 2016 wurden die Daten retrospektiv von 840 Patienten analysiert, die sich einer Saphena-Venenbehandlung durch Laser- und Hochfrequenztechnik unterzogen haben. Alle Patienten wurden durch TumeszenzLokalanästhesie und durch eine ambulante Einstellung behandelt, um ein schnelles Gehen zu fördern. Grad 2-Kompressionsstrümpfe und Heparin für fünf Folgetage wurde empfohlen.

Ergebnisse: EHIT wurde bei 15 Patienten und 992 Saphena-Venen (1,5 %) beobachtet. 14 Patienten, die mit EVLA behandelt wurden, zeigten EHIT 1, ein Patient unter RFA zeigte EHIT 2, kompliziert durch Lungenembolie. Alle EHIT-Patienten wurden mit niedermolekularem Heparin behandelt. 980 nm bare-tip Laser wurden bei EVLA-EHIT-Patienten verwendet. Es wurde kein EHIT bei Patienten gefunden, die mit 1470 nm Radialfaser-Lasern behandelt wurden.

Schlussfolgerungen: Die Technologie der neuesten Generation, ambulante Einstellung und lokale Anästhesie führten vermutlich zur niedrigen Inzidenz von EHIT. Weitere Studien sind notwendig, um eine bessere Kenntnis dieser Komplikationen und für die Entwick-lung spezifischer Richtlinien zu erlangen.

