Download PDF
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2011; 79(11): 632-641
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281733
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Tiefe Hirnstimulation bei der Schizophrenie

Deep Brain Stimulation in SchizophreniaJ. Kuhn1 [*] 1 , M. Bodatsch1 [*] 1 , V. Sturm2 , D. Lenartz2 , J. Klosterkötter1 , P. J. Uhlhaas3 , C. Winter4 , T. O. J. Gründler5
  • 1Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum der Universität Köln
  • 2Klinik für Stereotaxie und funktionelle Neurochirurgie, Klinikum der Universität Köln
  • 3Max-Planck-Institut für Hirnforschung, Frankfurt a. M.
  • 4Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus
  • 5Max-Planck-Institut für neurologische Forschung, Köln
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 November 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die tiefe Hirnstimulation (THS) hat die Grenzen der Behandlungsmöglichkeiten einiger, vermeintlich therapieresistenter, neuropsychiatrischer Erkrankungen erfolgreich erweitert. Vor diesem Hintergrund werden immer mehr psychische Störungen im Stadium der Therapieresistenz als mögliche Indikationen der THS erwogen. Mittlerweile ist auch die Schizophrenie in den Fokus des Interesses gelangt. Diese, wie alle anderen potenziellen psychiatrischen Indikationen, bedürfen der kritischen Prüfung, ob der aktuelle Wissensstand in Hinblick auf die propagierten Wirkmechanismen der THS und die angenommene Pathophysiologie der Erkrankung einen Einsatz des Verfahrens rechtfertigen. Die vorliegende Arbeit betrachtet synoptisch die aktuellen Ansätze, die einen THS-Einsatz begründen könnten, und diskutiert die Übertragbarkeit bisheriger THS-Anwendungen, Studienergebnisse zur dopaminergen Transmission und zu neuronalen Oszillationen sowie tierexperimentelle Daten. In der Zusammenschau ist die aktuelle Datenlage durchaus zukunftsweisend für einige Symptome der Schizophrenie, rechtfertigt zum gegenwärtigen Zeitpunkt jedoch womöglich noch nicht den klinischen Einsatz der THS in der Behandlung. Vordringliche Aufgabe ist der Schluss bis dato bestehender Wissenslücken, um indikationsbegründende Hypothesen mit möglichst geringem Spekulationscharakter generieren zu können.

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has successfully advanced our treatment options for putative therapy-resistant neuropsychiatric diseases. Building on this strong foundation, more and more mental disorders in the stadium of therapy-resistance are considered as possible indications for DBS. Especially, schizophrenia with its associated severe and difficult to treat symptoms is gaining attention. This attention demands critical questions regarding the assumed mechanisms of DBS and its possible influence on the supposed pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Here, we synoptically compare current approaches and theories of DBS and discuss the feasibility of DBS in schizophrenia as well as the transferability from other psychiatric disorders successfully treated with DBS. For this we consider recent advances in animal models of schizophrenic symptoms, results regarding the influence of DBS on dopaminergic transmission as well as data concerning neural oscillation and synchronisation. In conclusion, the use of DBS for some symptoms of schizophrenia seems to be a promising approach, but the lack of a comprehensive theory of the mechanisms of DBS as well as its impact on schizophrenia might hinder the use of DBS for schizophrenia at this point in time.

Schlüsselwörter

Tiefe Hirnstimulation - Schizophrenie - Translationale Medizin - Neuronale Oszillationen

Keywords

deep brain stimulation - schizophrenia - translational medicine - neural oscillations

