Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2023; 27(03): 245-255
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1767766
Review Article

Don't Miss Me: Midfoot Sprains, A Point-of-Care Review

1   Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (AUMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
2   Academic Center for Evidence-based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
3   Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), Amsterdam Movement Sciences (AMS), Amsterdam Institute Sport Sciences (AISS), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Enrique A. Espinosa Hernández
1   Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (AUMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
2   Academic Center for Evidence-based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
3   Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), Amsterdam Movement Sciences (AMS), Amsterdam Institute Sport Sciences (AISS), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Prof. dr. Gino M.M.J. Kerkhoffs
4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (AUMC), Academic Center for Evidence-based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
5   Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), The Netherlands Amsterdam Movement Sciences (AMS), Amsterdam Institute Sport Sciences (AISS), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Simon Goedegebuure
4   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (AUMC), Academic Center for Evidence-based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
5   Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), The Netherlands Amsterdam Movement Sciences (AMS), Amsterdam Institute Sport Sciences (AISS), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Frank F. Smithuis
1   Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (AUMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
2   Academic Center for Evidence-based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
3   Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), Amsterdam Movement Sciences (AMS), Amsterdam Institute Sport Sciences (AISS), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
,
Prof. dr. Mario Maas
1   Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (AUMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
2   Academic Center for Evidence-based Sports Medicine (ACES), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
3   Amsterdam Collaboration for Health and Safety in Sports (ACHSS), Amsterdam Movement Sciences (AMS), Amsterdam Institute Sport Sciences (AISS), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Athletes practicing high-contact sports are exposed to an increased risk of midfoot injuries, namely midtarsal sprains. The complexity of reaching an accurate diagnosis is clearly depicted in the reported incidence of midtarsal sprains, ranging from 5% to 33% of ankle inversion injuries. Because the focus of the treating physician and physical therapist is on lateral stabilizing structures, midtarsal sprains are missed at initial evaluation in up to 41% of patients, with delayed treatment as a result.

Detecting acute midtarsal sprains requires a high degree of clinical awareness. Radiologists must become familiar with the characteristic imaging findings of normal and pathologic midfoot anatomy to avoid adverse outcomes such as pain and instability. In this article we describe Chopart joint anatomy, mechanisms of midtarsal sprains, clinical importance, and key imaging findings with a focus on magnetic resonance imaging. A team effort is essential to provide optimal care for the injured athlete.



Publication History

Article published online:
25 May 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Main BJ, Jowett RL. Injuries of the midtarsal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1975; 57 (01) 89-97
  • 2 Søndergaard L, Konradsen L, Hølmer P, Jørgensen LN, Nielsen PT. Acute midtarsal sprains: frequency and course of recovery. Foot Ankle Int 1996; 17 (04) 195-199
  • 3 Broström L. Sprained ankles. 3. Clinical observations in recent ligament ruptures. Acta Chir Scand 1965; 130 (06) 560-569
  • 4 van Dorp KB, de Vries MR, van der Elst M, Schepers T. Chopart joint injury: a study of outcome and morbidity. J Foot Ankle Surg 2010; 49 (06) 541-545
  • 5 Durall CJ. Examination and treatment of cuboid syndrome: a literature review. Sports Health 2011; 3 (06) 514-519
  • 6 Sarrafian SK. Biomechanics of the subtalar joint complex. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (290) 17-26
  • 7 Walter WR, Hirschmann A, Alaia EF, Tafur M, Rosenberg ZS. Normal anatomy and traumatic injury of the midtarsal (Chopart) joint complex: an imaging primer. Radiographics 2019; 39 (01) 136-152
  • 8 Walter WR, Hirschmann A, Tafur M, Rosenberg ZS. Imaging of Chopart (midtarsal) joint complex: normal anatomy and posttraumatic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211 (02) 416-425
  • 9 Dorn-Lange NV, Nauck T, Lohrer H, Arentz S, Konerding MA. Morphology of the dorsal and lateral calcaneocuboid ligaments. Foot Ankle Int 2008; 29 (09) 942-949
  • 10 Walter WR, Hirschmann A, Alaia EF, Garwood ER, Rosenberg ZS. Journal Club: MRI evaluation of midtarsal (Chopart) sprain in the setting of acute ankle injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 210 (02) 386-395
  • 11 Lee SW, Kim DD, Buskanets A, Oh-Park M. Midtarsal sprain misdiagnosed as ankle sprain: role of ultrasonography in diagnosis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2016; 95 (03) e44-e45
  • 12 Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, Hertel J, Ryan J, Bleakley C. The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Med 2014; 44 (01) 123-140
  • 13 Wilson Jr LS, Mizel MS, Michelson JD. Foot and ankle injuries in motor vehicle accidents. Foot Ankle Int 2001; 22 (08) 649-652 Published correction appears in Foot Ankle Int 2001;22(9):705
  • 14 Hermel MB, Gershon-Cohen J. The nutcracker fracture of the cuboid by indirect violence. Radiology 1953; 60 (06) 850-854
  • 15 Andermahr J, Helling HJ, Maintz D, Mönig S, Koebke J, Rehm KE. The injury of the calcaneocuboid ligaments. Foot Ankle Int 2000; 21 (05) 379-384
  • 16 Lohrer H, Nauck T, Arentz S, Vogl TJ. Dorsal calcaneocuboid ligament versus lateral ankle ligament repair: a case-control study. Br J Sports Med 2006; 40 (10) 839-843
  • 17 Lohrer H, Nauck T. Augmented periosteal flap repair of the chronically unstable calcaneocuboid joint. A series of six cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (07) 1596-1601
  • 18 Golanó P, Vega J, de Leeuw PA. et al. Anatomy of the ankle ligaments: a pictorial essay. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016; 24 (04) 944-956
  • 19 Hirschmann MT, Friederich NF, Müller C. Anatomic reconstruction of a chronically unstable calcaneocuboid joint with augmented extensor digitorum brevis muscle flap: a new method. Foot Ankle Int 2008; 29 (12) 1258-1261
  • 20 Rios AM, Rosenberg ZS, Bencardino JT, Rodrigo SP, Theran SG. Bone marrow edema patterns in the ankle and hindfoot: distinguishing MRI features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197 (04) W720–W729
  • 21 Polzer H, Kanz KG, Prall WC. et al. Diagnosis and treatment of acute ankle injuries: development of an evidence-based algorithm. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2012; 4 (01) e5
  • 22 Weishaupt D, Schweitzer ME. MR imaging of the foot and ankle: patterns of bone marrow signal abnormalities. Eur Radiol 2002; 12 (02) 416-426
  • 23 Rosenberg ZS, Beltran J, Bencardino JT. From the RSNA refresher courses, Radiological Society of North America: MR imaging of the ankle and foot. Radiographics 2000; 20 (Spec No): S153-S179
  • 24 Ly TV, Coetzee JC. Treatment of primarily ligamentous Lisfranc joint injuries: primary arthrodesis compared with open reduction and internal fixation. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88 (03) 514-520
  • 25 Melão L, Canella C, Weber M, Negrão P, Trudell D, Resnick D. Ligaments of the transverse tarsal joint complex: MRI-anatomic correlation in cadavers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193 (03) 662-671
  • 26 Hollander JD, Lidtke RH, Lai JY. The labrum of the calcaneocuboid joint. J Foot Ankle Surg 1998; 37 (04) 308-312
  • 27 Foti G, Catania M, Caia S. et al. Identification of bone marrow edema of the ankle: diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy CT in comparison with MRI. Radiol Med (Torino) 2019; 124 (10) 1028-1036
  • 28 Gosangi B, Mandell JC, Weaver MJ. et al. Bone marrow edema at dual-energy CT: a game changer in the emergency department. Radiographics 2020; 40 (03) 859-874
  • 29 Petrover D, Schweitzer ME, Laredo JD. Anterior process calcaneal fractures: a systematic evaluation of associated conditions. Skeletal Radiol 2007; 36 (07) 627-632
  • 30 Norfray JF, Rogers LF, Adamo GP, Groves HC, Heiser WJ. Common calcaneal avulsion fracture. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1980; 134 (01) 119-123
  • 31 Bhimani R, Sornsakrin P, Ashkani-Esfahani S. et al. Using area and volume measurement via weightbearing CT to detect Lisfranc instability. J Orthop Res 2021; 39 (11) 2497-2505
  • 32 Haapamaki VV, Kiuru MJ, Koskinen SK. Ankle and foot injuries: analysis of MDCT findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183 (03) 615-622
  • 33 Sconfienza LM, Orlandi D, Lacelli F, Serafini G, Silvestri E. Dynamic high-resolution US of ankle and midfoot ligaments: normal anatomic structure and imaging technique. Radiographics 2015; 35 (01) 164-178
  • 34 Thiounn A, Szymanski C, Lalanne C, Soudy K, Demondion X, Maynou C. Prospective observational study of midtarsal joint sprain: epidemiological and ultrasonographic analysis. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2016; 102 (05) 657-661
  • 35 Kutaish H, Stern R, Drittenbass L, Assal M. Injuries to the Chopart joint complex: a current review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2017; 27 (04) 425-431
  • 36 Richter M, Wippermann B, Krettek C, Schratt HE, Hufner T, Therman H. Fractures and fracture dislocations of the midfoot: occurrence, causes and long-term results. Foot Ankle Int 2001; 22 (05) 392-398
  • 37 Rammelt S, Schepers T. Chopart injuries: when to fix and when to fuse?. Foot Ankle Clin 2017; 22 (01) 163-180
  • 38 Harris AP, Johnson J, Waryasz GR. Isolated dorsal dislocations of the talonavicular and calcaneocuboid articulations (Chopart joints) from a low-energy mechanism. Am J Emerg Med 2016; 34 (08) 1733.e1-1733.e4
  • 39 Nunley JA, Vertullo CJ. Classification, investigation, and management of midfoot sprains: Lisfranc injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (06) 871-878
  • 40 Trevino SG, Kodros S. Controversies in tarsometatarsal injuries. Orthop Clin North Am 1995; 26 (02) 229-238
  • 41 Burroughs KE, Reimer CD, Fields KB. Lisfranc injury of the foot: a commonly missed diagnosis. Am Fam Physician 1998; 58 (01) 118-124