 
  • References

  • 1 Callam MJ. Epidemiology of varicose veins. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 167-173.
  • 2 Kundu S, Lurie F, Millward SF, Padberg Jr F, Vedantham S, Elias S. et al. Recommended reporting standards for endovenous ablation for the treatment of venous insufficiency: joint statement of The American Venous Forum and The Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46: 582-589.
  • 3 Siribumrungwong B, Noorit P, Wilasrusmee C, Attia J, Thakkinstian A. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing endovenous ablation and surgical intervention in patients with varicose vein. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012; 44: 214-223.
  • 4 Lowell S, Kabnick FACS MD, FACPh Todd L, Berland MD. Endothermal Heat Induced Thrombosis (EHIT), presented at the 38th Annual Vascular and Endovascular Issues, Techniques and Horizons (VEITHsymposium), November 16–20, 2011, New York City.
  • 5 Mozes G, Kalra M, Carmo M, Swenson L, Gloviczki P. Extension of saphenous thrombus into the femoral vein: A potential complication of new endovenous ablation techniques. J Vasc Surg 2005; 41: 130-135.
  • 6 Haqqani OP, Vasiliu C, O’Donnell TF, Iafrati MD. Great saphenous vein patency and endovenous heat-induced thrombosis after endovenous thermal ablation with modified catheter tip positioning. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54: 10S-17S.
  • 7 Marsh P, Price BA, Holdstock J, Harrison C, Whiteley MS. Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) after Venous Thermoablation Techniques: Rates of Endovenous Heat-induced Thrombosis (EHIT) and Classical DVT after Radiofrequency and Endovenous Laser Ablation in a Single Centre. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 40: 521e-527e.
  • 8 Kane K, Fisher T, Bennett M, Shutze W, Hicks T, Grimsley B, Gable D, Pearl G, Smith B, Shutze Sr W. The Incidence and Outcome of Endothermal Heat-induced Thrombosis after Endovenous Laser Ablation. Ann Vasc Surg 2014; 28 (Suppl. 07) 1744-1750.
  • 9 Kwak JH. et al. Delayed Presentation of Endovenous Heat-Induced Thrombosis Treated by Thrombolysis and Subsequent Open Thrombectomy. Vascular Specialist International 2016; 32.
  • 10 Kabnick LS, Ombrellino M, Agis H. et al. Endovenous heat induced thrombus (EHIT) at the superficial-deep venous junction: a new post-treatment clinical entity, classification and potential treatment strategies. 18th Annual Meeting of the American Venous Forum, Miami, FL: February 2006.
  • 11 Van Den Bos RR, Neumann M, De Roos KP, Nijsten T. Endovenous laser ablation-induced complications: review of the literature and new cases. Dermatol Surg 2009; 35 (Suppl. 08) 1206-1214.
  • 12 Gale SS, Lee JN, Walsh E. et al. A randomized, controlled trial of endovenous thermal ablation using the 810-nm wavelength laser and the ClosurePLUS radiofrequency ablation methods for superficial venous insufficiency of the great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52: 645e-650e.
  • 13 Benarroch-Gampel J, Sheffield KM, Boyd CA. et al. Analysis of venous thromboembolic events after saphenous ablation. J Vasc Surg 2013; 1: 26e-32e.
  • 14 Lawrence PF, Chandra A, Wu M. et al. Classification of proximal endovenous closure levels and treatment algorithm. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52: 388e-393e.
  • 15 Sadek M, Kabnick LS, Rockman CB. et al. Increasing ablation distance peripheral to the saphenofe-moral junction may result in a diminished rate of endothermal heat induced thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 2013; 1: 257e-262e.
  • 16 Berland TL HA, Oldenburg WA. et al. Thrombus Extension into the Common Femoral Vein Following Endovenous Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein for the Treatment of Venous Insufficiency. Journal for Vascular Ultrasound 2006; 30 (Suppl. 03) 129-131.
  • 17 Hingorani AP, Ascher E, Markevich N. et al. Deep venous thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation of greater saphenous vein: a word of caution. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40 (Suppl. 03) 500-504.
  • 18 Min RJ, Khilnani N, Zimmet SE. Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux: long-term results. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003; 14 (Suppl. 08) 991-996.
  • 19 Rhee SJ, Cantelmo NL, Conrad MF, Stoughton J. Factors influencing the incidence of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT). Vasc Endovascular Surg 2013; 47: 207-212.
  • 20 Sufian S, Arnez A, Labropoulos N, Lakhanpal S. Endovenous heat-induced thrombosis after ablation with 1470 nm laser: Incidence, progression, and risk factors. Phlebology 2015; 30 (Suppl. 05) 325-330.
  • 21 Sufian S, Arnez A, Labropoulos N, Lakhanpal S. Incidence, progression, and risk factors for endovenous heat-induced thrombosis after radiofrequency ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2013; 1 (Suppl. 02) 159-164.
  • 22 Hirokawa M, Kurihara N. Comparison of Bare-Tip and Radial Fiber in Endovenous Laser Ablation with 1470 nm Diode Laser. Ann Vasc Dis 2014; 7: 239-245.
  • 23 Hirokawa M, Ogawa T, Sugawara H. et al. Comparison of 1470 nm Laser and Radial 2ring Fiber with 980 nm Laser and Bare-Tip Fiber in Endovenous Laser Ablation of Saphenous Varicose Veins: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Non-Blind Study. Ann Vasc Dis 2015; 8: 282-289.
  • 24 Jorgensen J. et al. The incidence of deep venous thrombosis in patients with superficial thrombophlebitis of the lower limbs. J Vasc Surg 1993; 18 (Suppl. 01) 70-73.
  • 25 Changelis D. et al. Progression of superficial venous thrombosis to deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 1966; 24 (Suppl. 05) 745.
  • 26 Zucchetta V. et al. An unexpectedly high rate of pulmonary embolism in patients with superficial thrombophlebitis of the tight. J Vasc Surg 1991; 30 (Suppl. 06) 1113-1115.
  • 27 Kabnick L, Berland T. Endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT). Paper presented at: 38th Annual Vascular and Endovascular Issues, Techniques and Horizons (VEITH symposium); 2011 Nov 16–20; New York; 1–8.
  • 28 Werth S, Halbritter K, Mahlmann A, Weiss N. Treatment of endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) with rivaroxaban (Xarelto). Phlebology 2015; 44: 184-187.