Download PDF
Semin Hear 2012; 33(04): 307-334
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329222
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Music Appreciation and Training for Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Review

Valerie Looi
1   The Department of Communication Disorders, the University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
2   Cochlear Ltd. (Asia Pacific), Australia
,
Kate Gfeller
3   School of Music
4   Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders
5   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Virginia D. Driscoll
5   Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center, Iowa City, Iowa
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 November 2012 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

In recent years, there has been increasing interest in music perception of cochlear implant (CI) recipients and a growing body of research conducted in this area. The majority of these studies have examined perceptual accuracy for pitch, rhythm, and timbre. Another important, but less commonly studied aspect of music listening is appreciation, or appraisal. Despite the ongoing research into potential technological improvements that may improve music perception for recipients, both perceptual accuracy and appreciation generally remain poor for most recipients. Although perceptual accuracy for music is important, appreciation and enjoyment also warrant research as they contribute to clinical outcomes and perceived benefits. Music training offers excellent potential for improving music perception and appreciation for recipients. Therefore, the primary topics of this review are music appreciation and training. However, a brief overview of the psychoacoustic, technical, and physiological factors associated with a recipient's perception of music are provided, as these are important factors in understanding the listening experience for CI recipients. The purpose of this review is to summarize key articles that have investigated these issues, to demonstrate that (1) music enjoyment and appraisal is an important and valid consideration in evaluating music outcomes for recipients, and (2) that music training can improve music listening for many recipients, and is something that can be offered to persons using current technology.

Keywords

cochlear implants - music - quality of life - rehabilitation - training - sound quality
 

  • References

  • 1 Gfeller K, Oleson J, Knutson JF, Breheny P, Driscoll V, Olszewski C. Multivariate predictors of music perception and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users. J Am Acad Audiol 2008; 19: 120-134
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gfeller K, Jiang D, Oleson JJ, Driscoll V, Knutson JF. Temporal stability of music perception and appraisal scores of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21: 28-34
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L. Comparisons of quality ratings for music by cochlear implant and hearing aid users. Ear Hear 2007; 28 (2, Suppl) 59S-61S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Krumhansl CL, Iverson P. Perceptual interactions between musical pitch and timbre. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1992; 18: 739-751
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Gfeller K, Woodworth G, Robin DA, Witt S, Knutson JF. Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 252-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wolfe J. Speech and music, acoustics and coding, and what music might be “for”. In: Stevens C, Burnham D, McPherson G, Schubert E, Renwick J, , eds. 7th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition; 2002; Sydney, Australia: Casual Productions; 2002: 10-13
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Moore BCJ. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. 5th ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Morgan CT, Garner WR, Galambos R. Pitch and intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1951; 23: 658-663
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Rasch RA, Plomp R. The perception of musical tones. In: Deutsch D, , ed. The Psychology of Music. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1982: 1-22
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Goldstein JL. An optimum processor theory for the central formation of the pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 54: 1496-1516
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Meddis R, O'Mard L. A unitary model of pitch perception. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 1811-1820
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Moore BCJ. Coding of sounds in the auditory system and its relevance to signal processing and coding in cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol 2003; 24: 243-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Plomp R. Pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1967; 41: 1526-1533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ritsma RJ. Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 1967; 42: 191-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Moore BCJ, Rosen SM. Tune recognition with reduced pitch and interval information. Q J Exp Psychol 1979; 31: 229-240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Grey JM. Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. J Acoust Soc Am 1977; 61: 1270-1277
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 von Bismarck G. Timbre of steady state sounds: a factorial investigation of its verbal attributes. Acustica 1974; 30: 146-159
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Gfeller K, Witt S, Adamek M , et al. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 132-145
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Moore BCJ, Carlyon RP. Perception of pitch by people with cochlear hearing loss and by cochlear implant users. In: Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ, Fay RR, Popper AN, , eds. Pitch: Neural Coding and Perception. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2005: 234-277
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Moore BCJ, Skrodzka E. Detection of frequency modulation by hearing-impaired listeners: effects of carrier frequency, modulation rate, and added amplitude modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111 (1 Pt 1) 327-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Moore BCJ. Perceptual Consequences of Cochlear Damage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1995
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR. Effects of the relative phase of the components on the pitch discrimination of complex tones by subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments. In: Duifhuis H, Horst JW, Witt HP, , eds. Basic Issues in Hearing Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Hearing; April 5–9, 1988; Paterswolde, Netherlands: Academic Press; 1988: 421-430
