Morphology-based Features for Adaptive Mitosis Detection of In Vitro Stem Cell Tracking Data

Summary

Objectives: The cultivation of adherently growing cell populations is a major task in the field of adult stem cell production used for drug discovery and in the field of regenerative medicine. To assess the quality of a cell population, a crucial event is the mitotic cell division: the precise knowledge of these events enables the reconstruction of lineages and accurate proliferation curves as well as a detailed analysis of cell cycles. To serve in an autonomous cell farming framework, such a detector requires to work reliably and unsupervised.

Methods: We introduce a mitosis detector that is using a maximum likelihood (ML) estimator based on morphological cell features (cell area, brightness, length, compactness). It adapts to the 3 phases of cell growth (lag, log and stationary phase). As a concurrent model, we compared ML with kernel SVMs using linear, quadratic and Gaussian kernel functions. All approaches are evaluated for their ability to distinguish between mitotic and nonmitotic events. The large, publicly available benchmark data CeTReS (reference data set A with > 240,000 segmented cells, > 2,000 mitotic events) is used for this evaluation.

Results: The adaptive (unsupervised) ML approach clearly outperforms previously published non-adaptive approaches and the linear SVM. Furthermore, it robustly reaches a performance comparable to quadratic and Gaussian SVM.

Conclusions: The proposed simple and label free adaptive variant might be the method of choice when it comes to autonomous cell farming. Hereby, it is essential to have reliable and unsupervised mitosis detection that covers all phases of cell growth.

Keywords

Time-lapse imaging - cell tracking - mitosis detection - image processing - phase contrast microscopy

• References

• 1 Eilken HM, Nishikawa S, Schroeder T. Continuous single-cell imaging of blood generation from haemogenic endothelium. Nature 2009; 457 7231 896-900.
• 2 Cohen AR, Gomes FLAF, Roysam B, Cayouette M. Computational prediction of neural progenitor cell fates. Nature Methods 2010; 7: 213-218.
• 3 Al-Kofahi O, Radke RJ, Goderie SK, Shen Q, Temple S, Roysam B. Automated Cell Lineage Construction: A Rapid Method to Analyze Clonal Development Established with Murine Neural Progenitor. Cell Cycle 2006; 5 (03) 327-335.
• 4 Debeir O, Milojevic D, Leloup T, Ham PV, Kiss R, Decaestecker C. Mitotic Tree Construction by Computer In Vitro Cell Tracking: a Tool for Proliferation and Motility Features Extraction. In: Proceedings of the EUROCON 2005- The International Conference on Computer as a Tool. Belgrade: Serbia and Montenegro; 2005: 951-954.
• 5 Liu A, Li K, Kanade T. Mitosis sequence detection using hidden conditional random fields. In: Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, 2010 IEEE International Symposium. 2010: 580-583.
• 6 Li K, Miller ED, Chen M, Kanade T, Weiss LE, Campbell PG. Computer vision tracking of stemness. In. Proccedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro. Paris, France: 2008: 847-850.
• 7 Freshney RI. Basic Principles of Cell Culture. Hoboken, NJ, USA; John Wiley and Sons: 2006
• 8 Rapoport DH, Becker T, Madany Mamlouk A, Schicktanz S, Kruse C. A Novel Validation Algorithm Allows for Automated Cell Tracking and the Extraction of Biologically Meaningful Parameters. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: 11.
• 9 Ker DFE, Weiss LE, Junkers SN, Chen M, Yin Z. et al. An Engineered Approach to Stem Cell Culture: Automating the Decision Process for Real-Time Adaptive Subculture of Stem Cells. PLoS ONE 2011; 6: 11.
• 10 Becker T, Rapoport DH, Madany Mamlouk A. Adaptive Mitosis Detection in Large in vitro Stem Cell Populations using Timelapse Microscopy. In: Bildverabeitung für die Medizin (BVM) 2011. Informatik aktuell. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag; 2011: 49-53.
• 11 Schölkopf B, Smola AJ. Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond. Cambridge, MA, SA; MIT Press: 2001
• 12 Kruse C, Kajahn J, Petschnik AE, Maasß A, Rapoport EKDH, Wedel T. Adult pancreatic stem/progenitor cells spontaneously differentiate in vitro into multiple cell lineages and form teratoma-like structures. Annals of Anatomy 2006; 188: 503-517.
• 13 Atienza JM, Zhu J, Wang X, Xu X, Abassi Y. Dynamic Monitoring of Cell Adhesion and Spreading on Microelectronic Sensor Arrays. Journal of Biomolecular Screening 2005; 10 (08) 795-805.
• 14 Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray level histograms. IEEE Trans Systems, Man and Cybernetics 1979; 9: 62-66.
• 15 Li K, Chen M, Kanade T, Miller E, Weiss L, Campbell P. Cell Population Tracking and Lineage Construction with Spatiotemporal Context. Medical Image Analysis 2008; 12 (01) 546-566.
• 16 Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support Vector Networks. Journal of Machine Learning 1995; 20: 273-297.