RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000089.xml
Ultraschall Med
DOI: 10.1055/a-2265-1070
DOI: 10.1055/a-2265-1070
Review
Student ultrasound education – current views and controversies
Ultraschallausbildung für Studierende – aktuelle Ansichten und Kontroversen
Abstract
As an extension of the clinical examination and as a diagnostic and problem-solving tool, ultrasound has become an established technique for clinicians. A prerequisite for high-quality clinical ultrasound practice is adequate student ultrasound training. In light of the considerable heterogeneity of ultrasound curricula in medical studies worldwide, this review presents basic principles of modern medical student ultrasound education and advocates for the establishment of an ultrasound core curriculum embedded both horizontally and vertically in medical studies.
Zusammenfassung
Als Erweiterung der klinischen Untersuchung, als Diagnose- und Problemlösungsinstrument ist die Sonografie zu einer etablierten Technik für den Arzt geworden. Voraussetzung für eine qualitativ hochwertige klinische Ultraschallpraxis ist die angemessene Ultraschallausbildung der Studierenden. Angesichts der beträchtlichen Heterogenität der Ultraschall-Curricula im Medizinstudium weltweit werden in dieser Übersicht die Grundprinzipien der modernen Ultraschall-Ausbildung von Medizinstudenten vorgestellt und die Einführung eines Ultraschall-Kerncurriculums befürwortet, das sowohl horizontal als auch vertikal in das Medizinstudium eingebettet ist.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 07. Januar 2024
Angenommen: 05. Februar 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
14. März 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Dietrich CF, Bolondi L, Duck F. et al. History of Ultrasound in Medicine from its birth to date (2022), on occasion of the 50 Years Anniversary of EFSUMB. A publication of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound In Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB), designed to record the historical development of medical ultrasound. Med Ultrason 2022; 24: 434-450
- 2 Dietrich CF, Bulla P, Dudwiesus H. et al. [Perspectives and Challenges of hand-held Ultrasound]. Z Gastroenterol 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1901-9394. (PMID: 36170860)
- 3 Dietrich CF, Hoffmann B, Abramowicz J. et al. Medical Student Ultrasound Education: A WFUMB Position Paper, Part I. Ultrasound Med Biol 2019; 45: 271-281 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.09.017. (PMID: 30497768)
- 4 Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, Badea R. et al. EFSUMB Statement on Medical Student Education in Ultrasound [long version]. Ultrasound Int Open 2016; 2: E2-7 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1569413. (PMID: 27689163)
- 5 Hoppmann RA, Mladenovic J, Melniker L. et al. International consensus conference recommendations on ultrasound education for undergraduate medical students. Ultrasound J 2022; 14: 31 DOI: 10.1186/s13089-022-00279-1. (PMID: 35895165)
- 6 Davis JJ, Wessner CE, Potts J. et al. Ultrasonography in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37: 2667-2679 DOI: 10.1002/jum.14628. (PMID: 29708268)
- 7 Feilchenfeld Z, Dornan T, Whitehead C. et al. Ultrasound in undergraduate medical education: a systematic and critical review. Med Educ 2017; 51: 366-378 DOI: 10.1111/medu.13211. (PMID: 28118684)
- 8 Kenny EJG, Makwana HN, Thankachan M. et al. The Use of Ultrasound in Undergraduate Medical Anatomy Education: a Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis. Med Sci Educ 2022; 32: 1195-1208
- 9 Duarte ML, Santos LRD, Iared W. et al. Comparison of ultrasonography learning between distance teaching and traditional methodology. An educational systematic review. Sao Paulo Med J 2022; 140: 806-817
- 10 DeBiasio C, Pageau P, Shefrin A. et al. Point-of-Care-ultrasound in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review of assessment methods. Ultrasound J 2023; 15: 30 DOI: 10.1186/s13089-023-00325-6. (PMID: 37302105)