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Moore BCJ, Peters RW. Pitch discrimination and phase sensitivity in young and elderly subjects and its relationship to frequency selectivity. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 2881-2893
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Arehart KH. Effects of harmonic content on complex-tone fundamental-frequency discrimination in hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95: 3574-3585
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Moore BCJ. Perceptual consequences of cochlear hearing loss and their implications for the design of hearing aids. Ear Hear 1996; 17: 133-161
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Moore BCJ, Moore GA. Discrimination of the fundamental frequency of complex tones with fixed and shifting spectral envelopes by normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Hear Res 2003; 182: 153-163
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Leek MR, Molis MR, Kubli LR, Tufts JB. Enjoyment of music by elderly hearing-impaired listeners. J Am Acad Audiol 2008; 19: 519-526
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Feldmann H, Kumpf W. [Listening to music in hearing loss with and without a hearing aid]. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg) 1988; 67: 489-497
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR. Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1988; 83: 1093-1101
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 1067-1073
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Shannon RV. Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 2587-2592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Shannon RV. Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91 (4 Pt 1) 2156-2164
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Busby PA, Whitford LA, Blamey PJ, Richardson LM, Clark GM. Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 95 (5 Pt 1) 2658-2669
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Townshend B, Cotter N, Van Compernolle D, White RL. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1987; 82: 106-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Shannon RV, Fu QJ, Galvin JJ, Friesen L. Speech perception with cochlear implants. In: Zeng FG, Popper AN, Fay RR, , eds. Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing. New York, NY: Springer; 2004: 334-376
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Clark GM. Cochlear Implants: Fundamentals and Applications. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 2003
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 37 McDermott HJ. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif 2004; 8: 49-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM. Pitch percepts associated with amplitude-modulated current pulse trains in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96 (5 Pt 1) 2664-2673
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM. Pitch matching of amplitude-modulated current pulse trains by cochlear implantees: the effect of modulation depth. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 1777-1785
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Geurts L, Wouters J. Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109: 713-726
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 McKay CM, McDermott HJ. The perception of temporal patterns for electrical stimulation presented at one or two intracochlear sites. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 100 (2 Pt 1) 1081-1092
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 McKay CM. Psychophysics and electrical stimulation. In: Zeng FG, Popper AN, Fay RR, , eds. Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing. New York, NY: Springer; 2004: 286-333
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Zeng FG. Temporal pitch in electric hearing. Hear Res 2002; 174: 101-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Pijl S, Schwarz DW. Melody recognition and musical interval perception by deaf subjects stimulated with electrical pulse trains through single cochlear implant electrodes. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98 (2 Pt 1) 886-895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 McKay CM, McDermott HJ, Clark GM. The perceptual dimensions of single-electrode and nonsimultaneous dual-electrode stimuli in cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 1996; 99: 1079-1090
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Smith ZM, Delgutte B, Oxenham AJ. Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception. Nature 2002; 416: 87-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Wilson BS, Sun X, Schatzer R, Wolford RD. Representation of fine structure or fine frequency information with cochlear implants. In: Miyamoto RT, , ed. The VIII International Cochlear Implant Conference; May 10–13, 2004; Indianapolis, IN: Elsevier; 2004: 3-6
    Google Scholar
  • 48 Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson JF, Witt S, Murray KT, Tyler RS. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11: 390-406
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Gfeller K, Lansing C. Musical perception of cochlear implant users as measured by the Primary Measures of Music Audiation: an item analysis. J Music Ther 1992; 29: 18-39
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Gfeller K, Lansing CR. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 916-920
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Schulz E, Kerber M. Music perception with the MED-EL implants. In: Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, , eds. Advances in Cochlear Implants. Vienna, Austria: Datenkonvertierung, Reproduktion und Druck; 1994: 326-332
    Google Scholar
  • 52 Looi V. The effect of cochlear implantation of music: a review. Otorinolaringologia 2008; 58: 169-190
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Sucher CM, McDermott HJ. Pitch ranking of complex tones by normally hearing subjects and cochlear implant users. Hear Res 2007; 230: 80-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users. Ear Hear 2008; 29: 421-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L. The effect of cochlear implantation on music perception by adults with usable pre-operative acoustic hearing. Int J Audiol 2008; 47: 257-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Gfeller K, Knutson JF, Woodworth G, Witt S, DeBus B. Timbral recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults. J Am Acad Audiol 1998; 9: 1-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Leal MC, Shin YJ, Laborde ML , et al. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123: 826-835
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Gfeller K, Witt S, Woodworth G, Mehr MA, Knutson J. Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2002; 111: 349-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Vongpaisal T, Trehub SE, Schellenberg EG, Papsin B. Music recognition by children with cochlear implants. In: Miyamoto RT, , ed. The VIII International Cochlear Implant Conference; May 10–13, 2004; Indianapolis, IN: Elsevier; 2004: 193-196
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Gfeller K, Turner C, Mehr M , et al. Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int 2002; 3: 29-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Fujita S, Ito J. Ability of nucleus cochlear implantees to recognize music. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108 (7 Pt 1) 634-640
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Gfeller K, Olszewski C, Rychener M , et al. Recognition of “real-world” musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Ear Hear 2005; 26: 237-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Gfeller K, Witt S, Stordahl J, Mehr M, Woodworth G. The effects of training on melody recognition and appraisal by adult cochlear implant recipients. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 2000; 33: 115-138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 173-185
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Gfeller K, Christ A, Knutson J, Witt S, Mehr M. The effects of familiarity and complexity on appraisal of complex songs by cochlear implant recipients and normal hearing adults. J Music Ther 2003; 40: 78-112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Looi V, She JHK. Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. Int J Audiol 2010; 49: 116-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Looi V, Winter P, Anderson I, Sucher C. A music quality rating test battery for cochlear implant users to compare the FSP and HDCIS strategies for music appreciation. Int J Audiol 2011; 50: 503-518
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 LeBlanc A. An interactive theory of music preference. J Mus Th 1982; 19: 28-45
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Mirza S, Douglas SA, Lindsey P, Hildreth T, Hawthorne M. Appreciation of music in adult patients with cochlear implants: a patient questionnaire. Cochlear Implants Int 2003; 4: 85-95
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Lassaletta L, Castro A, Bastarrica M , et al. [Musical perception and enjoyment in post-lingual patients with cochlear implants]. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2008; 59: 228-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Wilson BS, Witt S, Preece JP, Noble W. Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 98-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Kiefer J, von Ilberg C, Reimer B , et al. Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss—implications for patient selection. Audiology 1998; 37: 382-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Gantz BJ, Turner C. Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol 2004; 124: 344-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Gantz BJ, Turner C, Gfeller KE, Lowder MW. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope 2005; 115: 796-802
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Kong YY, Stickney GS, Zeng FG. Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117 (3 Pt 1) 1351-1361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Gfeller K, Turner C, Oleson J , et al. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear Hear 2007; 28: 412-423
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Gfeller KE, Olszewski C, Turner C, Gantz B, Oleson J. Music perception with cochlear implants and residual hearing. Audiol Neurootol 2006; 11 (Suppl. 01) 12-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 El Fata F, James CJ, Laborde ML, Fraysse B. How much residual hearing is “useful” for music perception with cochlear implants?. Audiol Neurootol 2009; 14: 14S-21S
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Looi V, Radford CJ. A comparison of the speech recognition and pitch ranking abilities of children using a unilateral cochlear implant, bimodal stimulation or bilateral hearing aids. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 74: 472-482
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Reiss LA, Gantz BJ, Turner CW. Cochlear implant speech processor frequency allocations may influence pitch perception. Otol Neurotol 2008; 29: 160-167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Moore DR, Amitay S. Auditory training: rules and applications. Semin Hear 2007; 28: 99
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Fu QJ, Galvin III JJ. Perceptual learning and auditory training in cochlear implant recipients. Trends Amplif 2007; 11: 193-205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Boothroyd A. Adapting to changed hearing: the potential role of formal training. J Am Acad Audiol 2010; 21: 601-611
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Amitay S, Irwin A, Moore DR. Discrimination learning induced by training with identical stimuli. Nat Neurosci 2006; 9: 1446-1448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Gfeller K. Aural rehabilitation of music listening for adult cochlear implant recipients: addressing learner characteristics. Music Ther Perspect 2001; 19: 88-95
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Gfeller K, Witt SA, Kim KH, Adamek M, Coffman D. Preliminary report of a computerized music training program for adult cochlear implant recipients. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 1999; 32: 11-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Galvin III JJ, Fu QJ, Shannon RV. Melodic contour identification and music perception by cochlear implant users. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009; 1169: 518-533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Loebach JL, Pisoni DB. Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 123: 1126-1139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Loebach JL, Pisoni DB, Svirsky MA. Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2009; 30: 662-674
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Moore DR, Rosenberg JF, Coleman JS. Discrimination training of phonemic contrasts enhances phonological processing in mainstream school children. Brain Lang 2005; 94: 72-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Roth DA, Appelbaum M, Milo C, Kishon-Rabin L. Generalization to untrained conditions following training with identical stimuli. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol 2008; 19: 223-236
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Cross I. Music, Cognition, Culture, and Evolution. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2004: 42-56
    Google Scholar
