J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75(03): 187-197
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1364165
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Dual-Port 2D and 3D Endoscopy: Expanding the Limits of the Endonasal Approaches to Midline Skull Base Lesions with Lateral Extension

Andre Beer-Furlan
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, United States
2   Department of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo Medical School (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil
,
Alexander I. Evins
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, United States
,
Luigi Rigante
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, United States
,
Giulio Anichini
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, United States
,
Philip E. Stieg
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, United States
,
Antonio Bernardo
1   Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

03 September 2013

14 November 2013

Publication Date:
12 March 2014 (online)

Abstract

Objective To investigate a novel dual-port endonasal and subtemporal endoscopic approach targeting midline lesions with lateral extension beyond the intracavernous carotid artery anteriorly and the Dorello canal posteriorly.

Methods Ten dual-port approaches were performed on five cadaveric heads. All specimens underwent an endoscopic endonasal approach from the sella to middle clivus. The endonasal port was combined with an anterior or posterior endoscopic extradural subtemporal approach. The anterior subtemporal port was placed directly above the middle third of the zygomatic arch, and the posterior port was placed at its posterior root. The extradural space was explored using two-dimensional and three-dimensional endoscopes.

Results The anterior subtemporal port complemented the endonasal port with direct access to the Meckel cave, lateral sphenoid sinus, superior orbital fissure, and lateral and posterosuperior compartments of the cavernous sinus; the posterior subtemporal port enhanced access to the petrous apex. Endoscopic dissection and instrument maneuverability were feasible and performed without difficulty in both the anterior and posterior subtemporal ports.

Conclusion The anterior and posterior subtemporal ports enhanced exposure and control of the region lateral to the carotid artery and Dorello canal. Dual-port neuroendoscopy is still minimally invasive yet dramatically increases surgical maneuverability while enhancing visualization and control of anatomical structures.

