Seminars in Neurosurgery 2000; 11(1): 51-58
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-11557
Copyright © 2000 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Tel.: +1(212) 584-4662

USE OF POSTOPERATIVE ANGIOGRAPHY IN CEREBRAL ANEURYSM SURGERY

Carlos A. David, Eric W. Nottmeier
  • University of Missouri Health Sciences Center, Division of Neurosurgery, Columbia, Missouri.
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 December 2000 (online)

 

ABSTRACT

The routine use of postoperative angiography for cerebral aneurysms is a matter of ongoing debate. The information obtained through postoperative angiography includes the adequacy of clipping, the existence of unexpected major vessel occlusion, and previously unidentified aneurysms. The incidence of these occurrences has been estimated to range from 3.5 to 18% and from 0.3 to 11.5%. In view of this many neurosurgeons feel postoperative angiography is warranted in all cases. Others argue that the information will not change the management and is not necessary. Several authors have attempted to identify factors that would predict a more selective need for postoperative angiography; however, no consensus has yet been reached.

In addition to immediate postoperative angiography, some advocate late follow-up angiography. There exist few data regarding the long-term follow-up of surgically treated aneurysms. This article will review the available data and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of postoperative angiography in aneurysm surgery. Particular emphasis will be placed on the use of routine postoperative angiography and the usefulness of late angiographic follow-up of aneurysm patients.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Allcock J M, Drake C G. Postoperative angiography in cases of ruptured cerebral aneurysm.  J Neurosurg . 1963;  20 752-759
  • 2 Drake C G, Allcock J M. Postoperative angiography and the ``slipped'' clip.  J Neurosurg . 1973;  39 683-689
  • 3 Derdeyn C P, Moran C J, Cross D T, Sherburn E W, Dacey R G. Intracranial aneurysm: Anatomic factors that predict the usefulness of intraoperative angiography.  Radiology . 1997;  205 335-339
  • 4 Kallmes D F, Kallmes M H, Lanzino G, Kassell N F, Jensen M E, Helm G A. Routine angiography after surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A cost versus benefit analysis.  Neurosurgery . 1997;  41 629-641
  • 5 Alexander T D, Macdonald R L, Weir B, Kowalczuk A. Intraoperative angiography in cerebral aneurysm surgery: A prospective study of 100 craniotomies.  Neurosurgery . 1996;  39 10-18
  • 6 MacDonald R L, Wallace C, Kestle J RW. Role of angiography following aneurysm surgery.  J Neurosurg . 1993;  79 826-832
  • 7 Origitano T C, Schwartz K, Anderson D, Azar-Kia B, Reichman O H. Optimal clip application and intraoperative angiography for intracranial aneurysms.  Surg Neurol . 1999;  51 117-128
  • 8 Rauzzino M J, Quinn C M, Fisher III S W. Angiography after aneurysm surgery: Indications for selective angiography.  Surg Neurol . 1998;  49 32-41
  • 9 Vajda J. Postoperative angiography (letter to editor).  J Neurosurg . 1995;  82 148
  • 10 Feuerberg I, Lindquist C, Lindquist M, Steiner L. Natural history of postoperative aneurysm rests.  J Neurosurg . 1987;  66 30-34
  • 11 Sato S, Suzuki J. Prognosis in cases of intracranial aneurysm after incomplete direct operations.  Acta Neurochiruriga . 1971;  24 245-252
  • 12 Lin T, Fox A J, Drake C G. Regrowth of aneurysm sacs from residual neck following aneurysm clipping.  J Neurosurg . 1989;  70 556-560
  • 13 Samson D S, Hodosh R M, Reid W R, Beyer C W, Clark W K. Risk of intracranial aneurysm surgery in the good grade patient: Early versus late operation.  Neurosurgery . 1979;  5 422-426
  • 14 Proust F, Hannequin D, Langlois O, Freger P, Creissard P. Causes of morbidity and mortality after ruptured aneurysm surgery in a series of 230 patients: The importance of control angiography.  Stroke . 1995;  26 1553-1557
  • 15 David C, Vishteh A G, Spetzler R F, Lemole M, Lawton M T, Partovi S. Late angiographic follow-up review of surgically treated aneurysms.  J Neurosurg . 1999;  91 396-4011
    >