Endoscopy 2005; 37(4): 340-345
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-861051
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Oil-Lubricated Colonoscopy: Easier and Less Painful?

E.  Brocchi1 , R.  Pezzilli1 , M.  Bonora1 , P.  Tomassetti1 , M.  Romanelli2 , R.  Corinaldesi1
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, University of Bologna, Italy
  • 2Department of Medicine and Public Health, University of Bologna, Italy
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 21 May 2004

Accepted after Revision 3 November 2004

Publication Date:
12 April 2005 (online)

Background and Study Aims: Methods of lubrication are rarely considered to be a matter for study in gastrointestinal endoscopy. We evaluated a new technique, i. e. the release of seed oil in discrete amounts from the tip of the scope during colonoscopy.
Patients and Methods: 346 consecutive patients prospectively underwent colonoscopy with a standard lubricating method (using water-soluble jelly; group A) or with the standard method plus seed oil (corn oil) instillations through the biopsy channel (group B). The following variables were evaluated in the two groups: the success rate for total intubation, and the time required to reach the cecum; the time needed to examine the colon at withdrawal; the detection rates for colorectal diseases; the level of pain and degree of difficulty associated with the examination. Patients in whom total colonoscopy was not achieved were asked to undergo a further examination in which the other lubricating technique was used.
Results: Successful intubation to the cecum was significantly more frequent (P < 0.005) in the oil lubrication group (group B, 159/168) than in the control group (group A, 145/170), and less time was needed (P < 0.001). No significant differences were found with regard to time for examination at withdrawal and detection rates for colorectal diseases. Level of pain and degree of difficulty during colonoscopy were significantly lower in the oil group (P < 0.001). In the cross-over examinations done in patients in whom total colonoscopy was not achieved, no statistical difference was found between the two groups. We observed no side effects for patients or damage to the instrument.
Conclusions: The proposed technique could be a simple, safe, and inexpensive method for easier and less painful colonoscopy; moreover, it might facilitate difficult examinations. Further studies are needed to confirm our data and to ensure that the use of this technique is not liable to damage the scope.

References

  • 1 Durdey P, Weston P MT, Williams N S. Colonoscopy or barium enema as initial investigation of colonic disease.  Lancet. 1987;  2 549-551
  • 2 Lindsay D C, Freeman J G, Cobden I. et al . Should colonoscopy be the first investigation for colonic disease?.  Br Med J. 1988;  296 167-169
  • 3 Cotton P B, Connor P, McGee D. et al . Colonoscopy: practice variation among 69 hospital-based endoscopists.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 352-357
  • 4 Waye J D, Bashkoff E. Total colonoscopy: is it always possible?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 152-154
  • 5 Church J M. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 556-560
  • 6 Anderson J C, Messina C R, Cohn W. et al . Factors predictive of difficult colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 558-562
  • 7 Nelson D B, McQuaid K R, Bond J H. et al . Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 307-314
  • 8 Saunders B P, Williams C B. The variable-stiffness colonoscope: ”Too stiff or not too stiff, that is the question” - a new twist to the plot.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 70-73
  • 9 Ravi J, Brodmerkel G J, Agrawal R M. et al . Does prior abdominal or pelvic surgery affect length of insertion of the colonoscope?.  Endoscopy. 1988;  34 69
  • 10 Hull T, Church J M. Colonoscopy: how difficult, how painful?.  Surg Endosc. 1994;  8 784-787
  • 11 Hunt R H. Colonoscopy intubation techniques with fluoroscopy. In: Hunt RH, Waye JD, editors Colonoscopy techniques: clinical practice and colour atlas. London; Chapman and Hall 1981: 109-146
  • 12 Waye J D. Colonoscopy intubation techniques without fluoroscopy. In: Hunt RH, Waye JD, editors Colonoscopy techniques: clinical practice and colour atlas. London; Chapman and Hall 1981: 147-178
  • 13 Cotton P B, Williams C B. Colonoscopy. In: Cotton PB, Williams CB, editors Practical gastrointestinal endoscopy. Cambridge, Massachusetts; Blackwell Science Publications 1990: 160-223
  • 14 Baillie J. Colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal endoscopy: basic principles and practice. Oxford; Butterworth-Heinemann 1992: 63-92
  • 15 Williams C B, Saunders B P. Technique of colonoscopy. In: Raskin J, Juergen NH, editors Colonoscopy principles and techniques. New York; Igaku-Shoin Medical Publishers 1995: 121-142
  • 16 Marshall J B. Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success to total colonoscopy in selected adult patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  44 675-678
  • 17 Saifuddin T, Trivedi M, King P D. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 314-317
  • 18 Brooker J C, Saunders B P, Shah S G. et al . A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomized controlled trial.  Gut. 2000;  46 801-805
  • 19 Shah S G, Brooker J C, Thapar C. et al . Patient pain during colonoscopy: an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging.  Endoscopy. 2002;  34 435-440
  • 20 Davis G R, Santa Ana CA, Morawski S G. et al . Inhibition of water and electrolyte absorption by polyethylene glycol (PEG).  Gastroenterology. 1980;  79 35-39
  • 21 Appleyard M N, Mills T N, Mosse S. et al . Hydrogels and other lubricants in endoscopy [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 3334, AB64
  • 22 Brekkan E, Ehrnebo M, Malmstrom P U. et al . A controlled study of low and high volume anesthetic jelly as a lubricant and pain reliever during cystoscopy.  J Urol. 1991;  146 24-27
  • 23 Tomita N, Tamai S, Okajima E. et al . Biomaterials lubricated for minimum frictional resistance.  J Applied Biomaterials. 1994;  5 175-181
  • 24 Goldfischer E R, Cromie W J, Karrison T G. et al . Randomized, prospective, double-blind study of the effects on perception of lidocaine jelly versus plain lubricant during outpatient rigid cystoscopy.  J Urol. 1997;  157 90-94
  • 25 Appleyard M N, Mosse C A, Mills T N. et al . The measurement of forces exerted during colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  52 237-240
  • 26 Rex D K. Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 60-64
  • 27 Marshall J B, Patel M, Mahajan R J. et al . Benefit of intravenous antispasmodic (hyoscyamine sulfate) as premedication for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 720-726
  • 28 Church J. Warm water irrigation for dealing with spasm during colonoscopy: simple, inexpensive and effective.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 672-674
  • 29 Hamamoto N, Nakanishi Y, Morimoto N. et al . A new water instillation method for colonoscopy without sedation as performed by endoscopists-in-training.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 825-828

E. Brocchi, M. D.

Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, University of Bologna ·

Via Cavallina 2 · 40137 Bologna · Italy

Fax: +39-051-345864

Email: brocchi@med.unibo.it

    >