 
  • References

  • 1 Jho HD, Carrau RL. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery: experience with 50 patients. J Neurosurg 1997; 87 (1) 44-51
  • 2 Cavallo LM, Messina A, Cappabianca P , et al. Endoscopic endonasal surgery of the midline skull base: anatomical study and clinical considerations. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (1) E2
  • 3 Cappabianca P, Cavallo LM, Esposito F, De Divitiis O, Messina A, De Divitiis E. Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 2008; 33: 151-199
  • 4 Zhao B, Wei YK, Li GL , et al. Extended transsphenoidal approach for pituitary adenomas invading the anterior cranial base, cavernous sinus, and clivus: a single-center experience with 126 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg 2010; 112 (1) 108-117
  • 5 Zada G, Du R, Laws Jr ER. Defining the “edge of the envelope”: patient selection in treating complex sellar-based neoplasms via transsphenoidal versus open craniotomy. J Neurosurg 2011; 114 (2) 286-300
  • 6 Taniguchi M, Perneczky A. Subtemporal keyhole approach to the suprasellar and petroclival region: microanatomic considerations and clinical application. Neurosurgery 1997; 41 (3) 592-601
  • 7 Perneczky A, Fries G. Endoscope-assisted brain surgery: part 1—evolution, basic concept, and current technique. Neurosurgery 1998; 42 (2) 219-224 ; discussion 224–225
  • 8 Kocaoğullar Y, Avci E, Fossett D, Caputy A. The extradural subtemporal keyhole approach to the sphenocavernous region: anatomic considerations. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2003; 46 (2) 100-105
  • 9 Mourgela S, Sakellaropoulos A, Anagnostopoulou S. Middle cranial fossa endoscopy using a rigid endoscope. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2007; 16 (6) 355-359
  • 10 Pichierri A, D'Avella E, Ruggeri A, Tschabitscher M, Delfini R. Endoscopic assistance in the epidural subtemporal approach and Kawase approach: anatomic study. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (3, Suppl Operative): ons29-ons37 ; discussion ons37
  • 11 Salma A, Wang S, Ammirati M. Extradural endoscope-assisted subtemporal posterior clinoidectomy: a cadaver investigation study. Neurosurgery 2010; 67 (3, Suppl Operative): ons43-ons48 ; discussion ons48
  • 12 Sun JQ, Han DM, Li YX, Gong SS, Zan HR, Wang T. Combined endoscope-assisted translabyrinthine subtemporal keyhole approach for vestibular Schwannoma and auditory midbrain implantation: cadaveric study. Acta Otolaryngol 2010; 130 (10) 1125-1129
  • 13 Gagliardi F, Boari N, Roberti F , et al. Extradural subtemporal transzygomatic approach to the clival and paraclival region with endoscopic assist. J Craniofac Surg 2012; 23 (5) 1468-1475
  • 14 Komatsu F, Komatsu M, Di Ieva A, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic extradural subtemporal approach to lateral and central skull base: a cadaveric study. World Neurosurg 2013; 80 (5) 591-597
  • 15 Loyo M, Kleriga E, Mateos H, de Leo R, Delgado A. Combined supra-infrasellar approach for large pituitary tumors. Neurosurgery 1984; 14 (4) 485-488
  • 16 Alleyne Jr CH, Barrow DL, Oyesiku NM. Combined transsphenoidal and pterional craniotomy approach to giant pituitary tumors. Surg Neurol 2002; 57 (6) 380-390 ; discussion 390
  • 17 D'Ambrosio AL, Syed ON, Grobelny BT, Freda PU, Wardlaw S, Bruce JN. Simultaneous above and below approach to giant pituitary adenomas: surgical strategies and long-term follow-up. Pituitary 2009; 12 (3) 217-225
  • 18 Nishioka H, Hara T, Usui M, Fukuhara N, Yamada S. Simultaneous combined supra-infrasellar approach for giant/large multilobulated pituitary adenomas. World Neurosurg 2012; 77 (3–4) 533-539
  • 19 Umemura A, Suzuka T, Isomura K, Ito M, Mukodaka H. Simultaneous transcranial and endoscopic transnasal approach for recurrent huge pituitary adenoma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1999; 141 (12) 1359-1360
  • 20 Greenfield JP, Leng LZ, Chaudhry U , et al. Combined simultaneous endoscopic transsphenoidal and endoscopic transventricular resection of a giant pituitary macroadenoma. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2008; 51 (5) 306-309
  • 21 Ojha BK, Husain M, Rastogi M, Chandra A, Chugh A, Husain N. Combined trans-sphenoidal and simultaneous trans-ventricular-endoscopic decompression of a giant pituitary adenoma: case report. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009; 151 (7) 843-847 ; discussion 847
  • 22 Romano A, Chibbaro S, Marsella M , et al. Combined endoscopic transsphenoidal-transventricular approach for resection of a giant pituitary macroadenoma. World Neurosurg 2010; 74 (1) 161-164
  • 23 Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part I. Crista galli to the sella turcica. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (1) E3
  • 24 Kassam A, Snyderman CH, Mintz A, Gardner P, Carrau RL. Expanded endonasal approach: the rostrocaudal axis. Part II. Posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum. Neurosurg Focus 2005; 19 (1) E4
  • 25 Schwartz TH, Fraser JF, Brown S, Tabaee A, Kacker A, Anand VK. Endoscopic cranial base surgery: classification of operative approaches. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (5) 991-1002 ; discussion 1002–1005
  • 26 Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Thomas A , et al. Endoscopic endonasal pituitary transposition for a transdorsum sellae approach to the interpeduncular cistern. Neurosurgery 2008; 62 (3) (Suppl. 01) 57-72 ; discussion 72–74
  • 27 Silva D, Attia M, Kandasamy J, Alimi M, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic endonasal posterior clinoidectomy. Surg Neurol Int 2012; 3: 64
  • 28 Cavallo LM, Cappabianca P, Galzio R, Iaconetta G, de Divitiis E, Tschabitscher M. Endoscopic transnasal approach to the cavernous sinus versus transcranial route: anatomic study. Neurosurgery 2005; 56 (2, Suppl): 379-389 ; discussion 379–389
  • 29 Alfieri A, Jho HD. Endoscopic endonasal cavernous sinus surgery: an anatomic study. Neurosurgery 2001; 48 (4) 827-836 ; discussion 836–837
  • 30 Kassam AB, Vescan AD, Carrau RL , et al. Expanded endonasal approach: vidian canal as a landmark to the petrous internal carotid artery. J Neurosurg 2008; 108 (1) 177-183
  • 31 Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Gardner PA, Prevedello DM, Kassam AB. Endoscopic endonasal surgery for petrous apex lesions. Laryngoscope 2009; 119 (1) 19-25
  • 32 Kassam AB, Prevedello DM, Carrau RL , et al. The front door to Meckel's cave: an anteromedial corridor via expanded endoscopic endonasal approach—technical considerations and clinical series. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (3, Suppl): ons71-ons82 ; discussion ons82–ons83
  • 33 Destrieux C, Velut S, Kakou MK, Lefrancq T, Arbeille B, Santini JJ. A new concept in Dorello's canal microanatomy: the petroclival venous confluence. J Neurosurg 1997; 87 (1) 67-72
  • 34 Iaconetta G, Fusco M, Samii M. The sphenopetroclival venous gulf: a microanatomical study. J Neurosurg 2003; 99 (2) 366-375
  • 35 Rhoton Jr AL. The cavernous sinus, the cavernous venous plexus, and the carotid collar. Neurosurgery 2002; 51 (4, Suppl): S375-S410
  • 36 Fries G, Reisch R. Biportal neuroendoscopic microsurgical approaches to the subarachnoid cisterns. A cadaver study. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 1996; 39 (4) 99-104
  • 37 Ciporen JN, Moe KS, Ramanathan D , et al. Multiportal endoscopic approaches to the central skull base: a cadaveric study. World Neurosurg 2010; 73 (6) 705-712
  • 38 Koos WTH, Spetzler RF, Lang J. Tumors of the base of the skull. In: Intracranial Tumors. New York, NY: Thieme; 1993: 275-283 . Color Atlas of Microneurosurgery; vol 1
  • 39 Sekhar LN, Pomeranz S, Sen CN. Extradural petrous bone and petroclival neoplasms. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1991; 53: 183-192
  • 40 Bambakidis NC, Kakarla UK, Kim LJ , et al. Evolution of surgical approaches in the treatment of petroclival meningiomas: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery 2007; 61 (5) , Suppl (Suppl. 02) 202-209 ; discussion 209–211
  • 41 Taha JM, Tew Jr JM, van Loveren HR, Keller JT, el-Kalliny M. Comparison of conventional and skull base surgical approaches for the excision of trigeminal neurinomas. J Neurosurg 1995; 82 (5) 719-725
  • 42 Yoshida K, Kawase T. Trigeminal neurinomas extending into multiple fossae: surgical methods and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 1999; 91 (2) 202-211
  • 43 Doglietto F, Lauretti L, Frank G , et al. Microscopic and endoscopic extracranial approaches to the cavernous sinus: anatomic study. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (5) (Suppl. 02) 413-421 ; discussion 421–422
  • 44 Jho HD, Ha HG. Endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery: Part 2—The cavernous sinus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2004; 47 (1) 9-15
  • 45 Fraser JF, Allen B, Anand VK, Schwartz TH. Three-dimensional neurostereoendoscopy: subjective and objective comparison to 2D. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2009; 52 (1) 25-31
  • 46 Brown SM, Tabaee A, Singh A, Schwartz TH, Anand VK. Three-dimensional endoscopic sinus surgery: feasibility and technical aspects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 138 (3) 400-402
  • 47 Tabaee A, Anand VK, Fraser JF, Brown SM, Singh A, Schwartz TH. Three-dimensional endoscopic pituitary surgery. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (5) (Suppl. 02) 288-293 ; discussion 294–295
  • 48 Roth J, Singh A, Nyquist G , et al. Three-dimensional and 2-dimensional endoscopic exposure of midline cranial base targets using expanded endonasal and transcranial approaches. Neurosurgery 2009; 65 (6) 1116-1128 ; discussion 1128–1130