Download PDF
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2013; 81(9): 482-492
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1350452
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Neuropsychologische Frühdiagnostik nach einem Schlaganfall – ein Überblick im deutschsprachigen Raum verfügbarer Instrumente und Vorstellung eines neuen Screening-Verfahrens

Neuropsychological Assessment Early after Stroke – An Overview of Diagnostic Instruments Available in German and Introduction of a New Screening Tool
S. Kaesberg
1   Institut für Gerontologie & Center für Neuropsychologische Diagnostik und Intervention (CeNDI), Universität Vechta
2   Kognitive Neurowissenschaften, Institut für Neurowissenschaften und Medizin (INM-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich
3   Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Uniklinik Köln
,
G. R. Fink
2   Kognitive Neurowissenschaften, Institut für Neurowissenschaften und Medizin (INM-3), Forschungszentrum Jülich
3   Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Uniklinik Köln
,
E. Kalbe
1   Institut für Gerontologie & Center für Neuropsychologische Diagnostik und Intervention (CeNDI), Universität Vechta
3   Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie, Uniklinik Köln
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 August 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Schlaganfall-induzierte neuropsychologische Einschränkungen stellen häufige und für die Prognose relevante Symptome dar, sodass ihre Diagnostik zum frühestmöglichen Zeitpunkt indiziert ist. Da Schlaganfall-Patienten in der Akut- und Subakutphase eines Schlaganfalls oft verlangsamt und vermindert belastbar sind, ist eine neuropsychologische Untersuchung häufig nur eingeschränkt und mit Instrumenten möglich, die an der Bettkante durchführbar und möglichst für diese Patientengruppe normiert sind. Hier wird ein Überblick über aktuell im deutschsprachigen Raum verfügbare neuropsychologische, diagnostische Instrumente gegeben, die für Schlaganfall-Patienten in frühen Schlaganfall- und Rehabilitations-Phasen entwickelt wurden oder bei diesen angewendet werden. Eines der neun hier vorgestellten Verfahren ist das neu entwickelte Kölner Neuropsychologische Screening für Schlaganfall-Patienten, das kurz vorgestellt wird. Die Verfahren unterscheiden sich deutlich in Form der Untersuchung, Bearbeitungsdauer, Materialaufwand und Normierung. Die Wahl des Verfahrens im klinischen und wissenschaftlichen Kontext hängt maßgeblich von der aktuellen Fragestellung sowie der Belastbarkeit des Patienten ab.

Abstract

Stroke-induced neuropsychological sequelae are frequent and highly relevant for the patient’s prognosis, so that their diagnostic assessment at an early point in time is highly advisable to allow for the initiation of appropriate treatment. Because stroke patients in the acute and sub-acute phase of a stroke often show a general slowing and restricted resilience, investigation may be limited and is often only manageable by means of instruments that can be used at bedside. Preferably such neuropsychological tests should also be normalised for the target group. An overview of the neuropsychological instruments available in German, which were developed for or applied to stroke patients in the early phases of stroke and rehabilitation, is provided here. One of the nine instruments presented is the newly developed Cologne Neuropsychological Screening for Stroke Patients (German: Kölner Neuropsychologisches Screening für Schlaganfall-Patienten), which is introduced here. The instruments differ in form of investigation, duration, material volume and standardisation. The choice of a particular instrument in a given clinical or scientific context explicitly depends on the diagnostic goal as well as the resilience of the patient.

Schlüsselwörter

Neuropsychologie - Schlaganfall - Diagnostik - Kognition - Affekt - Rehabilitation

Key words

neuropsychology - stroke - diagnostics - cognition - affect - rehabilitation
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Heuschmann PU, Busse O, Wagner M et al. Schlaganfallhäufigkeit und Versorgung von Schlaganfallpatienten in Deutschland. Aktuelle Neurologie 2009; 37: 333-340
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Weimar C, Diener HC. Diagnose und Therapie der Schlaganfallbehandlung in Deutschland. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2003; 100: A2576-A2582
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Riepe MW, Riss S, Bittner D et al. Screening for cognitive impairment in patients with acute stroke. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 2004; 17: 49-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Nys GMS, van Zandvoort MJE, de Kort PLM et al. Cognitive disorders in acute stroke: Prevalence and clinical determinants. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2007; 23: 408-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Münte TF. Neuropsychologische Defizite bei zerebrovaskulären Erkrankungen. In: Sturm W, Herrmann M, Münte TF. et al. Lehrbuch der Klinischen Neuropsychologie. Heidelberg: Spektrum; 2009: 740-750
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindemann E. Functional recovery after stroke: A review of current developments in stroke rehabilitation research. Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials 2006; 1: 75-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kertesz A. Neurobiological aspects of recovery from aphasia in stroke. International Rehabilitation Medicine 1984; 6: 122-127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A et al. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain 2006; 129: 1371-1384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Saur D, Hartwigsen G. Neurobiology of language recovery after stroke: Lessons from neuroimaging studies. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2012; 93 (Suppl. 01) S15-S25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chechlacz M, Rothstein P, Roberts KL et al. The prognosis of allocentric and egocentric neglect: Evidence from clinical scans. PLoS ONE 2012; 7 (11) e47821
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Cantagallo A, Maini M, Rumiati RI. The cognitive rehabilitation of limb apraxia in patients with stroke. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation: An International Journal 2012; 22 (03) 473-488
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Nys GMS, van Zandvoort MJE, van der Worp HB et al. Early cognitive impairment predicts long-term depressive symptoms and quality of life after stroke. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2006; 247: 149-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Pasquini M, Ley D, Rousseaux M et al. Influence of cognitive impairment on the institutionalisation rate three years after stroke. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 2007; 78: 56-59
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Donkervoort M, Dekker J, Deelman BG. The course of apraxia and ADL functioning in left hemisphere stroke patients treated in rehabilitation centres and nursing homes. Clinical Rehabilitation 2006; 20: 1085-1093
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Leśniak M, Bak T, Czepiel W et al. Frequency and prognostic value of cognitive disorders in stroke patients. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 2008; 26: 356-363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Patel M, Coshall C, Rudd AG et al. Natural history of cognitive impairment after stroke and factors associated with its recovery. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003; 17: 158-166
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y et al. Cognitive impairment after stroke: Frequency, patterns and relationship of functional abilities. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 1994; 57: 202-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Chronic Care Networks for Alzheimer’s Disease Initiative. Tools for early identification, assessment and treatment for people with Alzheimer’s Disease and dementia. Im Internet: www.alz.org; Stand 19.10.2012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik und Nervenheilkunde (DGPPN) & Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie (DGN). S3-Leitlinie „Demenzen”. Im Internet: www.dgn.org; Stand 25.10.2012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dubois B, Burn D, Goetz C et al. Diagnostic procedures for Parkinson’s Disease Dementia: Recommendations from the movement disorder society task force. Movement Disorders 2007; 22: 2314-2324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Goetz CG, Emre M, Dubois B. Parkinson’s Disease Dementia: Definitions, guidelines, and research perspectives in diagnosis. Annals of Neurology 2008; 64 (Suppl. 02) S81-S92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Litvan I, Goldman JG, Tröster AI et al. Diagnostic criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson’s Disease: Movement Disorder Society Task Force Guidelines. Movement Disorders 2012; 27 (03) 349-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Engel C, Greim B, Zettl UK. Diagnostics of cognitive dysfunctions in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology 2007; 254 (Suppl. 02) II30-II34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sartori E, Edan G. Assessment of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2006; 245: 169-175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L et al. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient. Stroke 2010; 41: 2402-2448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation (BAR). Empfehlungen zur Neurologischen Rehabilitation von Patienten mit schweren und schwersten Hirnschädigungen in den Phasen B und C. Frankfurt: Bundesarbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation 1999;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ackermann H, Schönle PW. Multiprofessionelle neurologische Rehabilitation – Leitlinien für die Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurologie. In: Diener HC, Weimar C. (Hrsg) Leitlinien für Diagnostik und Therapie in der Neurologie – Herausgegeben von der Kommission „Leitlinien“ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurologie. Stuttgart: Thieme Verlag; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 28 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Methodology Manual for ACCF/AHA Guideline Writing Committees: Methodologies and policies from the ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Im Internet: www.americanheart.org; Stand 15.11.2012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Busse O. Stroke Units und neurologische Intensivstationen: Ein Meilenstein zur Verbesserung der Behandlungserfolge bei Schlaganfallpatienten. Intensiv 2001; 9: 159-163
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Liebetrau M, Hamann GF. Akuttherapie des Schlaganfalls – Stroke Units ermöglichen die Implementierung von Qualitätsstandards. Klinikarzt 2008; 27 (06) 290-295
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lees R, Fearon P, Harrison JK et al. Cognitive and mood assessment in stroke research: Focused review of contemporary studies. Stroke 2012; 43: 1678-1680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Kaesberg S, Kalbe E, Finis J et al. Kölner Neuropsychologisches Screening für Schlaganfall-Patienten (KöpSS). Göttingen: Hogrefe ; 2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-Mental-State: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975; 12: 189-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kessler J, Markowitsch HJ, Denzler P. Der Mini-Mental-Status Test. Weinheim: Beltz Test ; 1990