Literatur

  • 1 Benabid A L, Pollak P, Louveau A et al. Combined (thalamotomy and stimulation) stereotactic surgery of the VIM thalamic nucleus for bilateral Parkinson disease.  Appl Neurophysiol. 1987;  50 (1 – 6) 344-346
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Deuschl G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P et al. A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 (9) 896-908
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Kupsch A, Benecke R, Muller J et al. Pallidal deep-brain stimulation in primary generalized or segmental dystonia.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 (19) 1978-1990
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Schuurman P R, Bosch D A, Bossuyt P M et al. A comparison of continuous thalamic stimulation and thalamotomy for suppression of severe tremor.  N Engl J Med. 2000;  342 (7) 461-468
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Deuschl G, Schade-Brittinger C, Krack P et al. A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease.  The New England journal of medicine. 2006;  355 (9) 896-908
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Skuban T, Flohrer, Klosterkoetter J et al. Psychiatrische Nebenwirkungen der tiefen Hirnstimulation bei M. Parkinson.  submitted
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Nuttin B, Cosyns P, Demeulemeester H et al. Electrical stimulation in anterior limbs of internal capsules in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.  Lancet. 1999;  354 (9189) 1526
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Vandewalle V, Linden van der C, Groenewegen H J et al. Stereotactic treatment of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome by high frequency stimulation of thalamus.  Lancet. 1999;  353 (9154) 724
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Kuhn J, Gründler T OJ, Lenartz D et al. Deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders.  Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;  107 (7) 105-113
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Kuhn J, Gründler T OJ, Bauer R et al. Observations on cognitive control during successful deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens in severe alcohol dependence.  submitted
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Kuhn J, Lenartz D, Huff W et al. Remission of alcohol dependency following deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens: valuable therapeutic implications?.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;  78 (10) 1152-1153
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Laxton A W, Tang-Wai D F, McAndrews M P et al. A phase I trial of deep brain stimulation of memory circuits in Alzheimer’s disease.  Ann Neurol. 2010;  68 (4) 521-534
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Huys D, Möller M, Kim E et al. Die historischen Grundlagen der tiefen Hirnstimulation bei psychiatrischen Erkrankungen.  Nervenarzt. 2011 Aug 25 [Epub ahead of print]
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Trottenberg T, Volkmann J, Deuschl G et al. Treatment of severe tardive dystonia with pallidal deep brain stimulation.  Neurology. 2005;  64 (2) 344-346
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Damier P, Thobois S, Witjas T et al. Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus to treat tardive dyskinesia.  Archives of general psychiatry. 2007;  64 (2) 170-176
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Cipriani A, Boso M, Barbui C. Clozapine combined with different antipsychotic drugs for treatment resistant schizophrenia.  Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2009;  3 CD006324
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Kirkpatrick B, Fenton W S, Carpenter W T et al. The NIMH-MATRICS consensus statement on negative symptoms.  Schizophrenia bulletin. 2006;  32 (2) 214-219
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Os van J, Kapur Jr S. Schizophrenia.  Lancet. 2009;  374 (9690) 635-645
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Wittchen H U, Essau C A, Zerssen von D et al. Lifetime and six-month prevalence of mental disorders in the Munich Follow-Up Study.  European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience. 1992;  241 (4) 247-258
