Download PDF
Sprache · Stimme · Gehör 2021; 45(04): 179-184
DOI: 10.1055/a-1557-8377
Schwerpunktthema

Semantische Demenz: Sprache und Kommunikation in einem Fallbeispiel

Language and Communication in Semantic Dementia – a Case Study
Frank Regenbrecht
,
Danièle Pino
,
Simone Hartwig
,
Anke Marschhauser
,
Gerdi Pfüller
,
Matthias L. Schroeter
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Bei der semantischen Variante der primär progredienten Aphasie sind die Klassifikationskriterien nach Gorno-Tempini et al. ein beeinträchtigtes Benennen und Wortverstehen, gestörtes Objektwissen und Oberflächendyslexie bei intakter Grammatik/Sprechmotorik und erhaltenen Nachsprechleistungen. Dieser Beitrag beleuchtet exemplarisch Sprachdiagnostik, semantisches Leistungsprofil sowie Veränderungen von komplexer Sprache und Kommunikationsverhalten.

Abstract

As an example, a patient with a semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia is described who fully meets the classification criteria according to Gorno-Tempini et al. [1]: impaired performance in naming and word comprehension, impaired object knowledge, and surface dyslexia with largely intact grammar and speech motor skills as well as preserved repetition. The article focuses on the language assessment performed, the profile of semantic performance, and changes in complex language and communication behaviour.

Schlüsselwörter

Semantische Demenz - Sprachdiagnostik - Familiaritätseffekt - Kommunikationsverhalten

Keywords

Semantic dementia - language assessment - familiarity effect - communication behaviour


Publication History

Article published online:
30 November 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Snowden JS, Goulding PJ, Neary D. Semantic dementia: a form of circumscribed atrophy. Behavioural Neurology 1989; 2: 167-182
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bozeat S, Lambon Ralph MA, Patterson K. et al. Non-verbal semantic impairment in Semantic Dementia. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38: 1207-1215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S. et al. Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 2011; 7611: 1006-1014
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Blanken G, Döppler R, Schlenck K. Wortproduktionsprüfung. Hofheim: NAT-Verlag; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Stadie N, Cholewa J, De Bleser R. LEMO 2.0 Lexikon modellorientiert Diagnostik für Aphasie, Dyslexie und Dysgraphie. Hofheim: NAT-Verlag; 2013
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Howard D. The pyramids and palm trees test: A test of semantic access from words and pictures. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company; 1992
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Gamboz N, Coluccia E, Lavarone A. et al. Normative data for the Pyramids and Palm Trees Test in the elderly Italian population. Neurol Sci 2009; 30: 453-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hogrefe K, Glindemann R, Ziegler W, Goldenberg G. Nonverbaler Semantiktest NVST. Göttingen: Hogrefe; im Druck
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Glindemann R, Klintwort D, Ziegler W. et al. Bogenhausener Semantik Untersuchung BOSU. München: Urban & Fischer; 2002
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW. Birmingham Object Recognition Battery. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Hodges JR, Martinos M, Woollams AM. et al. Repeat and point: differentiating semantic dementia from progressive non-fluent aphasia. Cortex 2008; 44: 1265-1270
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Huber W, Poeck K, Weniger D. et al. Der Aachener-Aphasie Test AAT. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Burchert F, Lorenz A, Schröder A. et al. Sätze verstehen. Hofheim: NAT-Verlag; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Goodglass H, Kaplan E. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Liepold M, Ziegler W, Brendel B. Hierarchische Wortlisten: Ein Nachsprechtest für die Sprechapraxiediagnostik. Dortmund: Borgmann; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Patterson K, Nestor PJ, Rogers TT. Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain . Nature Rev Neurosci 2007; 8: 976-987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Bonner MF, Vesely L, Price C. et al. Reversal of the concreteness effect in semantic dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychol 2009; 26: 568-579
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ralph MAL, Jefferies E, Patterson K. et al. The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nature Rev Neurosci 2017; 18: 42-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Knels C, Danek A. Loss of word-meaning with spared object semantics in a case of mixed primary progressive aphasia. Brain and Language 2010; 1132: 96-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Robinson S, Druks J, Hodges J. et al. The treatment of object naming, definition, and object use in semantic dementia: The effectiveness of errorless learning. Aphasiology 2009; 236: 749-775
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Snowden JS, Griffiths H, Neary D. Semantic Dementia: Autobiographical contribution to preservation of meaning. Cognitive Neuropsychol 1994; 11: 265-288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Croisile B, Ska B, Brabant MJ. et al. Comparative study of oral and written picture description in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Brain and Language 1996; 531: 1-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rosen HJ, Allison SC, Ogar JM. et al. Behavioral features in semantic dementia vs other forms of progressive aphasias. Neurology 2006; 6710: 1752-1756
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar