Endoscopy 2020; 52(S 01): S39
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1704122
ESGE Days 2020 oral presentations
Thursday, April 23, 2020 08:30 – 10:00 Take a pill Wicklow Meeting Room 3
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

IS IT WORTH REPEATING CAPSULE ENDOSCOPY (CE) IN SUSPECTED SMALL BOWEL BLEEDING?

S Sihag
1   Tallaght University Hospital, Gastroenterology, Dublin, Ireland
2   Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
,
E McCarthy
1   Tallaght University Hospital, Gastroenterology, Dublin, Ireland
2   Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
,
S Semenov
1   Tallaght University Hospital, Gastroenterology, Dublin, Ireland
2   Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
,
M Syafiq Ismail
1   Tallaght University Hospital, Gastroenterology, Dublin, Ireland
2   Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
,
D Molloy
1   Tallaght University Hospital, Gastroenterology, Dublin, Ireland
2   Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
,
B Ryan
1   Tallaght University Hospital, Gastroenterology, Dublin, Ireland
,
A O’Connor
1   Tallaght University Hospital, Gastroenterology, Dublin, Ireland
2   Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
,
N Breslin
1   Tallaght University Hospital, Gastroenterology, Dublin, Ireland
,
D McNamara
1   Tallaght University Hospital, Gastroenterology, Dublin, Ireland
2   Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 April 2020 (online)

 
 

    Aims Repeat CE procedures over 9 years for a suspicion of ongoing SB bleeding were identified from a database. Patient demographics, CE findings and additional investigations were recorded. Potential factors associated with improved yields were explored.

    Methods Repeat CE procedures over 9 years for a suspicion of ongoing SB bleeding were identified from a database. Patient demographics, CE findings and additional investigations were recorded. Potential factors associated with improved yields were explored.

    Results 339/3,735 (9%) had >1 CE. 152/339 (46%) for bleeding, male 86/152 (57%), mean age 63.9, range 18-92 years, mean CE interval was 461 days (1 - 2576). Haemoglobin (Hb) was available in 81 (52%), low in 65 (80%), mean 11.1.

    1stCE findings: normal 19 (13%), angiodysplasia 24 (16%), active bleeding of unclear origin 30 (20%), inflammation 20 (13%), gastric abnormality 20 (13%), incomplete/retained CE 33 (22%), other 6 (4%). 2ndCE completion rate was 96% (n=146) and overall yield was 55% (n=83). Positive or negative index CE did not influence the diagnostic yield of subsequent CE, 8/19 (42%) normal vs 75/133 (56%) abnormal, p =0.1. Patients with active bleeding or angiodysplasia were almost 3 times more likely to have a positive 2ndCE (OR = 2.8, p = 0.004, 95%CI 1.3 to 5.6). Older patients (>70) were also more likely to have a positive 2ndCE, OR 2.3, p=0.01, 95%CI 1.17 to 4.45. Subjects with index retained/incomplete CE were more likely to have a subsequent incomplete study, OR 7, p = 0.01, 95%CI 1.55 to 30.62.

    Conclusions Second look CE in obscure bleeding can be an effective clinical tool with a diagnostic yield of 55%. Along with clinical suspicion, older age and initial small bowel bleeding/vascular lesion are predictive of higher yield.


    #