  • 93 Huron D. Is music and evolutionary adaptation?. In: Peretz I, Zatorre R, , eds. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Music. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2004: 57-78
    Google Scholar
  • 94 Gfeller KE. Music: a human phenomenon and therapeutic tool. In: Davis WB, Gfeller KE, Thaut MH, , eds. An Introduction to Music Therapy Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. Silver Spring, MD: American Music Therapy Association; 2008: 41-75
    Google Scholar
  • 95 Gfeller KE, Knutson JF. Music to the impaired or implanted ear: psychosocial implications for aural rehabilitation. ASHA Lead 2003; 8: 12-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 North AC, Hargreaves DJ. The Social and Applied Psychology of Music. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2008: 341-347
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Saarikallio S. Music as emotional self-regulation through adulthood. Psychol Music 2011; 39: 307-327
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Christenson PG, DeBenedittis P, Lindlof TR. Children's use of audio media. Communic Res 1985; 12: 327-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Gfeller K, Mehr M, Witt S. Aural rehabilitation of music perception and enjoyment of adult cochlear implant users. J Acad Rehabil Audiol 2001; 34: 17-27
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Kraus N, Skoe E. Part VIII introduction: new directions: cochlear implants. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009; 1169: 516-517
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Shahin AJ. Neurophysiological influence of musical training on speech perception. Front Psychol 2011; 2: 126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Chermak G. Music and auditory training. Hear J 2010; 63: 57-58
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Limb CJ, Rubinstein JT. Current research on music perception in cochlear implant users. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2012; 45: 129-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Strait DL, Kraus N, Skoe E, Ashley R. Musical experience promotes subcortical efficiency in processing emotional vocal sounds. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009; 1169: 209-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Patel AD. Why would musical training benefit the neural encoding of speech? The OPERA hypothesis. Front Psychol 2011; 2: 142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Galvin III JJ, Fu QJ, Nogaki G. Melodic contour identification by cochlear implant listeners. Ear Hear 2007; 28: 302-319
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Driscoll VD, Oleson J, Jiang D, Gfeller K. Effects of training on recognition of musical instruments presented through cochlear implant simulations. J Am Acad Audiol 2009; 20: 71-82
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Philips B, Vinck B, De Vel E , et al. Characteristics and determinants of music appreciation in adult CI users. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 269: 813-821
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Hughes S, Llewellyn C, Miah R. Let's face the music! Results of a Saturday morning music group for cochlear-implanted adults. Cochlear Implants Int 2010; 11: 69-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Gfeller K, Driscoll V, Kenworthy M, Van Voorst T. Music therapy for preschool cochlear implant recipients. Music Ther Perspect 2011; 29: 39-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Hsiao F, Gfeller K. Music perception of cochlear implant recipients with implications for music instruction: a review of literature. Update 2012; 30: 5-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 Hsiao FL, Gfeller K. How we do it: adaptation of music instruction for pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Cochlear Implants Int 2011; 12: 205-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Trehub SE, Vongpaisal T, Nakata T. Music in the lives of deaf children with cochlear implants. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009; 1169: 534-542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Skoe E, Kraus N. Hearing it again and again: on-line subcortical plasticity in humans. PLoS ONE 2010; 5: e13645-e13645
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 American Academy of Audiology. Music Training and Cochlear Implants. Available at: http://www.audiology.org/news/Pages/20100421.aspx . Accessed October 11, 2011
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 116 DeThorne LS, Johnson CJ, Walder L, Mahurin-Smith J. When “Simon says” doesn't work: alternatives to imitation for facilitating early speech development. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2009; 18: 133-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Gfeller KE, Darrow AA. Music therapy in the treatment of sensory disorders. In: Davis WB, Gfeller KE, Thaut MH, , eds. An Introduction to Music Therapy Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. Silver Spring, MD: American Music Therapy Association; 2008: 365-404
    Google Scholar
  • 118 Abdi S, Khalessi MH, Khorsandi M, Gholami B. Introducing music as a means of habilitation for children with cochlear implants. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2001; 59: 105-113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Yucel E, Sennaroglu G, Belgin E. The family oriented musical training for children with cochlear implants: speech and musical perception results of two year follow-up. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 73: 1043-1052
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 120 Chen JK, Chuang AY, McMahon C, Hsieh JC, Tung TH, Li LP. Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants. Pediatrics 2010; 125: e793-e800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 121 Musacchia G, Sams M, Skoe E, Kraus N. Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104: 15894-15898
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 122 Musacchia G, Strait D, Kraus N. Relationships between behavior, brainstem and cortical encoding of seen and heard speech in musicians and non-musicians. Hear Res 2008; 241: 34-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 123 Wong PCM, Skoe E, Russo NM, Dees T, Kraus N. Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nat Neurosci 2007; 10: 420-422
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Ho YC, Cheung MC, Chan AS. Music training improves verbal but not visual memory: cross-sectional and longitudinal explorations in children. Neuropsychology 2003; 17: 439-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 125 Moreno S, Marques C, Santos A, Santos M, Castro SL, Besson M. Musical training influences linguistic abilities in 8-year-old children: more evidence for brain plasticity. Cereb Cortex 2009; 19: 712-723
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar