J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2014; 75(01): 007-011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1334490
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Clinical Outcome of Percutaneous Drainage for Spondylodiscitis

Yasuaki Murata
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Kohichi Kanaya
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Hiroyoshi Wada
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Keiji Wada
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Masahiro Shiba
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Satoshi Hatta
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Ken Kato
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yoshiharu Kato
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

19 February 2012

20 October 2012

Publication Date:
20 May 2013 (online)

Abstract

Background Although vertebral debridement with interbody fusion is a useful procedure for the treatment of spondylodiscitis, anterior interbody fusion (AIF) is risky to perform on patients in a poor condition since it is highly invasive. Percutaneous nucleotomy and drainage (PND) is less invasive than AIF, but there only have been few reports regarding the outcome. The purpose of this study was to test the efficacy of PND for spondylodiscitis.

Patients and Methods To analyze the effectiveness of different surgical treatments, 111 patients with spondylodiscitis were studied retrospectively. The average durations from the start of treatment until the C-reactive protein fell below 1.0 mg/dL or below the baseline value, which was defined as “recovery time” in the present study, were compared among PND, AIF, and posterior decompression.

Results PND was performed when conservative treatment has been done for average 2.0 ± 0.9 months. Of the 18 PND patients, 15 (83%) showed recovery; 63 (97%) of the 65 patients who had AIF showed recovery. There was no significant difference of the mean recovery time after PND and AIF. All 10 patients whithout methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) recovered after PND, whereas 3 of 8 patients with MRSA did not recover after PND. Of the 3 unsuccessful PND cases, 1 later had AIF, and 1 repeated PND. One patient could not undergo additional surgery because of a poor general condition.

Conclusions Although the results of PND were inferior to AIF, PND is a useful next step after conservative treatment for patients in a poor condition. PND can be the initial procedure for spondylodiscitis before AIF if its limitations are understood.

 
  • References

  • 1 Reihsaus E, Waldbaur H, Seeling W. Spinal epidural abscess: a meta-analysis of 915 patients. Neurosurg Rev 2000; 23: 175-204 , discussion 205
  • 2 Sampath P, Rigamonti D. Spinal epidural abscess: a review of epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. J Spinal Disord 1999; Apr; 12 (2) 89-93
  • 3 Soehle M, Wallenfang T. Spinal epidural abscesses: clinical manifestations, prognostic factors, and outcomes. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 79-85 , discussion 86–87
  • 4 Khan IA, Vaccaro AR, Zlotolow DA. Management of vertebral diskitis and osteomyelitis. Orthopedics 1999; 22: 758-765
  • 5 Silber JS, Anderson DG, Vaccaro AR, Anderson PA, McCormick P. NASS. Management of postprocedural discitis. Spine J 2002; 2: 279-287
  • 6 Lam KS, Webb JK. Discitis. Hosp Med 2004; 65: 280-286
  • 7 Stüer C, Stoffel M, Hecker J, Ringel F, Meyer B. A staged treatment algorithm for spinal infections. J Neuro Surg A 2013; 74: 87-95
  • 8 Cottle L, Riordan T. Infectious spondylodiscitis. J Infect 2008; 56: 401-412
  • 9 Wirtz DC, Genius I, Wildberger JE, Adam G, Zilkens KW, Niethard FU. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of lumbar and thoracic spondylodiscitis—an evaluation of 59 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2000; 120: 245-251
  • 10 An HS, Seldomridge JA. Spinal infections: diagnostic tests and imaging studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 444: 27-33
  • 11 Hadjipavlou AG, Mader JT, Necessary JT, Muffoletto AJ. Hematogenous pyogenic spinal infections and their surgical management. Spine 2000; 25: 1668-1679
  • 12 Friedman JA, Maher CO, Quast LM, McClelland RL, Ebersold MJ. Spontaneous disc space infections in adults. Surg Neurol 2002; 57: 81-86
  • 13 Hopkinson N, Stevenson J, Benjamin S. A case ascertainment study of septic discitis: clinical, microbiological and radiological features. QJM 2001; 94: 465-470
  • 14 Fouquet B, Goupille P, Gobert F, Cotty P, Roulot B, Valat JP. Infectious discitis diagnostic contribution of laboratory tests and percutaneous discovertebral biopsy. Rev Rhum Engl Ed. 1996; Jan; 63 (1) 24-9
  • 15 Gasbarrini AL, Bertoldi E, Mazzetti M , et al. Clinical features, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to haematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2005; 9: 53-66
  • 16 Jiménez-Mejías ME, de Dios Colmenero J, Sánchez-Lora FJ , et al. Postoperative spondylodiskitis: etiology, clinical findings, prognosis, and comparison with nonoperative pyogenic spondylodiskitis. Clin Infect Dis 1999; 29: 339-345
  • 17 Legrand E, Flipo RM, Guggenbuhl P , et al; Rheumatology Network Organization. Management of nontuberculous infectious discitis. treatments used in 110 patients admitted to 12 teaching hospitals in France. Joint Bone Spine 2001; 68: 504-509
  • 18 Perronne C, Saba J, Behloul Z , et al. Pyogenic and tuberculous spondylodiskitis (vertebral osteomyelitis) in 80 adult patients. Clin Infect Dis 1994; 19: 746-750
  • 19 Vergne P, Trèves R. Spondylodiscite bactérienne. Etiologie, diagnostic, évolution, traitement. Rev Prat 1998; 48: 2065-2071