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Perala J, Suvisaari J, Saarni S I et al. Lifetime prevalence of psychotic and bipolar I disorders in a general population.  Archives of general psychiatry. 2007;  64 (1) 19-28
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Skantze K. Subjective quality of life and standard of living: a 10-year follow-up of out-patients with schizophrenia.  Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica. 1998;  98 (5) 390-399
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Pinikahana J, Happell B, Hope J et al. Quality of life in schizophrenia: a review of the literature from 1995 to 2000.  International journal of mental health nursing. 2002;  11 (2) 103-111
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Castle D J, Morgan V. Epidemiology. In: Mueser K T, Jeste D V, eds Clinical handbook of schizophrenia. New York: The Guilford Press; 2008: 14-24
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Andreasen N C, Carpenter Jr W T, Kane J M et al. Remission in schizophrenia: proposed criteria and rationale for consensus.  The American journal of psychiatry. 2005;  162 (3) 441-449
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Lambert M, Karow A, Leucht S et al. Remission in schizophrenia: validity, frequency, predictors, and patients’ perspective 5 years later.  Dialogues in clinical neuroscience. 2010;  12 (3) 393-407
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Krack P, Batir A, Van Blercom N et al. Five-year follow-up of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in advanced Parkinson’s disease.  The New England journal of medicine. 2003;  349 (20) 1925-1934
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Oh M Y, Abosch A, Kim S H et al. Long-term hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation.  Neurosurgery. 2002;  50 (6) 1268-1274 ; discussion 1274 – 1276
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Müller S, Christen M. Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinsonian Patients – Ethical Evaluation of Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Sequelae.  AJOB Neuroscience. 2011;  2 (1) 3-13
    Google Scholar
  • 29 McIntyre C C, Savasta M, Kerkerian-Le Goff L et al. Uncovering the mechanism(s) of action of deep brain stimulation: activation, inhibition, or both.  Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;  115 (6) 1239-1248
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Dostrovsky J O, Levy R, Wu J P et al. Microstimulation-induced inhibition of neuronal firing in human globus pallidus.  J Neurophysiol. 2000;  84 (1) 570-574
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Beurrier C, Bioulac B, Audin J et al. High-frequency stimulation produces a transient blockade of voltage-gated currents in subthalamic neurons.  J Neurophysiol. 2001;  85 (4) 1351-1356
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Leiphart J W, Valone3 rd F H. Stereotactic lesions for the treatment of psychiatric disorders.  J Neurosurg. 2010;  113 (6) 1204-1211
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Ridding M C, Rothwell J C. Is there a future for therapeutic use of transcranial magnetic stimulation?.  Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;  8 (7) 559-567
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Pascual-Leone A, Bartres-Faz D, Keenan J P. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying the brain-behaviour relationship by induction of ‘virtual lesions’.  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;  354 (1387) 1229-1238
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Jandl M. The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH).  Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2010;  78 (11) 632-643
    Google Scholar
  • 36 Aleman A, Sommer I E, Kahn R S. Efficacy of slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of resistant auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.  The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 2007;  68 (3) 416-421
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Slotema C W, Blom J D, Hoek H W et al. Should we expand the toolbox of psychiatric treatment methods to include Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of rTMS in psychiatric disorders.  The Journal of clinical psychiatry. 2010;  71 (7) 873-884
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Slotema C W, Blom J D, Weijer A D et al. Can low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation really relieve medication-resistant auditory verbal hallucinations? Negative results from a large randomized controlled trial.  Biological psychiatry. 2011;  69 (5) 450-456
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Payne N A, Prudic de J. Electroconvulsive therapy: Part I. A perspective on the evolution and current practice of ECT.  Journal of psychiatric practice. 2009;  15 (5) 346-368
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Kato N. Neurophysiological mechanisms of electroconvulsive therapy for depression.  Neuroscience research. 2009;  64 (1) 3-11
    Google Scholar
  • 41 Daniels J. Catatonia: clinical aspects and neurobiological correlates.  The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences. 2009;  21 (4) 371-380
    Google Scholar
  • 42 Sanacora G, Mason G F, Rothman D L et al. Increased cortical GABA concentrations in depressed patients receiving ECT.  The American journal of psychiatry. 2003;  160 (3) 577-579
    Google Scholar
  • 43 Northoff G. What catatonia can tell us about „top-down modulation“: a neuropsychiatric hypothesis.  The Behavioral and brain sciences. 2002;  25 (5) 555-577 ; discussion 578 – 604
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Mikell C B, McKhann G M, Segal S et al. The hippocampus and nucleus accumbens as potential therapeutic targets for neurosurgical intervention in schizophrenia.  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2009;  87 (4) 256-265
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Kapur S. Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia.  Am J Psychiatry. 2003;  160 (1) 13-23
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Kapur S, Mizrahi R, Li M. From dopamine to salience to psychosis – linking biology, pharmacology and phenomenology of psychosis.  Schizophrenia research. 2005;  79 (1) 59-68
    Google Scholar
  • 47 Goto Y, Otani S, Grace A A. The Yin and Yang of dopamine release: a new perspective.  Neuropharmacology. 2007;  53 (5) 583-587
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Kapur S, Mamo D. Half a century of antipsychotics and still a central role for dopamine D 2 receptors.  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2003;  27 (7) 1081-1090
    Google Scholar
  • 49 Juckel G, Schlagenhauf F, Koslowski M et al. Dysfunction of ventral striatal reward prediction in schizophrenic patients treated with typical, not atypical, neuroleptics.  Psychopharmacology. 2006;  187 (2) 222-228
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Rosenfeld A J, Lieberman J A, Jarskog L F. Oxytocin, Dopamine, and the Amygdala: A Neurofunctional Model of Social Cognitive Deficits in Schizophrenia.  Schizophr Bull. 2011;  37 (5) 1077-1087
    Google Scholar
  • 51 Harvey P D, Koren D, Reichenberg A et al. Negative symptoms and cognitive deficits: what is the nature of their relationship?.  Schizophr Bull. 2006;  32 (2) 250-258
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Ventura J, Hellemann G S, Thames A D et al. Symptoms as mediators of the relationship between neurocognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.  Schizophr Res. 2009;  113 (2 – 3) 189-199
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Juckel G, Schlagenhauf F, Koslowski M et al. Dysfunction of ventral striatal reward prediction in schizophrenia.  Neuroimage. 2006;  29 (2) 409-416
    Google Scholar
  • 54 Niv Y, Daw N D, Joel D et al. Tonic dopamine: opportunity costs and the control of response vigor.  Psychopharmacology. 2007;  191 (3) 507-520
    Google Scholar
  • 55 Schlaepfer T E, Cohen M X, Frick C et al. Deep brain stimulation to reward circuitry alleviates anhedonia in refractory major depression.  Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;  33 (2) 368-377
    Google Scholar
  • 56 Hamamura T, Harada T. Unique pharmacological profile of aripiprazole as the phasic component buster.  Psychopharmacology. 2007;  191 (3) 741-743
    Google Scholar
  • 57 Mazza M, Squillacioti M R, Pecora R D et al. Effect of aripiprazole on self-reported anhedonia in bipolar depressed patients.  Psychiatry Res. 2009;  165 (1 – 2) 193-196
    Google Scholar
  • 58 Leucht S, Corves C, Arbter D et al. Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis.  Lancet. 2009;  373 (9657) 31-41
    Google Scholar
  • 59 Sandyk R. Pineal and habenula calcification in schizophrenia.  Int J Neurosci. 1992;  67 (1 – 4) 19-30
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Corfas G, Roy K, Buxbaum J D. Neuregulin 1-erbB signaling and the molecular/cellular basis of schizophrenia.  Nat Neurosci. 2004;  7 (6) 575-580
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Williams N M, Preece A, Spurlock G et al. Support for genetic variation in neuregulin 1 and susceptibility to schizophrenia.  Mol Psychiatry. 2003;  8 (5) 485-487
    Google Scholar
  • 62 Yang J Z, Si T M, Ruan Y et al. Association study of neuregulin 1 gene with schizophrenia.  Mol Psychiatry. 2003;  8 (7) 706-9
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Steiner H, Blum M, Kitai S T et al. Differential expression of ErbB3 and ErbB4 neuregulin receptors in dopamine neurons and forebrain areas of the adult rat.  Exp Neurol. 1999;  159 (2) 494-503
    Google Scholar
  • 64 Lecourtier L, Kelly P H. Bilateral lesions of the habenula induce attentional disturbances in rats.  Neuropsychopharmacology. 2005;  30 (3) 484-496
    Google Scholar
  • 65 Lecourtier L, Neijt H C, Kelly P H. Habenula lesions cause impaired cognitive performance in rats: implications for schizophrenia.  Eur J Neurosci. 2004;  19 (9) 2551-2560
    Google Scholar
  • 66 Heldt S A, Ressler K J. Lesions of the habenula produce stress- and dopamine-dependent alterations in prepulse inhibition and locomotion.  Brain Res. 2006;  1073 – 1074 229-239
    Google Scholar
  • 67 Shepard P D, Holcomb H H, Gold J M. Schizophrenia in translation: the presence of absence: habenular regulation of dopamine neurons and the encoding of negative outcomes.  Schizophr Bull. 2006;  32 (3) 417-421
    Google Scholar
  • 68 Paul G, Reum T, Meissner W et al. High frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus influences striatal dopaminergic metabolism in the naive rat.  Neuroreport. 2000;  11 (3) 441-444
    Google Scholar
  • 69 Meissner W, Harnack D, Reese R et al. High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus enhances striatal dopamine release and metabolism in rats.  J Neurochem. 2003;  85 (3) 601-609
    Google Scholar
  • 70 Meissner W, Harnack D, Paul G et al. Deep brain stimulation of subthalamic neurons increases striatal dopamine metabolism and induces contralateral circling in freely moving 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats.  Neurosci Lett. 2002;  328 (2) 105-108
    Google Scholar
  • 71 Meissner W, Reum T, Paul G et al. Striatal dopaminergic metabolism is increased by deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in 6-hydroxydopamine lesioned rats.  Neurosci Lett. 2001;  303 (3) 165-168
    Google Scholar
  • 72 Winter C, Lemke C, Sohr R et al. High frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus modulates neurotransmission in limbic brain regions of the rat.  Exp Brain Res. 2008;  185 (3) 497-507
    Google Scholar
  • 73 Benazzouz A, Piallat B, Pollak P et al. Responses of substantia nigra pars reticulata and globus pallidus complex to high frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in rats: electrophysiological data.  Neurosci Lett. 1995;  189 (2) 77-80
    Google Scholar
  • 74 Benazzouz A, Gao D M, Ni Z G et al. Effect of high-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on the neuronal activities of the substantia nigra pars reticulata and ventrolateral nucleus of the thalamus in the rat.  Neuroscience. 2000;  99 (2) 289-295
    Google Scholar
  • 75 Benazzouz A, Gao D, Ni Z et al. High frequency stimulation of the STN influences the activity of dopamine neurons in the rat.  Neuroreport. 2000;  11 (7) 1593-1596
    Google Scholar
  • 76 Robledo P, Feger J. Excitatory influence of rat subthalamic nucleus to substantia nigra pars reticulata and the pallidal complex: electrophysiological data.  Brain Res. 1990;  518 (1 – 2) 47-54
    Google Scholar
  • 77 Bruet N, Windels F, Carcenac C et al. Neurochemical mechanisms induced by high frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus: increase of extracellular striatal glutamate and GABA in normal and hemiparkinsonian rats.  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2003;  62 (12) 1228-1240
    Google Scholar
  • 78 Buzsaki G, Draguhn A. Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks.  Science. 2004;  304 (5679) 1926-1929
    Google Scholar
  • 79 Uhlhaas P J, Roux F, Singer W et al. The development of neural synchrony reflects late maturation and restructuring of functional networks in humans.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;  106 (24) 9866-9871
    Google Scholar
  • 80 Stein von A, Sarnthein J. Different frequencies for different scales of cortical integration: from local gamma to long range alpha/theta synchronization.  Int J Psychophysiol. 2000;  38 (3) 301-313
    Google Scholar
  • 81 Uhlhaas P J, Singer W. Abnormal neural oscillations and synchrony in schizophrenia.  Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;  11 (2) 100-113
    Google Scholar
  • 82 Boutros N. Lack of blinding in gating studies.  Schizophr Res. 2008;  103 (1 – 3) 336 ; author reply 337
    Google Scholar
  • 83 Spencer K M, Nestor P G, Perlmutter R et al. Neural synchrony indexes disordered perception and cognition in schizophrenia.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;  101 (49) 17 288-17 293
    Google Scholar
  • 84 Uhlhaas P J, Haenschel C, Nikolic D et al. The role of oscillations and synchrony in cortical networks and their putative relevance for the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.  Schizophr Bull. 2008;  34 (5) 927-943
    Google Scholar
  • 85 Uhlhaas P J, Linden D E, Singer W et al. Dysfunctional long-range coordination of neural activity during Gestalt perception in schizophrenia.  J Neurosci. 2006;  26 (31) 8168-8175
    Google Scholar
  • 86 Haenschel C, Linden D E, Bittner R A et al. Alpha phase locking predicts residual working memory performance in schizophrenia.  Biol Psychiatry. 2010;  68 (7) 595-598
    Google Scholar
  • 87 Rolls E T, Loh M, Deco G et al. Computational models of schizophrenia and dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex.  Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008;  9 (9) 696-709
    Google Scholar
  • 88 Teubner M D, Nixon J B, Rasser P E et al. Source localisation in a real human head.  Brain Topogr. 2005;  17 (4) 197-205
    Google Scholar
  • 89 Timmermann L, Gross J, Butz M et al. Pathological oscillatory coupling within the human motor system in different tremor syndromes as revealed by magnetoencephalography.  Neurol Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;  26
    Google Scholar
  • 90 Timmermann L, Gross J, Dirks M et al. The cerebral oscillatory network of parkinsonian resting tremor.  Brain. 2003;  126 (Pt 1) 199-212
    Google Scholar
  • 91 Kuhn A A, Kupsch A, Schneider G H et al. Reduction in subthalamic 8 – 35 Hz oscillatory activity correlates with clinical improvement in Parkinson’s disease.  Eur J Neurosci. 2006;  23 (7) 1956-1960
    Google Scholar
  • 92 Kuhn A A, Williams D, Kupsch A et al. Event-related beta desynchronization in human subthalamic nucleus correlates with motor performance.  Brain. 2004;  127 (Pt 4) 735-746
    Google Scholar
  • 93 Meissner W, Leblois A, Hansel D et al. Subthalamic high frequency stimulation resets subthalamic firing and reduces abnormal oscillations.  Brain. 2005;  128 (Pt 10) 2372-2382
    Google Scholar
  • 94 Gallinat J, Mulert C, Bajbouj M et al. Frontal and temporal dysfunction of auditory stimulus processing in schizophrenia.  Neuroimage. 2002;  17 (1) 110-127
    Google Scholar
  • 95 Javitt D C. When doors of perception close: bottom-up models of disrupted cognition in schizophrenia.  Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;  5 249-275
    Google Scholar
  • 96 Adcock R A, Dale C, Fisher M et al. When top-down meets bottom-up: auditory training enhances verbal memory in schizophrenia.  Schizophr Bull. 2009;  35 (6) 1132-1141
    Google Scholar
  • 97 Arends M, Winterer G. Tiefe Hirnstimulation bei Schizophrenie – Ein neues Forschungsprojekt.  Nervenarzt. 2008;  Suppl 4 470
    Google Scholar
  • 98 Gross A, Joutsiniemi S L, Rimon R et al. Clozapine-induced QEEG changes correlate with clinical response in schizophrenic patients: a prospective, longitudinal study.  Pharmacopsychiatry. 2004;  37 (3) 119-122
    Google Scholar
  • 99 Andreasen N C. Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS). Iowa City: University of Iowa Press; 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 100 Gschwandtner U, Zimmermann R, Pflueger M O et al. Negative symptoms in neuroleptic-naive patients with first-episode psychosis correlate with QEEG parameters.  Schizophr Res. 2009;  115 (2 – 3) 231-236
    Google Scholar
  • 101 Singer W. Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations?.  Neuron. 1999;  24 (1) 49-65, 111 – 125
    Google Scholar
  • 102 Mundt A, Klein J, Joel D et al. High-frequency stimulation of the nucleus accumbens core and shell reduces quinpirole-induced compulsive checking in rats.  Eur J Neurosci. 2009;  29 (12) 2401-2412
    Google Scholar
  • 103 Klavir O, Flash S, Winter C et al. High frequency stimulation and pharmacological inactivation of the subthalamic nucleus reduces ‘compulsive’ lever-pressing in rats.  Exp Neurol. 2009;  215 (1) 101-109
    Google Scholar
  • 104 Klavir O, Winter C, Joel D. High but not low frequency stimulation of both the globus pallidus and the entopeduncular nucleus reduces ‘compulsive’ lever-pressing in rats.  Behav Brain Res. 2011;  216 (1) 84-93
    Google Scholar
  • 105 Djodari-Irani A, Klein J, Banzhaf J et al. HFS and pharmacological inactivation of the globus pallidus and nucleus entopeduncularis differentially affect quinpirole-induced compulsive checking in rats.  European Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010;  20 S281-S282
    Google Scholar
  • 106 Winter C, Flash S, Klavir O et al. The role of the subthalamic nucleus in ‘compulsive’ behavior in rats.  Eur J Neurosci. 2008;  27 (8) 1902-1911
    Google Scholar
  • 107 Hamani C, Nobrega J N. Deep brain stimulation in clinical trials and animal models of depression.  Eur J Neurosci. 2010;  32 (7) 1109-1117
    Google Scholar
  • 108 Hamani C, Diwan M, Macedo C E et al. Antidepressant-like effects of medial prefrontal cortex deep brain stimulation in rats.  Biol Psychiatry. 2010;  67 (2) 117-124
    Google Scholar
  • 109 Vassoler F M, Schmidt H D, Gerard M E et al. Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens shell attenuates cocaine priming-induced reinstatement of drug seeking in rats.  J Neurosci. 2008;  28 (35) 8735-8739
    Google Scholar
  • 110 Rouaud T, Lardeux S, Panayotis N et al. Reducing the desire for cocaine with subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;  107 (3) 1196-1200
    Google Scholar
  • 111 Winter C, Harnack D, Kupsch A. Deep brain stimulation for neurological and psychiatric diseases: animal experiments on effect and mechanisms.  Nervenarzt. 2010;  81 (6) 711-718
    Google Scholar
  • 112 Feldon J, Weiner I. Editorial: Special issue on modeling schizophrenia.  Behav Brain Res. 2009;  204 (2) 255-257
    Google Scholar
  • 113 Andreasen N C. The American concept of schizophrenia.  Schizophr Bull. 1989;  15 (4) 519-531
    Google Scholar
  • 114 Klosterkotter J. The revised definitions of schizophrenic disorders in ICD-10 and DSM-IV.  Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1998;  66 (3) 133-143
    Google Scholar
  • 115 Kirkpatrick B, Fenton W S, Carpenter Jr W T et al. The NIMH-MATRICS consensus statement on negative symptoms.  Schizophr Bull. 2006;  32 (2) 214-219
    Google Scholar
  • 116 Carter C S, Barch D M, Buchanan R W et al. Identifying cognitive mechanisms targeted for treatment development in schizophrenia: an overview of the first meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Initiative.  Biol Psychiatry. 2008;  64 (1) 4-10
    Google Scholar
  • 117 Nuechterlein K H, Green M F, Kern R S et al. The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity.  Am J Psychiatry. 2008;  165 (2) 203-213
    Google Scholar

1 Die Autoren J. Kuhn und M. Bodatsch haben in gleicher Weise zum Manuskript beigetragen.

Prof. Jens Kuhn

Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Klinikum der Universität Köln

Kerpener Str. 62

50937 Köln

Email: jens.kuhn@uk-koeln.de

      >