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Arciniegas DB, Kellermey GF, Bonifer NM et al. Screening for cognitive decline following stroke using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011; 7: 189-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Blake H, McKinney M, Treece K et al. An evaluation of screening measures for cognitive impairment after stroke. Age and Ageing 2002; 31: 451-456
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Bour A, Rasquin S, Boreas A et al. How predictive is the MMSE for cognitive performance after stroke?. Journal of Neurology 2010; 257: 630-637
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Kaufman AS, Kaufman NL. K-SNAP: Kaufman Short Neuropsychological Assessment Procedure. Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments 1994
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Melchers P, Schürmann S. Kaufman – Neuropsychologischer Kurztest. Frankfurt: Pearson Assessments ; 2004
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Peschke V. Neuropsychologische Diagnostik und Datenbanksystem für die Früh- und Weiterführende Rehabilitation. Handanweisung Burgauer Bedside Screening 2004; Im Internet: www.psydat.de; 15.11.2012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Nasreddine ZS, Collin I, Chertkow H et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for detection of mild cognitive deficits. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 2003; 30 (02) 30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Bartusch S, Zipper S. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). deutsche Übersetzung 2004; Im Internet: www.mocatest.org; 15.11.2012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Nasreddine ZS, Philips NA, Bédirian V et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): A brief screening tool for Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2005; 53: 695-699
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Costa AS, Fimm B, Friesen P et al. Alternate-form reliability of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment screening test in a clinical setting. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders 2012; 33 (06) 379-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Dong Y, Sharma VK, Chan BP et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of vascular cognitive impairment after acute stroke. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 2010; 299 (01) 15-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Godefroy O, Fickl A, Roussel M et al. Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination to detect poststroke cognitive impairment? A study with neuropsychological evaluation. Stroke 2011; 42: 1712-1716
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Toglia J, Fitzgerald KA, O’Dell MW et al. The Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment in persons with mild subacute stroke: Relationship to functional outcome. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2011; 92: 792-798
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Thilmann A, Nachtmann A, Scharff A. Neurologischer Reha-Score – Eine Skala zur Messung des Patientenzustandes und Aufwandes in der neurologischen Rehabilitation. Nervenarzt 2006; 77: 1456-1463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Grimm C. Kurztest zur Erfassung kognitiver Leistungen (KKL): Erste Normierung und Validierung (Dissertation). München: Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München ; 2008
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale 1989; Im Internet: www.ninds.nih.gov; 15.11.2012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Institut für Epidemiologie und Sozialmedizin, Westfälische Wilhelm-Universität Münster. National Institute of Health Schlaganfall-Skala. Deutsche Fassung der National Institute of Health Stroke Scale 1998; Im Internet: www.aneurysmen.at; 15.11.2012
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Brott TG, Adams HP, Olinger CP et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864-870
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Berger K, Weltermann B, Kolominsky-Rabas P et al. Untersuchung zur Reliabilität von Schlaganfallskalen – Die deutschen Versionen von NIHSS, ESS und Rankin Scale. Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie 1999; 67 (02) 81-86
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Lyden P, Claesson L, Havstad S et al. Factor analysis of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale in patients with large strokes. Archives of Neurology 2004; 61: 1677-1680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM et al. The Stroke Impact Scale Version 2.0: Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 1999; 30: 2131-2140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Geyh S, Cieza A, Stucki G. Evaluation of the German translation of the Stroke Impact Scale using Rasch analysis. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2009; 23 (06) 978-995
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Duncan PW, Bode RK, Lai SM et al. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: The Stroke Impact Scale. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2003; 84: 950-963
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Duncan PW, Wallace D, Studenski S et al. Conceptualization of a new stroke-specific outcome measure: The Stroke Impact Ccale. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2001; 8 (02) 19-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Packwood S, Hodgetts HM, Tremblay S. A multiperspective approach to the conceptualization of executive functions. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 2011; 33 (04) 456-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Barker-Collo S, Feigin V. The impact of neuropsychological deficits on functional stroke outcomes. Neuropsychological Review 2006; 16: 53-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Gottesmann RF, Hillis AE. Predictors and assessment of cognitive dysfunction resulting from ischaemic stroke. Lancet Neurology 2010; 9: 895-905
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Lissi M, Bisiacchi PS. Mini Mental State Examination and Brief Neuropsychological Examination as neuropsychological screening tools. Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia 2012; 34 (01) A51-A56
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Nys GMS, van Zandvoort MJE, de Kort PLM et al. Restrictions of the Mini-Mental State Examination in acute stroke. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2005; 20: 623-629
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Fink GR. Kurz und gut – oder doch nur „quick and dirty“?. Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie 2013; 81 (04) 187
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Aggarwal A, Kean E. Comparison of the Folstein Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) as a cognitive screening tool in an inpatient rehabilitation setting. Neuroscience & Medicine 2010; 1: 39-42
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Nøkleby K, Boland E, Bergersen H et al. Screening for cognitive deficits after stroke: A comparison of three screening tools. Clinical Rehabilitation 2008; 22: 1095-1104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Sodring KM, Laake K, Sveen U et al. Validation of the screening instrument for neuropsychological impairment in stroke. Physiotherapy Research International 1998; 3 (01) 15-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Doyle PJ, McNeil MR, Mikolic JM et al. The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provides valid and reliable score estimates of functioning and well-being in stroke survivors with and without communication disorders. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2004; 57: 997-1007
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar