Ultraschall Med 2011; 32(S 02): E75-E79
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1282024
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Differentiation Between Phyllodes Tumor and Fibroadenoma Using Real-Time Elastography

Differenzierung zwischen Phylloides-Tumor und Fibroadenom mittels Elastografie
B. R. Adamietz
1   Diagnostische Radiologie, Universität Erlangen
,
L. Kahmann
2   Universitätsfrauenklinik, Universität Erlangen
,
P. A. Fasching
2   Universitätsfrauenklinik, Universität Erlangen
,
R. Schulz-Wendtland
3   Gynäkologische Radiologie, Diagnost. Radiologie Univ. Erlangen
,
M. Uder
1   Diagnostische Radiologie, Universität Erlangen
,
M. W. Beckmann
2   Universitätsfrauenklinik, Universität Erlangen
,
M. Meier-Meitinger
1   Diagnostische Radiologie, Universität Erlangen
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

23 December 2010

14 November 2011

Publication Date:
22 December 2011 (online)

Abstract

Purpose: Phyllodes tumors (PT) are a rare entity accounting for less than 1 % of all breast lesions. They have a malignancy rate of 25 – 30 %. Differentiation from benign fibroadenomas is difficult using ultrasound, mammogram and MRI. The elastic characteristics of both tumors were examined using real-time elastography (RTE) to find specific patterns that make differentiation possible.

Materials and Methods: From February 2007 to May 2009, a total of 620 women were examined by RTE. Histological diagnosis was achieved using core needle biopsy. 123 of the lesions were fibroadenomas, 8 were phyllodes tumors. All patients underwent mammography and ultrasound followed by RTE. Sonography was performed by Acuson Antares, Premium Edition® (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a 7 and 10 MHz transducer.

Results: All phyllodes tumors had a similar elastic pattern with an elastic center and inelastic outer limits, referred to as the “ring sign”. It was found in 5 % of all fibroadenomas.

Conclusion: RTE provides a specific elastic pattern, which is sufficient for differentiating between a fibroadenoma and a phyllodes tumor. Therefore, the detection of the most suspicious lesion in women with the coexistence of multiple fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumors seems easier.

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Phylloides-Tumoren zählen zu den seltenen Brusttumoren und haben in 25 – 30 % ein malignes Potential. Die Unterscheidung zwischen Phylloides-Tumor und Fibroadenom ist mit Ultraschall, Mammografie und MRT nicht eindeutig möglich. Ziel war es daher, die Eigenschaften beider Tumortypen in der Real-time-Elastografie (RTE) zu untersuchen und herauszufinden, ob es ein charakteristisches Bildmuster gibt, welches die Differenzierung beider Tumortypen erlaubt.

Material und Methoden: Zwischen Februar 2007 und Mai 2009 wurden 620 Frauen mittels Mammografie, Sonografie und RTE untersucht. Bei 450 von ihnen wurde eine Histologie mittels Stanzbiopsie gewonnen, welche 123 Fibroadenome und 8 Phylloides-Tumoren ergab. Die Sonografie und RTE wurden mit einem 7 und 10 MHz Schallkopf an einem Acuson Antares, Premium Edition® Ultraschallgerät (Siemens, Erlangen, Deutschland) durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse: Alle Phylloides-Tumoren hatten das gleiche Bildmuster in der RTE mit einem elastischen Kern und einem unelastischen Halo. Dies wurde als „Ringzeichen“ tituliert. Es wurde auch in 5 % aller Fibroadenome nachgewiesen.

Schlussfolgerung: Phylloides-Tumoren haben in der RTE ein charkteristisches Bildmuster, welches die Differenzierung zu Fibroadenomen ermöglicht. Speziell bei Frauen, bei denen neben einem Phylloides-Tumor gleichzeitig mehrere Fibroadenome nachweisbar sind, hilft die RTE bei der Auswahl einer geeigneten Läsion für eine Stanzbiopsie.

 
  • References

  • 1 Müller J. Über den feineren Bau und die Formen krankhafter Geschwulste. 1. Berlin: G Reiner; 1838: 54-57
  • 2 Parker SJ, Harries SA. Phyllodes tumours. Postgrad Med J 2001; 77: 428-435
  • 3 Tse GMK, Niu Y, Shi HJ. Phyllodes tumor of the breast, an update. Breast Cancer 2010; 17: 29-34
  • 4 Jacklin RK, Ridgway PF, Ziprin P et al. Optimizing preoperative diagnosis in phyllodes tumour of the breast. J Clin Pathol 2006; 59: 454-459
  • 5 Norris HJ, Taylor HB. Relationship of histologic features to behaviour of cystosarcoma phyllodes. Analysis of ninety-four cases. Cancer 1967; 20: 2090-2099
  • 6 Anderson BO, Lawton TJ, Lehman CD et al. Phyllodes tumors. In: Harris JR, Lippmann ME, Morrow M, Osborne CK, (eds.) Disease of the breast. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Wiliams & Wilkins publishers; 2004: 991-1006
  • 7 McDivitt RW, Urban JA, Farrow JH. Cystosarcoma phyllodes. Johns Hopkins Med J 1967; 120: 33-45
  • 8 Kraemer B, Hoffmann J, Roehm C et al. Cystosarcoma phylloides of the breast: a rare diagnosis: case studies an review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2007; 276: 649-653
  • 9 Barth RJ Jr, Wells WA, Mitchell SE et al. A prospective, multi-institutional study of adjuvant radiotherapy after resection of malignant phyllodes tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16: 2288-2294
  • 10 Bellocq JP, Margo G. Fibroepithelial tumors. In: Tavassoli FA, Devilee P, (eds.) World Health Organisation Classification of Tumors: Tumors of the Breast and Femal Genital Organs. Lyon France: IARC Press; 2003: 99-103
  • 11 Cosmacini P, Zurrida S, Veronesi P et al. Phyllode tumor of the breast: mammographic experience in 99 cases. Eur J Radiol 1992; 15: 11-14
  • 12 Guerrero MA, Ballard BR, Grau AM. Malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast: review of the literature and case report of stromal overgrowth. Surg Oncol 2003; 12: 27-37
  • 13 Liberman L, Bonaccio E, Hamele-Bena D et al. Benign and malignant phyllodes tumors: mammographic and sonographic findings. Radiology 1996; 198: 121-124
  • 14 Abe M, Miyata S, Nishimura S et al. Malignant transformation of breast fibroadenoma to malignant phylodes tumor: long-term outcome of 36 malignant phyllodes tumors. Breast cancer 2011; 18: 268-272
  • 15 Foxcroft LM, Evans EB, Porter AJ. Difficulties in the pre-operative diagnosis of phyllodes tumors of the breast: a study of 84 cases. Breast 2006; 27: 27-37
  • 16 Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E et al. Breast Disease: Clinical Application of US Elastography for Diagnosis. Radiology 2006; 239: 341-350
  • 17 Navarro B, Ubeda B, Vallespí M et al. Role of elastography in the assessment of breast lesions: preliminary results. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 30: 313-321
  • 18 Chang JM, Moon WK, Cho N et al. Breast Mass Evaluation: Factors Influencing the Quality of US Elastography. Radiology 2011; 259: 59-64
  • 19 Wojcinski S, Farrokh A, Weber S et al. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 484-491
  • 20 Satake H, Nishio A, Ikeda M et al. Predictive value for malignancy of suspicious breast masses of BI-RADS categories 4 and 5 using ultrasound elastography and MR diffusion-weighted imaging. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 202-209
  • 21 Adamietz BR, Meier-Meitinger M, Fasching P et al. New diagnostic criteria in real-time elastography for the assessment of breast lesions. Ultraschall in Med 2011; 32: 67-73
  • 22 Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, Tanter M et al. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging – preliminary results. Radiology 2010; 256: 297-303
  • 23 Meier-Meitinger M, Häberle L, Fasching PA et al. Assessment of breast cancer tumour size using six different methods. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1180-1187
  • 24 Rosen PP, Obermann HA. Fibroepithelial neoplasms. In: Roai J, Sobin LH. Atlas of tumor pathology: tumors of the mammary gland. Washington, DC: Armed Forces Institute of Pathology; 1993: 107-114
  • 25 Buchberger W, Strasser K, Heim K et al. Phylloides tumor: findings on mammography, sonography, and aspiration cytology in 10 cases. Am J Roentgenol 1991; 157: 715-719
  • 26 Chao TC, Lo YF, Chen SC et al. Phyllodes tumors of the breast. Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 88-93
  • 27 Cole-Beuglet C, Soriano R, Kurtz AB et al. Ultrasound, x-ray mammography, and histopathology of cystosarcoma phylloides. Radiology 1983; 146: 481-486
  • 28 Holocombe C, Pugh N, Lyons K et al. Blood flow in breast cancer and fibroadenoma estimated by colour Doppler ultrasonography. Br J Surg 1995; 82: 787-788
  • 29 McNicholas MMJ, Mercer PM, Miller JC et al. Color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of palpable breast masses. Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 765-771
  • 30 Yoon JH, Kim MH, Kim EK et al. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196: 730-736
  • 31 Fleury Ede F, Fleury JC, Piato S et al. New elastographic classification of breast lesions during and after compression. Jr Diagn Interv Radiol 2009; 15: 96-103