- 11 Tarique U, Tang B, Singh M. et al. Ultrasound Curricula in Undergraduate Medical Education: A Scoping Review. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37: 69-82 DOI: 10.1002/jum.14333. (PMID: 28748549)
- 12 Birrane J, Misran H, Creaney M. et al. A scoping review of ultrasound teaching in undergraduate medical education. Medical Science Educator 2018; 28: 45-56
- 13 Hoffmann B, Blaivas M, Abramowicz J. et al. Medical Student Ultrasound Education, a WFUMB Position Paper, Part II. A consensus statement of ultrasound societies. Med Ultrason 2020; 22: 220-229 DOI: 10.11152/mu-2599. (PMID: 32399529)
- 14 Cook T, Hunt P, Hoppman R. Emergency medicine leads the way for training medical students in clinician-based ultrasound: a radical paradigm shift in patient imaging. Acad Emerg Med 2007; 14: 558-561 DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.04.003. (PMID: 17535978)
- 15 Hoppmann RA, Rao VV, Poston MB. et al. An integrated ultrasound curriculum (iUSC) for medical students: 4-year experience. Crit Ultrasound J 2011; 3: 1-12 DOI: 10.1007/s13089-011-0052-9. (PMID: 21516137)
- 16 Hoppmann R, Cook T, Hunt P. et al. Ultrasound in medical education: a vertical curriculum at the University of South Carolina School of Medicine. J S C Med Assoc 2006; 102: 330-334 (PMID: 17703842)
- 17 Dinh VA, Lakoff D, Hess J. et al. Medical Student Core Clinical Ultrasound Milestones: A Consensus Among Directors in the United States. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 35: 421-434
- 18 Dietrich CF, Fraser AG, Dong Y. et al. Managing Incidental Findings Reported by Medical, Sonography and Other Students Performing Educational Ultrasound Examinations. Ultrasound Med Biol 2022; 48: 180-187 DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.09.015. (PMID: 34756465)
- 19 Lentz B, Fong T, Rhyne R. et al. A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of ultrasound in emergency care settings. Ultrasound J 2021; 13: 16 DOI: 10.1186/s13089-021-00216-8. (PMID: 33687607)
- 20 Jurjus RA, Dimorier K, Brown K. et al. Can anatomists teach living anatomy using ultrasound as a teaching tool?. Anat Sci Educ 2014; 7: 340-349 DOI: 10.1002/ase.1417. (PMID: 24327576)
- 21 Zander D, Huske S, Hoffmann B. et al. Ultrasound Image Optimization (“Knobology”): B-Mode. Ultrasound Int Open 2020; 6: E14-E24 DOI: 10.1055/a-1223-1134. (PMID: 32885137)
- 22 Lowe A, Jenssen C, Huske S. et al. “Knobology” in Doppler Ultrasound. Med Ultrason 2021; 23: 480-486 DOI: 10.11152/mu-3216. (PMID: 33945589)
- 23 Zervides C, Kefala-Karli P, Sassis L. Importance of Ultrasound Education in Undergraduate Medical Curriculum: A Survey Study Based on First-Year Medical Students’ Perception of the 6-Year Doctor of Medicine Program of the University of Nicosia Medical School in Cyprus. Ultrasound Q 2020; 36: 328-332 DOI: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000540. (PMID: 33136934)
- 24 Hoppmann RA, Riley R, Fletcher S. et al. First World Congress on ultrasound in medical education hosted by the University of South Carolina School of Medicine. J S C Med Assoc 2011; 107: 189-190 (PMID: 22057804)
- 25 Hoppmann RA, Rao VV, Bell F. et al. The evolution of an integrated ultrasound curriculum (iUSC) for medical students: 9-year experience. Crit Ultrasound J 2015; 7: 18 DOI: 10.1186/s13089-015-0035-3. (PMID: 26589313)
- 26 Hoppmann R, Michell W, Carter J. et al. Ultrasound in second year pathology medical education. J SC Acad Sci 2008; 7: 11-12
- 27 Prosch H, Radzina M, Dietrich CF. et al. Ultrasound Curricula of Student Education in Europe: Summary of the Experience. Ultrasound Int Open 2020; 6: E25-E33 DOI: 10.1055/a-1183-3009. (PMID: 32885138)
- 28 Nourkami-Tutdibi N, Tutdibi E, Schmidt S. et al. Long-Term Knowledge Retention after Peer-Assisted Abdominal Ultrasound Teaching: Is PAL a Successful Model for Achieving Knowledge Retention?. Ultraschall Med 2020; 41: 36-43 DOI: 10.1055/a-1034-7749. (PMID: 31745964)
- 29 Weimer JM, Widmer N, Strelow KU. et al. Long-Term Effectiveness and Sustainability of Integrating Peer-Assisted Ultrasound Courses into Medical School – A Prospective Study. Tomography 2023; 9: 1315-1328
- 30 Rong K, Lee G, Herbst MK. Effectiveness of Near-Peer Versus Faculty Point-of-Care Ultrasound Instruction to Third-Year Medical Students. POCUS J 2022; 7: 239-244 DOI: 10.24908/pocus.v7i2.15746. (PMID: 36896384)
- 31 Hari R, Caprez R, Dolmans D. et al. Describing Ultrasound Skills Teaching by Near-Peer and Faculty Tutors Using Cognitive Apprenticeship. Teach Learn Med 2022; 1-10
- 32 Tanveer MA, Mildestvedt T, Skjaerseth IG. et al. Peer Teaching in Undergraduate Medical Education: What are the Learning Outputs for the Student-Teachers? A Systematic Review. Adv Med Educ Pract 2023; 14: 723-739
- 33 Knobe M, Munker R, Sellei RM. et al. Peer teaching: a randomised controlled trial using student-teachers to teach musculoskeletal ultrasound. Med Educ 2010; 44: 148-155 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03557.x. (PMID: 20040056)
- 34 Celebi N, Zwirner K, Lischner U. et al. Student tutors are able to teach basic sonographic anatomy effectively – a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ultraschall Med 2012; 33: 141-145 DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245837. (PMID: 21104601)
- 35 Vallee A, Blacher J, Cariou A. et al. Blended Learning Compared to Traditional Learning in Medical Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22: e16504 DOI: 10.2196/16504. (PMID: 32773378)
- 36 Konge L, Albrecht-Beste E, Nielsen MB. Virtual-reality simulation-based training in ultrasound. Ultraschall Med 2014; 35: 95-97 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1366191. (PMID: 24729422)
- 37 Lewiss RE, Hoffmann B, Beaulieu Y. et al. Point-of-care ultrasound education: the increasing role of simulation and multimedia resources. J Ultrasound Med 2014; 33: 27-32 DOI: 10.7863/ultra.33.1.27. (PMID: 24371095)
- 38 Mirabel M, Celermajer D, Beraud AS. et al. Pocket-sized focused cardiac ultrasound: strengths and limitations. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 2015; 108: 197-205 DOI: 10.1016/j.acvd.2015.01.002. (PMID: 25747662)
- 39 Piscaglia FDC, Nolsoe C, Gilja OH. et al. Birth of echoscopy: The EFSUMB point of view. Ultraschall Med 2013; 34 (01) 92
- 40 Blank V, Strobel D, Karlas T. Digital Training Formats in Ultrasound Diagnostics for physicians: What options are available and how can they be successfully integrated into current DEGUM certified course concepts?. Ultraschall Med 2022; 43: 428-434 DOI: 10.1055/a-1900-8166. (PMID: 36198304)
- 41 Dietrich CF, Lucius C, Nielsen MB. et al. The ultrasound use of simulators, current view, and perspectives: Requirements and technical aspects (WFUMB state of the art paper). Endosc Ultrasound 2023; 12: 38-49 DOI: 10.4103/EUS-D-22-00197. (PMID: 36629173)
- 42 Lucius C, Koch J, Jenssen C. et al. State of the art: Simulation in der Ultraschallausbildung. Z Gastroenterol 2023; DOI: 10.1055/a-2183-1888.
- 43 Lucius C, Nielsen MB, Blaivas M. et al. The use of simulation in medical ultrasound: Current perspectives on applications and practical implementation (WFUMB state-of-the-art paper). Endosc Ultrasound 2023; 12: 311-318 DOI: 10.1097/eus.0000000000000022. (PMID: 37693111)
- 44 Bahner DP, Hughes D, Royall NA. I-AIM: a novel model for teaching and performing focused sonography. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 295-300 DOI: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.2.295. (PMID: 22298874)
- 45 Hohne E, Recker F, Dietrich CF. et al. Assessment Methods in Medical Ultrasound Education. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9: 871957 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.871957. (PMID: 35755059)
- 46 Neubauer R, Bauer CN, Dietrich CF. et al. Evidence-based ultrasound education? - An analysis of undergraduate ultrasound training studies. UIO 2024 (in press).
- 47 Lucius C, Koch JBH, Jenssen C. et al. State of the art: Simulation in der Ultraschallausbildung [State of the art: Simulation in US]. Z Gastroenterol 2024, in press.