A survey of gundog lameness and injuries in Great Britain in the shooting seasons 2005/2006 and 2006/2007

Summary

The aim of this paper was to record the types of injuries and causes of lameness exhibited by dogs involved in game shooting. The study investigated gundogs that worked in the seasons 2005/2006 and 2006/2007. Information was acquired by owner questionnaires. The dogs were classified as working in the beating line, as peg dogs or as picking up dogs. A further group comprised Setters and Pointers that worked the grouse moors. A secondary objective was to assess the incidence of injuries that were treated by owners without seeking the assistance of their veterinarian, and to identify those that may have been underestimated. Depending on whether a dog was injured or went lame, and, if so, the nature of the injury, was correlated with the number of days worked, where it worked, its breed and the type of work it did. A mildly positive association between the Spaniel breed group and injuries was seen in 2005/2006 but not in 2006/2007. However, the relationship between the type of work and injuries was very significant for both seasons with dogs working in the beating line being at greatest risk and Setters and Pointers having the least number of injuries. The dogs in the beating line were also at a significantly greater risk of injury in both years when the type of injury was investigated. Fifty-three percent of all injuries were deemed to be sufficiently minor, that veterinary attention was not sought. However, those dogs with proximal thoracic limb lameness may have been under-investigated. There was a highly significant association between tail injuries and undocked Springer and Cocker Spaniels.

Keywords

Gundogs - injuries - lameness - Great Britain

• References

• 1 www.basc.org.uk. Last accessed 07/03/2008.
• 2 www.nobs.org.uk. Last accessed 07/03/2008.
• 3 Darke PGG, Thrusfield MV, Aitken CGG. Association between tail injuries and docking in dogs.. Vet Rec 1985; 116: 409.
• 4 Agnew BP. The nature and incidence of Greyhound racing injuries.. FRCVS Thesis, Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. 1989 34-47.
• 5 Bardet JF. Shoulder diseases in dogs.. Vet Med 2002; 10: 909-918.
• 6 Cook JL, Renfro DC, Tomlinson JL. et al. Measurement of angles of abduction for diagnosis of shoulder instability in dogs using goniometry and digital image analysis.. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 463-468.
• 7 Cogar SM, Cook CR, Curry SL. et al. Prospective evaluation of techniques for differentiating shoulder pathology as a source of forelimb lameness in medium and large breed dogs.. Vet Surg 2008; 37: 132-142.
• 8 Whitehair JG, Vasseur PB, Willits NH. Epidemiology of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1993; 203: 1016-1019.
• 9 de Rooster H, de Bruin T, van Bree H. Morphologic and functional features of the canine cruciate ligaments.. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 769-790.
• 10 Johnson JM, Johnson AL. Cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and postoperative rehabilitation.. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1993; 23: 717-733.
• 11 Doverspike M, Vasseur PB, Harb MF. et al. Contralateral cranial cruciate ligament rupture: incidence in 114 dogs.. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1993; 29: 167-170.
• 12 Duval JM, Budsberg SC, Flo GL. et al. Breed, sex, and body weight as risk factors for rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in young dogs.. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 215: 811-814.
• 13 Bennett D, Tennant B, Lewis DG. et al. reappraisal of anterior cruciate ligament disease in the dog.. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 29: 275-297.