Endoscopy 2020; 52(S 01): S33
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1704107
ESGE Days 2020 oral presentations
Saturday, April 25, 2020 11:00 – 13:00 Advances in endoluminal endoscopy Liffey Meeting Room 2
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

DEVELOPMENT AND CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ENDOCYTOSCOPY SCORING SYSTEM OF DYSPLASIA IN THE BARRETT’S ESOPHAGUS: PRELIMINARY RESULTS

JJH van der Laan
1   University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groningen, Netherlands
,
X Zhao
1   University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groningen, Netherlands
,
I Schmidt
1   University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groningen, Netherlands
,
RY Gabriëls
1   University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groningen, Netherlands
,
A Karrenbeld
2   University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Pathology, Groningen, Netherlands
,
FTM Peters
1   University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groningen, Netherlands
,
J Westerhof
1   University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groningen, Netherlands
,
WB Nagengast
1   University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groningen, Netherlands
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 April 2020 (online)

 
 

    Aims To evaluate the diagnostic capability of endocytoscopy (ECS) [model GIF-H290 EC, Olympus] in detecting dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus (BE).

    Methods For each procedure, the BE segment was at first evaluated for lesion localization by high definition-white light endoscopy. This was followed by further tissue characterization by assessment of the vascular network through magnifying narrow band imaging. Then the tissue of interest was rinsed with approximately 8 ml N-acetylcysteine, prior to spraying the staining mixture of 0.05% crystal violet (10ml) and 1% methylene blue (1ml). After 90 seconds of absorption time, ECS was performed to assess architectural and cytological features of the tissue. A comparable procedure was conducted ex vivo for imaging the EMR specimens.

    Results This on-going study of ECS in BE patients included at the moment 30 patients. We imaged 43 sites with ECS, of which we have 32 targeted biopsies containing all stages of dysplasia in BE. Imaging was considered to be classifiable in 56% (n=24) and unclassifiable in 44% (n=19). Nevertheless, poor resolution of images (51%) due to patient-related factors and low quality of staining (56%) often made it hard to interpret in vivo ECS images. Overall, we are able to classify images into three categories including BE without dysplasia, BE with dysplasia and EAC in vivo and ex vivo.

    Conclusions The ECS could provide clear images in which distinct architectural and cytological features could be identified. However, certain patient-related as well as procedure-related factors can trouble clear ECS imaging and thus diagnoses in BE patients. In order to implement ECS into clinical practice, we will build an in vivo atlas with representative images of each category and investigate the use of an artificial intelligence-aided diagnostic system that could help to enable a highly accurate diagnosis.


    #